B
Bret Cahill
Guest
.. . .
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?
Bret Cahill
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?
Bret Cahill
K
krw
Guest
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:09:19 -0800 (PST), "gdewilde@gmail.com"
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
Wrong. Patents make big corporations loads of money.On Jan 11, 3:49 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?
Bret Cahill
It's just a legal document for them. It doesn't cost them any real
money to have the official doc. It is for the make believe game they
play with their investors. The real technology is proprietary
property. The market is all about convincing consumers to pay as much
as possible for old tech.
You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.Make the SUV as big as the marketing campaign can sell. The actual
technology has nothing to do with it.
The Ipod is just another walkman.
Ask any hardware expert and after stressing him enough he will confess
modern computers could preform 10 000 times faster. The last real
computer was the solar powered calculator from 1980. The C64 was
already a scrap heap, everything after that was pure marketing circus.
The axle driven bicycle was invented in 1800, it was much superior but
the chain drive won because it was cheaper to produce back then. Today
people have been conditioned to think a bicycle must have a chain.
The conditioning is the money, not the technology.
Patents are 100% irrelevant.
G
gdewilde@gmail.com
Guest
On Jan 11, 3:49 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
money to have the official doc. It is for the make believe game they
play with their investors. The real technology is proprietary
property. The market is all about convincing consumers to pay as much
as possible for old tech.
Make the SUV as big as the marketing campaign can sell. The actual
technology has nothing to do with it.
The Ipod is just another walkman.
Ask any hardware expert and after stressing him enough he will confess
modern computers could preform 10 000 times faster. The last real
computer was the solar powered calculator from 1980. The C64 was
already a scrap heap, everything after that was pure marketing circus.
The axle driven bicycle was invented in 1800, it was much superior but
the chain drive won because it was cheaper to produce back then. Today
people have been conditioned to think a bicycle must have a chain.
The conditioning is the money, not the technology.
Patents are 100% irrelevant.
______________
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
It's just a legal document for them. It doesn't cost them any realOh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?
Bret Cahill
money to have the official doc. It is for the make believe game they
play with their investors. The real technology is proprietary
property. The market is all about convincing consumers to pay as much
as possible for old tech.
Make the SUV as big as the marketing campaign can sell. The actual
technology has nothing to do with it.
The Ipod is just another walkman.
Ask any hardware expert and after stressing him enough he will confess
modern computers could preform 10 000 times faster. The last real
computer was the solar powered calculator from 1980. The C64 was
already a scrap heap, everything after that was pure marketing circus.
The axle driven bicycle was invented in 1800, it was much superior but
the chain drive won because it was cheaper to produce back then. Today
people have been conditioned to think a bicycle must have a chain.
The conditioning is the money, not the technology.
Patents are 100% irrelevant.
______________
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
K
krw
Guest
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:24:14 -0800 (PST), "gdewilde@gmail.com"
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
Did the loon have something to say?On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Patents make big corporations loads of money.
Yes, they have quite the theater going on.
No, you can leave anytime.You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.
I don't need your company.
I see you're best pals with comrad Cahill.I already have a toilet.
G
gdewilde@gmail.com
Guest
On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
I already have a toilet.
Yes, they have quite the theater going on.Patents make big corporations loads of money.
I don't need your company.You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.
I already have a toilet.
G
gdewilde@gmail.com
Guest
On Jan 12, 1:18 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Welcome to usenet.No, you can leave anytime.
K
krw
Guest
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:42:09 -0800 (PST), "gdewilde@gmail.com"
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
I thought you were just leaving.On Jan 12, 1:18 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
No, you can leave anytime.
Welcome to usenet.
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
You really have to be a dunce to have a discussion this long with
someone on "the program:"
2 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
3 krw Jan 11
4 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
5 krw Jan 11
6 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 13
7 krw Jan 15
Have you ever thought about what the handle "wild gab" means?
Are you _really_ this stupid or are you just being silly?
Bret Cahill
someone on "the program:"
2 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
3 krw Jan 11
4 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
5 krw Jan 11
6 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 13
7 krw Jan 15
Have you ever thought about what the handle "wild gab" means?
Are you _really_ this stupid or are you just being silly?
Bret Cahill
K
krw
Guest
In article <d0495b5c-37ff-437c-b27c-
5033d1b5d98a@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, BretCahill@peoplepc.com
says...>
here has been telling you?
5033d1b5d98a@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, BretCahill@peoplepc.com
says...>
Have you ever considered that you really are as stupid as everyoneYou really have to be a dunce to have a discussion this long with
someone on "the program:"
2 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
3 krw Jan 11
4 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
5 krw Jan 11
6 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 13
7 krw Jan 15
Have you ever thought about what the handle "wild gab" means?
Are you _really_ this stupid or are you just being silly?
here has been telling you?
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
A dunce will cling to his fantasy no matter what:
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Bret Cahill
.. . .Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those othersThere's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Bret Cahill
K
krw
Guest
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:41:59 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:
....but you knew that and were just trying to restart an old troll
because you ran out of fresh bait.
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:
Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's.A dunce will cling to his fantasy no matter what:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
....but you knew that and were just trying to restart an old troll
because you ran out of fresh bait.
G
gabydewilde
Guest
On Jan 16, 5:52 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Don't let it get to you.
On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
You've been wrong before.On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:42:09 -0800 (PST), "gdewi...@gmail.com"
gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 12, 1:18 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
No, you can leave anytime.
Welcome to usenet.
I thought you were just leaving.
Don't let it get to you.
On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Wrong. Patents make big corporations loads of money.
Make the SUV as big as the marketing campaign can sell. The actual
technology has nothing to do with it.
The Ipod is just another walkman.
Ask any hardware expert and after stressing him enough he will confess
modern computers could preform 10 000 times faster. The last real
computer was the solar powered calculator from 1980. The C64 was
already a scrap heap, everything after that was pure marketing circus.
The axle driven bicycle was invented in 1800, it was much superior but
the chain drive won because it was cheaper to produce back then. Today
people have been conditioned to think a bicycle must have a chain.
The conditioning is the money, not the technology.
Patents are 100% irrelevant.
You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.
G
gabydewilde
Guest
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=7161
In 1942, Henry Ford patented a plastic-bodied automobile. The car was
30 percent lighter than ordinary cars. Plastic, a relatively new
material in 1942, was revolutionizing industry after industry in the
United States. Today most car bodies are still made of metal, but
plastic parts are becoming more and more common.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7748874.stm
"19 December The US government says it will provide $17.4bn in loans
to help troubled carmakers General Motors and Chrysler survive -
though Ford says it hopes to cope without the aid."
:>
bla bla bla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rgDyEO_8cI
"Old archival footage of Ford's 1941 hemp car."
In 1942, Henry Ford patented a plastic-bodied automobile. The car was
30 percent lighter than ordinary cars. Plastic, a relatively new
material in 1942, was revolutionizing industry after industry in the
United States. Today most car bodies are still made of metal, but
plastic parts are becoming more and more common.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7748874.stm
"19 December The US government says it will provide $17.4bn in loans
to help troubled carmakers General Motors and Chrysler survive -
though Ford says it hopes to cope without the aid."
:> Patents make big corporations loads of money.On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
:
:>
bla bla bla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rgDyEO_8cI
"Old archival footage of Ford's 1941 hemp car."
K
krw
Guest
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:24:48 -0800 (PST), gabydewilde
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:
You lie.On Jan 16, 5:52 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:42:09 -0800 (PST), "gdewi...@gmail.com"
gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 12, 1:18 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
No, you can leave anytime.
Welcome to usenet.
I thought you were just leaving.
You've been wrong before.
I never let Usenet liars get to me.Don't let it get to you.
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:
Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.
Even drug smugglers who never get caught eventually acquire _some_
public record.
You dunces are the mother lode of nonsense.
Bret Cahill
And we all know your dunce's business model:Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... �they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ďż˝
Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.
Even drug smugglers who never get caught eventually acquire _some_
public record.
It's easy to find....but you knew that and were just trying to restart an old troll
because you ran out of fresh bait.
You dunces are the mother lode of nonsense.
Bret Cahill
K
krw
Guest
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:38:34 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:
to you, an ignorant, invisible, quack.
You're fresh out.
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:
Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?
And we all know your dunce's business model:
John is not "under radar". His business is quite visible, as opposedFantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.
to you, an ignorant, invisible, quack.
You're an idiot.Even drug smugglers who never get caught eventually acquire _some_
public record.
FOr anyone with any intelligence, perhaps, though that leaves you out....but you knew that and were just trying to restart an old troll
because you ran out of fresh bait.
It's easy to find.
You're fresh out.
Says the mother_.You dunces are the mother lode of nonsense.
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
Rightards pretending McCain was elected is an analogous problem.
You are part of a confederacy of dunces, about a half dozen idiots on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.
one has been making money repairing computers for over a decade.
You forced you dunce buddy into claiming that he "designs circuits."
Bret Cahill
Probably true but that dodges the issue:It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?
And we all know your dunce's business model:
Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.
You are part of a confederacy of dunces, about a half dozen idiots on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.
Certainly not since one dunce outed the other dunce by claiming noFantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.
John is not "under radar".
one has been making money repairing computers for over a decade.
You forced you dunce buddy into claiming that he "designs circuits."
Bret Cahill
K
krw
Guest
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:49:55 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:
demonstration, comrade.
money off fools. Other than that, no.
company. You're gettin pretty well known too, as the US' answer to
the Dumb Donkey.
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:
No, it shows your idiocy. Not that anyone needed anotherRightards pretending McCain was elected is an analogous problem.
It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?
And we all know your dunce's business model:
Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.
Probably true but that dodges the issue:
demonstration, comrade.
No, we're certainly not in your category. Not even close, comrade.You are part of a confederacy of dunces, about a half dozen idiots on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.
IBM makes money repairing computers, yes. I suppose Worst Buy makesFantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.
John is not "under radar".
Certainly not since one dunce outed the other dunce by claiming no
one has been making money repairing computers for over a decade.
money off fools. Other than that, no.
I "forced" him? You're an idiot. John is well known, as is hisYou forced you dunce buddy into claiming that he "designs circuits."
company. You're gettin pretty well known too, as the US' answer to
the Dumb Donkey.
B
Bret Cahill
Guest
<Dodge # 2 snipped>Rightards pretending McCain was elected is an analogous problem.
It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?
And we all know your dunce's business model:
Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.
Probably true but that dodges the issue:
Dodging and denying it only proves you are in a rightardish state ofYou are part of a confederacy of dunces, about a half dozen idiots on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.
No,
denial.
True. You're dunces. All 6 of you.we're certainly not in your category.
Maybe you ought to get some looneytarians, gun nutters, bigots and
other trailer trash to fill out yer sorry ranks.
Too late for damage control. You outed your fellow dunce.�Not even close, comrade.
Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.
John is not "under radar".
Certainly not since one dunce outed the other dunce by claiming �no
one has been making money repairing computers for over a decade.
IBM makes money repairing computers, yes. �I suppose Worst Buy makes
money off fools. �Other than that, no.
This is what a confederacy of dunces typically does. They shoot each
other in the foot.
You said no one has made any money repairing 'puters for more than aYou forced you dunce buddy into claiming that he "designs circuits."
I "forced" him? ďż˝
decade.
Are you going to deny that?
.. . .
Can you name even _one_ person who makes more than a skool teacher whoJohn is well known, as is his
company. ďż˝
isn't in the public record?
Not from bantering with a bunch of dunces pretending thay have someYou're gettin pretty well known too,
tech background.
Now are you going to get back to pretending the Party of Reagan isn't
on the ash heap of history or what?
Bret Cahill
Z
zzbunker@netscape.net
Guest
On Jan 11, 9:49 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
overruled the patents on Electronic Computers. So the wanks
are just doing a Honneywell, and making thermostats these days.
But, since the only thing any of the Engineering ignoramous' even
know
about thermostats is GM, that's also why the only people who even
bid on their crank stock anymore is MBA's from Apple Crank-Ville.
> Bret Cahill
Since they have no choice. Since the Supreme Court alreadyOh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
. . .
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?
overruled the patents on Electronic Computers. So the wanks
are just doing a Honneywell, and making thermostats these days.
But, since the only thing any of the Engineering ignoramous' even
know
about thermostats is GM, that's also why the only people who even
bid on their crank stock anymore is MBA's from Apple Crank-Ville.
> Bret Cahill