decoder

M

Max

Guest
I write the following decoder:

ce <= "0001" when addr = "0--" else
"0010" when addr = "10-" else
"0100" when addr = "110" else
"1000";

it doesn't work.

Then I tried this one:

ce <= "0001" when addr(2) = '0' else
"0010" when addr(2 downto 1) = "10" else
"0100" when addr = "110" else
"1000";

this work.

why the first version doesn't work?
the symbol '-' means "don't care", isn't it? So why it is wrong?
I prefer something like the first version since is less cryptic.

thanks
 
Max wrote:
I write the following decoder:

ce <= "0001" when addr = "0--" else
"0010" when addr = "10-" else
"0100" when addr = "110" else
"1000";

it doesn't work.

Then I tried this one:

ce <= "0001" when addr(2) = '0' else
"0010" when addr(2 downto 1) = "10" else
"0100" when addr = "110" else
"1000";

this work.

why the first version doesn't work?
the symbol '-' means "don't care", isn't it? So why it is wrong?
I prefer something like the first version since is less cryptic.

thanks
I am interested by this issue. Which compiler are you using?

Laurent Gauch
www.amontec.com
 
In the package std_logic_1164 the type std_(u)logic is declared.
For this type implicitly an overloaded function for "=" is declared. This
function is straightforward. In case left and right is exactly te same the
result is true.
And I think you did not expect this behavior?

Now for type std_logic the interpretation of '-' is dont care.
This omission is repaired in the package NUMERIC_STD with the std_match
function.
The next example will have the expected behavior (I hope).

LIBRARY ieee;
USE ieee.std_logic_1164.ALL;
USE ieee.numeric_std.ALL;
ENTITY decoder IS
PORT (addr : std_logic_vector(2 DOWNTO 0);
ce : OUT std_logic_vector(3 DOWNTO 0));
END decoder;

ARCHITECTURE beh OF decoder IS
BEGIN
ce <= "0001" when std_match(addr, "0--") else
"0010" when std_match(addr, "10-") else
"0100" when std_match(addr, "110") else
"1000";
END beh;

Sometimes (often) you see the use of the package std_logic_unsigned or
std_logic_signed. These packages include also an overloaded function "=" for
std_logic_vector. However if you write:
LIBRARY ieee;
USE ieee.std_logic_1164.ALL;
USE ieee.std_logic_unsigned.ALL; -- not an ieee package!
Then there are two overloaded function for "="; the one implicitly defined
in std_logic_1164 and the explict one in std_logic_unsigned.
A VHDL compliant tool should complain .. but some tools support it (the
explicit declaration is used). Sometimes there is a compiler option
("explicit declaration").

If the decoder is large you could also try another apporach. Although the
behaviour is not the same it may give you some ideas:

LIBRARY ieee;
USE ieee.std_logic_1164.ALL;
ENTITY bin2dec IS
GENERIC (width : natural := 3);
PORT (a : IN std_logic_vector( width-1 DOWNTO 0);
b : OUT std_logic_vector ( 2**width-1 DOWNTO 0));
END bin2dec;

LIBRARY ieee;
USE ieee.numeric_std.ALL;
ARCHITECTURE demo OF bin2dec IS
BEGIN
PROCESS (a)
BEGIN
b<=(OTHERS=>'0');
b(to_integer(unsigned(a)))<='1';
END PROCESS;
END demo;

Egbert Molenkamp


"Max" <cialdi@firenze.net> schreef in bericht
news:8e077568.0309090613.6114a4b9@posting.google.com...
I write the following decoder:

ce <= "0001" when addr = "0--" else
"0010" when addr = "10-" else
"0100" when addr = "110" else
"1000";

it doesn't work.

Then I tried this one:

ce <= "0001" when addr(2) = '0' else
"0010" when addr(2 downto 1) = "10" else
"0100" when addr = "110" else
"1000";

this work.

why the first version doesn't work?
the symbol '-' means "don't care", isn't it? So why it is wrong?
I prefer something like the first version since is less cryptic.

thanks
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top