Difficulty In Trying To Fake A Successful Tech Business w/o

B

Bret Cahill

Guest
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.

That ain't the public record.

If you mean court records, correct:

So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.
.. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.

Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?


Bret Cahill
 
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:09:19 -0800 (PST), "gdewilde@gmail.com"
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 11, 3:49 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents...  they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?

Bret Cahill

It's just a legal document for them. It doesn't cost them any real
money to have the official doc. It is for the make believe game they
play with their investors. The real technology is proprietary
property. The market is all about convincing consumers to pay as much
as possible for old tech.
Wrong. Patents make big corporations loads of money.

Make the SUV as big as the marketing campaign can sell. The actual
technology has nothing to do with it.

The Ipod is just another walkman.

Ask any hardware expert and after stressing him enough he will confess
modern computers could preform 10 000 times faster. The last real
computer was the solar powered calculator from 1980. The C64 was
already a scrap heap, everything after that was pure marketing circus.

The axle driven bicycle was invented in 1800, it was much superior but
the chain drive won because it was cheaper to produce back then. Today
people have been conditioned to think a bicycle must have a chain.

The conditioning is the money, not the technology.

Patents are 100% irrelevant.
You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.
 
On Jan 11, 3:49 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents...  they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?

Bret Cahill
It's just a legal document for them. It doesn't cost them any real
money to have the official doc. It is for the make believe game they
play with their investors. The real technology is proprietary
property. The market is all about convincing consumers to pay as much
as possible for old tech.

Make the SUV as big as the marketing campaign can sell. The actual
technology has nothing to do with it.

The Ipod is just another walkman.

Ask any hardware expert and after stressing him enough he will confess
modern computers could preform 10 000 times faster. The last real
computer was the solar powered calculator from 1980. The C64 was
already a scrap heap, everything after that was pure marketing circus.

The axle driven bicycle was invented in 1800, it was much superior but
the chain drive won because it was cheaper to produce back then. Today
people have been conditioned to think a bicycle must have a chain.

The conditioning is the money, not the technology.

Patents are 100% irrelevant.

______________
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
 
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:24:14 -0800 (PST), "gdewilde@gmail.com"
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

 Patents make big corporations loads of money.


Yes, they have quite the theater going on.
Did the loon have something to say?

You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.

I don't need your company.
No, you can leave anytime.

I already have a toilet.
I see you're best pals with comrad Cahill.
 
On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
 Patents make big corporations loads of money.
Yes, they have quite the theater going on.

You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.
I don't need your company.

I already have a toilet.
 
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:42:09 -0800 (PST), "gdewilde@gmail.com"
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 12, 1:18 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

No, you can leave anytime.


Welcome to usenet.
I thought you were just leaving.
 
You really have to be a dunce to have a discussion this long with
someone on "the program:"

2 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
3 krw Jan 11
4 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
5 krw Jan 11
6 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 13
7 krw Jan 15

Have you ever thought about what the handle "wild gab" means?

Are you _really_ this stupid or are you just being silly?


Bret Cahill
 
In article <d0495b5c-37ff-437c-b27c-
5033d1b5d98a@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, BretCahill@peoplepc.com
says...>
You really have to be a dunce to have a discussion this long with
someone on "the program:"

2 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
3 krw Jan 11
4 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 11
5 krw Jan 11
6 gdewilde@gmail.com Jan 13
7 krw Jan 15

Have you ever thought about what the handle "wild gab" means?

Are you _really_ this stupid or are you just being silly?
Have you ever considered that you really are as stupid as everyone
here has been telling you?
 
A dunce will cling to his fantasy no matter what:

Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.
.. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,
Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?


Bret Cahill
 
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:41:59 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:

A dunce will cling to his fantasy no matter what:

Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?
Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's.

....but you knew that and were just trying to restart an old troll
because you ran out of fresh bait.
 
On Jan 16, 5:52 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:42:09 -0800 (PST), "gdewi...@gmail.com"

gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 12, 1:18 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

No, you can leave anytime.

Welcome to usenet.

I thought you were just leaving.
You've been wrong before.

Don't let it get to you.

On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
Wrong. Patents make big corporations loads of money.



Make the SUV as big as the marketing campaign can sell. The actual
technology has nothing to do with it.

The Ipod is just another walkman.

Ask any hardware expert and after stressing him enough he will confess
modern computers could preform 10 000 times faster. The last real
computer was the solar powered calculator from 1980. The C64 was
already a scrap heap, everything after that was pure marketing circus.

The axle driven bicycle was invented in 1800, it was much superior but
the chain drive won because it was cheaper to produce back then. Today
people have been conditioned to think a bicycle must have a chain.

The conditioning is the money, not the technology.

Patents are 100% irrelevant.

You're just as looney as comrad Cahill.
 
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history.do?action=Article&id=7161
In 1942, Henry Ford patented a plastic-bodied automobile. The car was
30 percent lighter than ordinary cars. Plastic, a relatively new
material in 1942, was revolutionizing industry after industry in the
United States. Today most car bodies are still made of metal, but
plastic parts are becoming more and more common.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7748874.stm
"19 December The US government says it will provide $17.4bn in loans
to help troubled carmakers General Motors and Chrysler survive -
though Ford says it hopes to cope without the aid."

On Jan 11, 10:41 pm, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
:
:> Patents make big corporations loads of money.
:>

bla bla bla

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rgDyEO_8cI
"Old archival footage of Ford's 1941 hemp car."
 
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:24:48 -0800 (PST), gabydewilde
<gdewilde@gmail.com> wrote:

On Jan 16, 5:52 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:42:09 -0800 (PST), "gdewi...@gmail.com"

gdewi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 12, 1:18 am, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

No, you can leave anytime.

Welcome to usenet.

I thought you were just leaving.

You've been wrong before.
You lie.

Don't let it get to you.
I never let Usenet liars get to me.
 
It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:

Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... �they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?

Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ďż˝
And we all know your dunce's business model:

Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.

Even drug smugglers who never get caught eventually acquire _some_
public record.

...but you knew that and were just trying to restart an old troll
because you ran out of fresh bait.
It's easy to find.

You dunces are the mother lode of nonsense.


Bret Cahill
 
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:38:34 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:

It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:

Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?

Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?

And we all know your dunce's business model:
Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.

Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.
John is not "under radar". His business is quite visible, as opposed
to you, an ignorant, invisible, quack.

Even drug smugglers who never get caught eventually acquire _some_
public record.
You're an idiot.

...but you knew that and were just trying to restart an old troll
because you ran out of fresh bait.

It's easy to find.
FOr anyone with any intelligence, perhaps, though that leaves you out.
You're fresh out.

You dunces are the mother lode of nonsense.
Says the mother_.
 
Rightards pretending McCain was elected is an analogous problem.

It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:

Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?

Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?

And we all know your dunce's business model:

Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.
Probably true but that dodges the issue:

You are part of a confederacy of dunces, about a half dozen idiots on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.

Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.

John is not "under radar".
Certainly not since one dunce outed the other dunce by claiming no
one has been making money repairing computers for over a decade.

You forced you dunce buddy into claiming that he "designs circuits."


Bret Cahill
 
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:49:55 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@peoplepc.com> wrote:

Rightards pretending McCain was elected is an analogous problem.

It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:

Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?

Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?

And we all know your dunce's business model:

Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.

Probably true but that dodges the issue:
No, it shows your idiocy. Not that anyone needed another
demonstration, comrade.

You are part of a confederacy of dunces, about a half dozen idiots on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.
No, we're certainly not in your category. Not even close, comrade.

Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.

John is not "under radar".

Certainly not since one dunce outed the other dunce by claiming no
one has been making money repairing computers for over a decade.
IBM makes money repairing computers, yes. I suppose Worst Buy makes
money off fools. Other than that, no.

You forced you dunce buddy into claiming that he "designs circuits."
I "forced" him? You're an idiot. John is well known, as is his
company. You're gettin pretty well known too, as the US' answer to
the Dumb Donkey.
 
Rightards pretending McCain was elected is an analogous problem.

It's so flattering to be opposed by a confederacy of dunces:

Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.

Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.

I don't have patents... ?they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are wasting billions prosecuting them?

Likey because their business model is a bit different than JL's. ?

And we all know your dunce's business model:

Sorry, comrade, I don't own any dunces.

Probably true but that dodges the issue:
<Dodge # 2 snipped>

You are part of a confederacy of dunces, about a half dozen idiots on
sci.electronics.basics who are in pretend land.

No,
Dodging and denying it only proves you are in a rightardish state of
denial.

we're certainly not in your category.
True. You're dunces. All 6 of you.

Maybe you ought to get some looneytarians, gun nutters, bigots and
other trailer trash to fill out yer sorry ranks.

�Not even close, comrade.

Fantacizing that anyone will believe that _any_ substantive business
can fly under radar.

John is not "under radar".

Certainly not since one dunce outed the other dunce by claiming �no
one has been making money repairing computers for over a decade.

IBM makes money repairing computers, yes. �I suppose Worst Buy makes
money off fools. �Other than that, no.
Too late for damage control. You outed your fellow dunce.

This is what a confederacy of dunces typically does. They shoot each
other in the foot.

You forced you dunce buddy into claiming that he "designs circuits."

I "forced" him? ďż˝
You said no one has made any money repairing 'puters for more than a
decade.

Are you going to deny that?

.. . .


John is well known, as is his
company. ďż˝
Can you name even _one_ person who makes more than a skool teacher who
isn't in the public record?

You're gettin pretty well known too,
Not from bantering with a bunch of dunces pretending thay have some
tech background.

Now are you going to get back to pretending the Party of Reagan isn't
on the ash heap of history or what?


Bret Cahill
 
On Jan 11, 9:49 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.

. . .

There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
I don't have patents...  they are a huge waste of time,

Do you have a clue as to why IBM, HP, TI Apple and all those others
are
wasting billions prosecuting them?
Since they have no choice. Since the Supreme Court already
overruled the patents on Electronic Computers. So the wanks
are just doing a Honneywell, and making thermostats these days.
But, since the only thing any of the Engineering ignoramous' even
know
about thermostats is GM, that's also why the only people who even
bid on their crank stock anymore is MBA's from Apple Crank-Ville.




> Bret Cahill
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top