C
Christian Haase
Guest
Hello,
has anybody ever used the configuration clause in designs
synthesized with XST?
I have a top-module that hides another moduleX (with a component
module_component) that contains a clause like
for all : module_component use entity work.module_1(implementation);
in the declarative part of the architecture. Module_component implements
the functionality of moduleX.
After synthesizing module_1 ... module_n the synthesis of top-module
generates a black box for moduleX. When I change the clause to use
another module_n for module_component XST doesn't recognize that change.
(I run the incremental design flow where changes are indicated by a
refresh of the design in low level synthesis)
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Christian
has anybody ever used the configuration clause in designs
synthesized with XST?
I have a top-module that hides another moduleX (with a component
module_component) that contains a clause like
for all : module_component use entity work.module_1(implementation);
in the declarative part of the architecture. Module_component implements
the functionality of moduleX.
After synthesizing module_1 ... module_n the synthesis of top-module
generates a black box for moduleX. When I change the clause to use
another module_n for module_component XST doesn't recognize that change.
(I run the incremental design flow where changes are indicated by a
refresh of the design in low level synthesis)
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Christian