Complex Bit Index Syntax, does this exist?

[Alex]

I'm trying to find if there's a syntax for this (this doesn't work):

OUTPUT_BIT <= ((value1_4bit & value2_4bit) - value3_8bit) (7);

In summary, .. in a single statement, combining two 4 bit values,
subtracting an 8bit value from them, and getting the most significant
bit of the result. Is there a way to synthesize this outside of a
process statement?

If it matters, i'm using Xilinx ISE 8.2.03i.

Thanks,

Alex McHale

 

[Andy]

Why do you need this in one statement?

It will likely be more self-documenting and easier to maintain if you
can use more than one statement, and put them in a function if
necessary i.e. for an initial value, etc.

Also, are these signed are unsigned quantities? If unsigned, is the
result of the subtraction guaraneed to be non-negative, or do you care?


Knowing that, I could probably come up with a cryptic expression
(almost as cryptic as the one you tried) that would give it to you in
one statement, but then you, and more importantly the next poor sap
that has to maintain your design, would not know what was being done.

Andy


Alex wrote:

I'm trying to find if there's a syntax for this (this doesn't work):

OUTPUT_BIT <= ((value1_4bit & value2_4bit) - value3_8bit) (7);

In summary, .. in a single statement, combining two 4 bit values,
subtracting an 8bit value from them, and getting the most significant
bit of the result. Is there a way to synthesize this outside of a
process statement?

If it matters, i'm using Xilinx ISE 8.2.03i.

Thanks,

Alex McHale

 

[Jonathan Bromley]

On 16 Oct 2006 12:03:14 -0700, "Alex" <alexmchale@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm trying to find if there's a syntax for this (this doesn't work):

OUTPUT_BIT <= ((value1_4bit & value2_4bit) - value3_8bit) (7);

In summary, .. in a single statement, combining two 4 bit values,
subtracting an 8bit value from them, and getting the most significant
bit of the result. Is there a way to synthesize this outside of a
process statement?

You can't subscript an expression, only an object. Make an
intermediate signal or variable to hold the result, and subscript
that. It'll synthesise just as well, and as Andy said it will be
easier to understand.

Alternatively, if the vectors are all of SIGNED data type, you
could simply test the result's sign:

OUTPUT_BIT <= '1' when
((value1_4bit & value2_4bit) - value3_8bit) < 0
else '0';

and in some situations that might be even clearer.
--
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant

DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services

Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK
jonathan.bromley@MYCOMPANY.com
http://www.MYCOMPANY.com

The contents of this message may contain personal views which
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.