Guest
When the average amplitude is non zero then the problem arises is
______________????
______________????
R
Rich Webb
Guest
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:51:06 -0800 (PST), sirfmereliay@googlemail.com
wrote:
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
wrote:
Oh, I love puzzles. How many letters? Sounds like?
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:51:06 -0800 (PST), sirfmereliay@googlemail.com
wrote:
Wrong major. Consider art history, or journalism.
John
wrote:
Wrong major. Consider art history, or journalism.
John
J
Jasen Betts
Guest
On 2008-11-13, sirfmereliay@googlemail.com <sirfmereliay@googlemail.com> wrote:
it doesn't work well with transformers.
it charges up line capacitance and makes the line harder to drive correctly.
it wastes energy
Ther's no universal show-stoppers to this as evidenced by the popularity of
signalling schemes like RS-232, RS-488, MIDI, and Analogue Telephone.
but
--
In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share
a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra
and are looking for a new relationship
here's three, there are others.
it doesn't work well with transformers.
it charges up line capacitance and makes the line harder to drive correctly.
it wastes energy
Ther's no universal show-stoppers to this as evidenced by the popularity of
signalling schemes like RS-232, RS-488, MIDI, and Analogue Telephone.
but
--
In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share
a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra
and are looking for a new relationship
D
David L. Jones
Guest
<sirfmereliay@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:fdb2fdc8-5398-4aaa-a36c-4c30c1a11bf9@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Dave.
news:fdb2fdc8-5398-4aaa-a36c-4c30c1a11bf9@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Can I buy a vowel?
Dave.
P
Peter Hucker
Guest
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:28:08 -0000, David L. Jones <altzone@gmail.com> wrote:
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com
A thousand monkeys pounding on a thousand keyboards will eventually produce either the bible, or a system error.
http://hucker.plus.com/videos/People/countdown_cunundrom.swf
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com
A thousand monkeys pounding on a thousand keyboards will eventually produce either the bible, or a system error.
J
John Fields
Guest
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:23:40 -0000, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com>
wrote:
The way I heard it was they'd produce the Encyclopedia Britannica, and I
think they've already done it.
JF
wrote:
---
The way I heard it was they'd produce the Encyclopedia Britannica, and I
think they've already done it.
JF
I
IanM
Guest
John Fields wrote:
actually produced Wikipedia.On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:23:40 -0000, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
A thousand monkeys pounding on a thousand keyboards will eventually
produce either the bible, or a system error.
---
The way I heard it was they'd produce the Encyclopedia Britannica, and I
think they've already done it.
JF
No, thats a respected source edited by identifiable humans. The monkeys
P
Peter Hucker
Guest
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:35:25 -0000, IanM <Invalid@totally.invalid> wrote:
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com
Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.
Wikipedia is free, I can't respect things they charge for!John Fields wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:23:40 -0000, "Peter Hucker" <none@spam.com
wrote:
A thousand monkeys pounding on a thousand keyboards will eventually
produce either the bible, or a system error.
---
The way I heard it was they'd produce the Encyclopedia Britannica, and I
think they've already done it.
JF
No, thats a respected source edited by identifiable humans. The monkeys
actually produced Wikipedia.
--
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com
Nevertheless, the speaker-hearer's linguistic intuition is not to be
considered in determining the traditional practice of grammarians. Thus a
subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not
subject to the strong generative capacity of the theory. Of course, the
notion of level of grammaticalness is necessary to impose an interpretation
on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance
scope of a complex symbol. Conversely, any associated supporting element is
to be regarded as an abstract underlying order. Furthermore, this analysis
of a formative as a pair of sets of features does not readily tolerate
irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules.