Digital vs Analog cordless Phone? Health Radiation is the s

L

lbbss

Guest
I noticed that you can buy a 5.8Mhz phone in both analog or digital.
I realize most people thing cordless phones are fairly safe, but is
an still curious if one gives off more radiation then the other before
I buy a my next phone. thanks
 
5.8 GHz (not MHz) phones don't seem to have very good range. You might look
at the DECT 6.0 phones which work a bit above 2 GHz.

Unless you expect to be on the phone for many hours each day, I don't see
why you should be much worried about the amoung of RF your brain is
receiving.

Excuse me, but the open sore above my right ear has started bleeding again,
and I have to attend to it.
 
more power equals more radiation? is that correct?

I read some info on the web suggesting that the new Dect technology is
worst for you, because of the lower frequencies (1.9Ghz) affects your
cells in a negative way.
 
"lbbss" <labicff@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f1beef7d-0935-47e1-a28b-cad694ef8628@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
more power equals more radiation? is that correct?

I read some info on the web suggesting that the new Dect technology is
worst for you, because of the lower frequencies (1.9Ghz) affects your
cells in a negative way.
Click to expand...
More power means more tissue heating and that (heating) is the concern. RF
heats tissues. Stick a hot dog in the microwave as a basic experiment.

Non-ionizing energy sources just do heat damage. A dozen mW or even
hundreds of them are of no concern. The temperature rise is almost
impossible to measure after it passes through thick skulls.
 
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:25:11 -0000, Charles <charlesschuler@comcast.net> wrote:

"lbbss" <labicff@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f1beef7d-0935-47e1-a28b-cad694ef8628@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
more power equals more radiation? is that correct?

I read some info on the web suggesting that the new Dect technology is
worst for you, because of the lower frequencies (1.9Ghz) affects your
cells in a negative way.

More power means more tissue heating and that (heating) is the concern. RF
heats tissues. Stick a hot dog in the microwave as a basic experiment.

Non-ionizing energy sources just do heat damage. A dozen mW or even
hundreds of them are of no concern. The temperature rise is almost
impossible to measure after it passes through thick skulls.
Click to expand...
If it were heating, you would feel it heating your flesh surely?

--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com

"You seem to have a cracked vertebrae." the Emergency Room doctor told the high school aged boy. "What happened?"
"Well, you see," the teenager replied, "I was kissing my girl good-night and damned if her brother didn't come out the back door and step right in the middle of my back."
 
On Saturday, December 20, 2008 5:25:11 PM UTC-5, Charles wrote:
"lbbss" <labicff@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f1beef7d-0935-47e1-a28b-cad694ef8628@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
more power equals more radiation? is that correct?

I read some info on the web suggesting that the new Dect technology is
worst for you, because of the lower frequencies (1.9Ghz) affects your
cells in a negative way.

More power means more tissue heating and that (heating) is the concern. RF
heats tissues. Stick a hot dog in the microwave as a basic experiment.

Non-ionizing energy sources just do heat damage. A dozen mW or even
hundreds of them are of no concern. The temperature rise is almost
impossible to measure after it passes through thick skulls.
Click to expand...
Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone. I bought Siemens Gigaset A580 from Australia but my call waiting did not work in Canada, actually I had to disconnect current conversation in order to answer new incoming call. Besides that, I liked that phone because it had Eco Mode PLUS (the phone is dead now). Now the problem is that in Canada and US we can not buy Eco Mode PLUS phone, we can only buy Eco Mode which means base station is pulsing/radiating ALL THE TIME. I would appreciate if you can help me to choose a new cordless phone for my home (even if it's an older type as long as it has call display and call waiting). Please help me choose the phone and please explain what technology and why (analog, digital, 2.4GHz, 5.8GHz, etc).
Thank you in advance and I wish you good luck with your researches!
Peja
 
<borjanic@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, December 20, 2008 5:25:11 PM UTC-5, Charles wrote:
"lbbss" <labicff@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f1beef7d-0935-47e1-a28b-cad694ef8628@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
more power equals more radiation? is that correct?

I read some info on the web suggesting that the new Dect technology is
worst for you, because of the lower frequencies (1.9Ghz) affects your
cells in a negative way.

More power means more tissue heating and that (heating) is the concern. RF
heats tissues. Stick a hot dog in the microwave as a basic experiment.

Non-ionizing energy sources just do heat damage. A dozen mW or even
hundreds of them are of no concern. The temperature rise is almost
impossible to measure after it passes through thick skulls.

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone. I
bought Siemens Gigaset A580 from Australia but my call waiting did not
work in Canada, actually I had to disconnect current conversation in
order to answer new incoming call. Besides that, I liked that phone
because it had Eco Mode PLUS (the phone is dead now). Now the problem is
that in Canada and US we can not buy Eco Mode PLUS phone, we can only buy
Eco Mode which means base station is pulsing/radiating ALL THE TIME. I
would appreciate if you can help me to choose a new cordless phone for my
home (even if it's an older type as long as it has call display and call
waiting). Please help me choose the phone and please explain what
technology and why (analog, digital, 2.4GHz, 5.8GHz, etc).
Thank you in advance and I wish you good luck with your researches!
Peja
Click to expand...
The only reliable phone I have is an old 800 MHz analog. My DECT Uniden
would be great except it cuts out often for 20 sec, goes into privacy mode.
Software issues I think. Garbage. There are so many model look a likes,
make buying difficult, plus they change models too often.

Greg
 
borjanic@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.
Click to expand...

How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?
 
On Jan 16, 10:28 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
borja...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


   How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?
Grin, Maybe semaphore. :^)
Click to expand...

George H.
 
Michael A. Terrell skrev:
borjanic@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?
Click to expand...
Infrared?

--
Husk křrelys bagpĺ, hvis din bilfabrikant har taget den idiotiske
beslutning at undlade det.
 
On 1/16/2013 10:35 AM, Leif Neland wrote:
Michael A. Terrell skrev:
borjanic@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?

Infrared?

Get one with a speakerphone in the handset.
Click to expand...
Stand as far away as possible while you talk.
 
George Herold wrote:
On Jan 16, 10:28 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
borja...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?
Grin, Maybe semaphore. :^)
Click to expand...

Even a fullphore wouldn't help him. ;-)
 
Leif Neland wrote:
Michael A. Terrell skrev:
borjanic@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?

Infrared?
Click to expand...

Duh. How will you have infrared without radiation?
 
mike wrote:
On 1/16/2013 10:35 AM, Leif Neland wrote:
Michael A. Terrell skrev:
borjanic@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?

Infrared?

Get one with a speakerphone in the handset.
Stand as far away as possible while you talk.
Click to expand...

Run a couple wires for the speaker, to reduce feedback. ;-)
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Leif Neland wrote:
Infrared?

Duh. How will you have infrared without radiation?
Click to expand...
Better than 2.4GHz Bluetooth radiation though, IMO.


--
Daniel Mandic
 
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
borjanic@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?
Click to expand...
I think he is talking about base which radiates continuously. Just keep
base at distance, it will be no problem. The handset is right in your face,
but even it is only 10 mw low power. A cell phone could be at least 30
times this power.

Greg
 
Daniel Mandic wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Leif Neland wrote:
Infrared?

Duh. How will you have infrared without radiation?

Better than 2.4GHz Bluetooth radiation though, IMO.
Click to expand...

Really? Do you have any idea how much IR radiation you would need to
be able to use a cordless phone around a corner, or on the other side of
a wall?
 
gregz wrote:
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:
borjanic@gmail.com wrote:

Hello,

I live in Canada and I need good (low or no radiation) cordless phone.


How is it supposed to work if it doesn't radiate some RF?

I think he is talking about base which radiates continuously. Just keep
base at distance, it will be no problem. The handset is right in your face,
but even it is only 10 mw low power. A cell phone could be at least 30
times this power.
Click to expand...

Don't you think that if cell phones posed any real danger we would
have overflowing cemetaries today? How about the engineers who spent
their entire adult lives working in high power RF fields which would
light flourescent lamps with no connections, yet they were still healthy
in their 80s. I met them at a VOA facility, and the old 500 KW WLW
transmitter site.
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Daniel Mandic wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Leif Neland wrote:
Duh. How will you have infrared without radiation?

Better than 2.4GHz Bluetooth radiation though, IMO.

Really? Do you have any idea how much IR radiation you would need
to be able to use a cordless phone around a corner, or on the other
side of a wall?
Click to expand...
Of course, IR is more directional. I meant 'better' concerning the
health question. Cordless phone with IR makes no sense to me..., maybe
in an open room/appartment without interior-walls, corners etc., with a
360° IR transmitting unit installed on the ceiling, if there is such
thing.


--
Daniel Mandic
 
Daniel Mandic wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:


Daniel Mandic wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

Leif Neland wrote:
Duh. How will you have infrared without radiation?

Better than 2.4GHz Bluetooth radiation though, IMO.

Really? Do you have any idea how much IR radiation you would need
to be able to use a cordless phone around a corner, or on the other
side of a wall?

Of course, IR is more directional. I meant 'better' concerning the
health question. Cordless phone with IR makes no sense to me..., maybe
in an open room/appartment without interior-walls, corners etc., with a
360° IR transmitting unit installed on the ceiling, if there is such
thing.
Click to expand...


My 5.8 GHz panasonic cordless phone works 100 feet from the base, all
over the inside of my house, the outbuildings and the entire lot. How
would you use IR when it's 100°F or hotter outside?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top