Deep Impact, Potential EMP pulse.

[The Flavored Coffee Guy]

In spite of NASA's refusal to accept that the pressures resulting from
deep impact's impact on the comet being well beyond those found on the
sun, they've posted no warnings.

They assume that the comet is a rubble pile. As if there isn't any
potential of a comet impacting an meteorite, and producing a solid
core.

When a impact pressure produces a pressure in excess of that found only
on the sun, then the potential of a nuclear reaction involving
non-fissle isotopes becomes possible.

Unplug your computers transient protector from the wall but, do not
unplug your computer from the transient protector.

If the comet is a rubble pile, then only 4.5 tons of tnt will equal it,
and there will be no EMP pulse. If not, unguessable. I've done the
math, and if they hit a hard spot of sufficient mass, then the
pressures will exceed those found on the sun, where raw hydrogen is in
fusion and fision.

A nuclear reaction will generate an EMP pulse. But, that far away, and
the antenna that would recieve the full potential of that power isn't a
small box filled with components, like your computer. But, a birds
nest of wire like the power grid that leads to your house from the
power station.

 

[The Flavored Coffee Guy]

Okay, look at the flash. 4.5 tons tnt was their calculation. The
flash is shown to be almost the same diameter as the comet itself.
Kilotons.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/main/index.html

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/images/Deep_Impact_Images_Search_Agent_archive_2.html

 

[The Flavored Coffee Guy]

Refrence to finding sun's pressure at the convective zone
http://www.sparknotes.com/astronomy/sun/section4.rhtml

Refrence to impact pressures
http://www.science.org.au/nova/058/058key.htm

The flash from several angles
http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html

The Movie of the blast, with the excess light removed.
http://www.nasa.gov/mov/121527main_MRI_impact.mov

Refrence to pressures nearly equal to those achieved by deep impact.
http://flux.aps.org/meetings/YR01/DPP01/abs/S1600101.html

All of the required information needed to calculate an estimate is
refered to in all of the above links as a sum of links and refrences.

 

[The Caretaker]

The Flavored Coffee Guy wrote:

Refrence to finding sun's pressure at the convective zone
http://www.sparknotes.com/astronomy/sun/section4.rhtml

Refrence to impact pressures
http://www.science.org.au/nova/058/058key.htm

The flash from several angles
http://deepimpact.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html

The Movie of the blast, with the excess light removed.
http://www.nasa.gov/mov/121527main_MRI_impact.mov

Refrence to pressures nearly equal to those achieved by deep impact.
http://flux.aps.org/meetings/YR01/DPP01/abs/S1600101.html

All of the required information needed to calculate an estimate is
refered to in all of the above links as a sum of links and refrences.

Not really.

To make such calculations would also require you to do a lot of
guesswork and make a few suppositions, which, seeing as the expected
event you predicted didn't happen, would appear to have been flawed.

As usual with many 'UFO reports'.

--
The Caretaker .........

 

We're missing the larger point that NASA does not know what it is
doing, at least in this case.

Agreed?

Regards,
http://icold.blogspot.com

 

[Al Smith]

We're missing the larger point that NASA does not know what it is
doing, at least in this case.

Agreed?

Regards,
http://icold.blogspot.com

Well, no. I mean, granted, NASA has screwed up frequently in the
last couple of decades, but the whole comet mission went pretty
well according to plan.

 

[John Fields]

On 6 Jul 2005 12:17:12 -0700, rotobo-x@mailcity.com wrote:

We're missing the larger point that NASA does not know what it is
doing, at least in this case.

Agreed?

---
No.

The mission went exactly according to plan, and after six years of
planning the probe was launched and deployed and performed just like
it was supposed to.

Could you have done better?

No, so what're you bashing NASA about? That they didn't live up to
your expectations? Which were that they'd fail so you could be the
harbinger of bad news and be then prophet who said, "See, I told you
so"?

Get lost, loser.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[Bob]

<rotobo-x@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:1120677432.689035.324730@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

We're missing the larger point that NASA does not know what it is
doing, at least in this case.

Agreed?

Regards,
http://icold.blogspot.com

You're a fool.

Bob

 

[The Caretaker]

rotobo-x@mailcity.com wrote:

We're missing the larger point that NASA does not know what it is
doing, at least in this case.

I think it's been proved, by his own attributions, that the OP is
absolutely wrong, not NASA.

Agreed?

Not at all.

NASA devised, deployed and managed this mission to such a degree of
accuracy that the data gathered might be useful for years to come.

What have you done that can have the same epithet applied?

Stop being a fucking prophet of doom and just step back and listen to
yourself. You might see why so many 'normal' people see UFOlogists and
doom-mongers as mere loonies.

--
The Caretaker .........

 

[Bob Myers]

<rotobo-x@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:1120677432.689035.324730@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

We're missing the larger point that NASA does not know what it is
doing, at least in this case.

No, all the evidence is that NASA/JPL knew precisely what they
were doing in this case.

Bob M.

 

[Bob Monsen]

Bob Myers wrote:

rotobo-x@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:1120677432.689035.324730@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

We're missing the larger point that NASA does not know what it is
doing, at least in this case.


No, all the evidence is that NASA/JPL knew precisely what they
were doing in this case.

Bob M.

Well, the point of research is to do things in a controlled way that you
don't really know the outcome of beforehand. However, the idea that this
hit would create a blast that could crash your computer is nonsense.

Assuming the thing actually could explode, the energy would emerge in a
sphere. By the time this sphere hit us, it would have an area of
2.4x10^24 square miles. The cross section of your computer is about 3e-7
miles^2. Thus, the ratio of energy hitting your computer to the entire
energy output would be 1.35e-31. Assuming an energy output of 1 million
megatons, (1 megaton = 4.184e15 joules), your computer would be
subjected to about 500pJ. The entire earth would catch about 14 microjoules.

--
Regards,
Bob Monsen

If a little knowledge is dangerous, where is the man who has
so much as to be out of danger?
Thomas Henry Huxley, 1877

 

[Bob Myers]

"Bob Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iZCdnXI73e31SFDfRVn-tQ@comcast.com...

No, all the evidence is that NASA/JPL knew precisely what they
were doing in this case.

Bob M.



Well, the point of research is to do things in a controlled way that you
don't really know the outcome of beforehand.

Yes, but I would maintain there's often a difference (and definitely in
this case) between "knowing what you're doing" and knowing what
the results are going to be.

Bob M.

 

[Dr Ivan D. Reid]

On 3 Jul 2005 17:33:04 -0700, The Flavored Coffee Guy <elgersmad@rock.com>
wrote in <1120437184.125114.297720@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:

non-fissle isotopes

"fissle"? Like your ideas, they'll fizzle, maybe.

--
Ivan Reid, Electronic & Computer Engineering, ___ CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

 

[Bob Monsen]

Bob Myers wrote:

"Bob Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iZCdnXI73e31SFDfRVn-tQ@comcast.com...

No, all the evidence is that NASA/JPL knew precisely what they
were doing in this case.

Bob M.



Well, the point of research is to do things in a controlled way that you
don't really know the outcome of beforehand.


Yes, but I would maintain there's often a difference (and definitely in
this case) between "knowing what you're doing" and knowing what
the results are going to be.

Bob M.

Agreed. They certainly have the technical ability to pull it off, and
they showed that brilliantly.

--
Regards,
Bob Monsen

If a little knowledge is dangerous, where is the man who has
so much as to be out of danger?
Thomas Henry Huxley, 1877

 

[The Flavored Coffee Guy]

Ignorance is bliss, pretend I'm not here.

 

[Larry W. Jewell]

Redundant orders not necessary.

As I was going down the stair,
I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today,
I wish, I wish he'd go away."

Ogden Nash, debunker.

The Flavored Coffee Guy wrote:

Ignorance is bliss, pretend I'm not here.

--
Contact me: larry w jewell @ hotmail . com (remove spaces, of course)

 

[The Flavored Coffee Guy]

There isn't many inventive thinkers here. If I used unstable isotopes,
at that velocity, mass, and managed an impact of equal potential, would
by far be able to construct a more effecient bomb. To consider the
potential of avoiding collisions, and the usability of such a device in
an act of war becomes impossible by design. The Earth's atmosphere is
too thick, and if there were any heat shields, the bomb couldn't
detonate or burn up in the atmosphere. In the otherhand, utilized for
the purpose of intent, to steer an meteorite, or asteroid away from the
Earth, would allow us to build bombs that were of a much higher yeild,
and only usable for that purpose.

The pressures achieved on impact, are much higher than any pyrotechnic
could achieve. The velocity is a result of expending a very large
quanitity of pyrotechnics to achieve that velocity over time. Time and
experimentation my prove that the quality of the fissle materials
required are not even of weapons grade in comparison to those now
utilized with pyrotechnics here on the planet for no other purpose
except war. Because, the function of velocity, and pressure of impact
are so much higher, than the blasts used to detonate a nuclear bomb.

 

[Fred Abse]

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 14:54:29 -0500, Larry W. Jewell wrote:

As I was going down the stair,
I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today,
I wish, I wish he'd go away."

Ogden Nash, debunker.

I think that was A. A. Milne, rather than Ogden Nash.

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)

 

[John Fields]

On 10 Jul 2005 12:52:43 -0700, "The Flavored Coffee Guy"
<elgersmad@rock.com> wrote:

Ignorance is bliss, pretend I'm not here.

---
If ignorance is bliss, then you're not here, you're in nirvana.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[Rich Webb]

What is it that you use to flavor your coffee? You might consider a
toxicological screening.

--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA