CMOS D Flip Flop

R

Ranjith

Guest
Hello Everyone,

This question is wrt CMOS. I am building a D flip flop in 0.35 micron
technology in B2SPICE.

I wanted to know WHY D flip flop built using Transmission gate is
better than those using Nand Gates?

Is it just because the transmission gate transfers both logic 0 and 1,
efficiently? or there is something more than that?

Regards,
ranair123
student
 
On 25 Mar 2004 11:39:24 -0800, ranair123@softhome.net (Ranjith) wrote:

Hello Everyone,

This question is wrt CMOS. I am building a D flip flop in 0.35 micron
technology in B2SPICE.

I wanted to know WHY D flip flop built using Transmission gate is
better than those using Nand Gates?

Is it just because the transmission gate transfers both logic 0 and 1,
efficiently? or there is something more than that?

Regards,
ranair123
student
What is the definition of "better". My experience is that all-gate
versions perform better with sloppy clock edges.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Throughout the history of this great country there have actually
been people of only two political persuasions: fighters and cowards.
WE MUST NOT LET THE LATTER PREVAIL IN THE NEXT ELECTION!
 
Ranjith wrote:
Hello Everyone,

This question is wrt CMOS. I am building a D flip flop in 0.35 micron
technology in B2SPICE.

I wanted to know WHY D flip flop built using Transmission gate is
better than those using Nand Gates?
faster, smaller number of transistors
 
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:45:16 -0700, MikeM <trashcan@yahoo.com> wrote:

Ranjith wrote:
Hello Everyone,

This question is wrt CMOS. I am building a D flip flop in 0.35 micron
technology in B2SPICE.

I wanted to know WHY D flip flop built using Transmission gate is
better than those using Nand Gates?

faster, smaller number of transistors
I'd guess better metastability performance, too.

John
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top