R
rajan
Guest
Dear colleagues,
I need to find out that which verification tool would be better
(overall) for the (Co)-Verification of the SoC/ASIC. We are thinking
of making comparison between Seamless and Quickturn/Cadence product
i.e. Cobalt.
I know Cobalt has certain benefits such as: faster speed, Higher
capacity.
But still I need to know the following:
- complexity in setting-up the environment (Seamless&Specman both)
- User friendly
- Nature of the results (% wrong values in result)
- Effort required to make the environment working for simulation
- Whether valid for synchronous designs only or more
- Debug capability
I will really appreciate help from the gurus of the
design/verification community.
Best regards,
rajan
I need to find out that which verification tool would be better
(overall) for the (Co)-Verification of the SoC/ASIC. We are thinking
of making comparison between Seamless and Quickturn/Cadence product
i.e. Cobalt.
I know Cobalt has certain benefits such as: faster speed, Higher
capacity.
But still I need to know the following:
- complexity in setting-up the environment (Seamless&Specman both)
- User friendly
- Nature of the results (% wrong values in result)
- Effort required to make the environment working for simulation
- Whether valid for synchronous designs only or more
- Debug capability
I will really appreciate help from the gurus of the
design/verification community.
Best regards,
rajan