Climate Change Bullshit...

Off-topic troll...

--
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

Path: not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: Climate Change Bullshit
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:17:39 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <pu07vj$s5$2@dont-email.me
References: <pteecn$t1e$1@dont-email.me> <ptf21e$18q$2@dont-email.me
hi6mvd1kmes97rr6h5511djl7f80lltohe@4ax.com> <ptg5qm$9kt$1@dont-email.me
StadnSpCAMwNsGHGnZ2dnUU78V3NnZ2d@brightview.co.uk
ptj45b$oad$1@dont-email.me> <ptk685$2v4$4@dont-email.me
I3hLD.340357$kh6.161917@fx32.am4> <ptkdf7$m5b$1@dont-email.me
1FtLD.412080$px6.88895@usenetxs.com
281120181252038286%timstreater@greenbee.net
GYwLD.141581$lKb.110443@fx15.am4
281120181411314362%timstreater@greenbee.net
ytyLD.830867$NF7.134280@fx14.am4
wuqdnbQyvuvI9pzBnZ2dnUU7-UnNnZ2d@giganews.com> <ptte0o$p50$1@dont-email.me
M4sMD.124534$eX5.43295@fx06.am4> <g6fumgFu0l0U1@mid.individual.net
EJzMD.758249$aw7.748088@fx04.am4> <g6g5gkFv3fU1@mid.individual.net
NmDMD.344300$T01.40530@fx08.am4> <g6glfpF4cilU1@mid.individual.net
yMMMD.276216$Do.52341@fx31.am4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 09:17:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host=\"87086762d484df5ebf9da99abe383040\";
logging-data=\"901\"; mail-complaints-to=\"abuse@eternal-september.org\"; posting-account=\"U2FsdGVkX1+OT07+LlGJRVaWYTOWC9P50f6LnN31he8=\"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.2.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OhBbftK3LFQME+N9A+n9kIU0hHQ=
In-Reply-To: <yMMMD.276216$Do.52341@fx31.am4
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Received-Bytes: 2609
X-Received-Body-CRC: 1240052191

On 02/12/2018 08:32, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 01/12/18 23:57, Rod Speed wrote:


\"Tom Gardner\" <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:NmDMD.344300$T01.40530@fx08.am4...

I\'m glad you recognise your previous error, viz about us not living
in a democracy.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

A typically coherent and convincing argument from a brexiteer.

Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian trolll and arsehole
and if you havent plonked him, that makes you one too.

--
It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain
 
See also these Jake Isks (aka John Doe) troll nym-shift names:

John Doe <always.look@message.header>
John <look@post.header>
Judge Dredd <always.look@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Mother\" <always.see@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Father\" <always.see@post.header>
Edward Hernandez Loves Porn <always.view@post.header>

Jake Isks (aka John Doe troll) claiming it has never nym-shifted on
Usenet: http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165248158300

Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 76.1% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 3605 articles to USENET. Of which 176 have been pure insults and
2566 have been Troll Doe \"troll format\" postings.

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 14 Jul 2022 22:45:54 GMT in
message-id <C01AK.328994$LfE9.162954@usenetxs.com>.

5qzXGARQ7T4/
 
On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 2:16:43 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
According to the NASA site, atmospheric C02 is currently at 400ppm (0.04)
and rising exponentially (and some)...

https://tinyurl.com/y7afhl94

However, according to \'A Compendium of Chemistry\' by Arnold & Mandel
(1914)...

\"The amount of carbon dioxide in the air amounts on average to 0.04
volume percent [400ppm], but may rise to one or two percent in rooms
occupied by many persons or by the burning of many gas flames; experience
has shown that it is not advisable to have more than 0.1 volume percent
in a room for habitation. The purity of the air can be determined by
estimating the amount of carbon dioxide contained therein.\"

What Arnold& Mandel don\'t mention explicity, but is clear from the context, is that they meant indoor air.

If Cursitor Doom wasn\'t a complete idiot he\'s be aware that the air analysis techniques used in 1914 were wet way chemistry, and not all that sensitive, accurate or quick.

When Charles Keeling started his work he got hold of a machine that measured the amount of narrow band infrared radiation absorbed by a sample of atmospheric air, which meant that he could take accurate measurements fast.

Once he could do that he realised that he had to sample the air he looked at a long way from human activity if he wanted to get stable and consistent measurements, something that hadn\'t been noticed back in 1914.

So despite NASA\'s rather alarming looking graph, the amount of atmospheric CO2 is the same today as it was over 100 years ago.

It isn\'t.

> It\'s only by referring to very old books written before the climate change agenda was drawn up

And ignoring the actual information they provide in favour of moronic misapprehensions about what that data actually means

> that we can see the \'man-made global warming\' meme is based on nothing but LIES.

If you are as dedicated to fooling yourself as Cursitor Doom you can see whatever you want to see, and lie to yourself about what your \"evidence\" means.

> If anyone I haven\'t plonked wants a scan of the original page from the 1914 volume I\'m happy to supply it via email.

Complete with his deluded ideas about it\'s imagined significance.

>This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol.

You will look like a half-wit if you don\'t mention that it is deluded nonsense.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 5:29:27 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2018 08:21:37 -0800, bloggs.fredbloggs.fred wrote:

\"Errors in the determination of CO2 by many methods reported in the
literature are so large that they exceed its normal concentration in the
atmosphere [2, 3]. The majority of methods are suitable only for the
determination of increased concentrations of CO2 in air,
e.g., for the estimation of the degree of gas contamination of rooms in
plant workshops, the concentration of CO2 in vegetable stores, in fires,
etc. \"

http://agmalygin.narod.ru/JAC16.pdf
From the link you posted I read the following:-

\"The determination of carbon dioxide in air was
always an important practical problem. It became par-
ticularly important in recent decades because of the
studies of the greenhouse effect.\"

All you are doing is proving my point, though!
Of course \'they\' are going to attempt to debunk and undermine historical
sources which quote the proportion of CO2 in the atmosphere where they
contradict the \'official narrative\' that levels are skyrocketing due to
the activities of man.
The only way to get unbiased information on the subject is to consult the
physical, hard-copy literature of 100+ years ago, because everything
subsequent to that has to be regarded as potentially compromised for
political reasons.

Greenland and Antarctic ice core data is pretty reliable, but since we didn\'t pull out the ice ores until the 1990\'s, Cursitor Doom imagines that the people looking at the ice cores were fiddling the data as they extracted it.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Friday, July 15, 2022 at 8:46:00 AM UTC+10, Judge Dredd wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 02/12/2018 08:32, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 01/12/18 23:57, Rod Speed wrote:
\"Tom Gardner\" <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:NmDMD.344300$T01....@fx08.am4...

I\'m glad you recognise your previous error, viz about us not living in a democracy.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

A typically coherent and convincing argument from a brexiteer.

Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian troll and arsehole and if you haven\'t plonked him, that makes you one too.

It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain

Jake Isks hasn\'t notice that this is a three-year old thread.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Friday, 15 July 2022 at 03:35:48 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, July 15, 2022 at 8:46:00 AM UTC+10, Judge Dredd wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 02/12/2018 08:32, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 01/12/18 23:57, Rod Speed wrote:
\"Tom Gardner\" <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:NmDMD.344300$T01....@fx08.am4...

I\'m glad you recognise your previous error, viz about us not living in a democracy.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

A typically coherent and convincing argument from a brexiteer.

Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian troll and arsehole and if you haven\'t plonked him, that makes you one too.

It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain
Jake Isks hasn\'t notice that this is a three-year old thread.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Climate Change should read
Climate Changes = an ancient tautology by Heraclitus
Everything flows , Panta Rhei



“Everything flows



“Panta Rhei,” commonly translated as “Everything flows,” is the most famous aphorism attributed to the presocratic philosopher. Although at first, it may not appear that deep, Heraclitus’ remark is one of the most profound and influential sayings in the history of western civilization. So, what did Heraclitus exactly mean?
Panta Rhei: What Did Heraclitus Mean? - TheColl…
thecollector.com
The formula panta rhei (Greek : πάντα ῥεῖ, \"everything flows\") is an aphorism traced back to the Greek philosopher Heraclitus, but created
 
On Friday, July 15, 2022 at 6:59:11 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Friday, 15 July 2022 at 03:35:48 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, July 15, 2022 at 8:46:00 AM UTC+10, Judge Dredd wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 02/12/2018 08:32, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 01/12/18 23:57, Rod Speed wrote:
\"Tom Gardner\" <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:NmDMD.344300$T01....@fx08.am4...

I\'m glad you recognise your previous error, viz about us not living in a democracy.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

A typically coherent and convincing argument from a brexiteer.

Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian troll and arsehole and if you haven\'t plonked him, that makes you one too.

It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain

Jake Isks hasn\'t notice that this is a three-year-old thread.

Climate Change should read
Climate Changes = an ancient tautology by Heraclitus
Everything flows , Panta Rhei

A a is an ignorant half-wit, quite as silly as Cursitor Doom.

“Everything flows

“Panta Rhei,” commonly translated as “Everything flows,” is the most famous aphorism attributed to the presocratic philosopher. Although at first, it may not appear that deep, Heraclitus’ remark is one of the most profound and influential sayings in the history of western civilization.

According to a a.

So, what did Heraclitus exactly mean?
Panta Rhei: What Did Heraclitus Mean? - TheColl…
thecollector.com
The formula panta rhei (Greek : πάντα ῥεῖ, \"everything flows\") is an aphorism traced back to the Greek philosopher Heraclitus.

Sadly for a a, \"climate change\" isn\'t a superficial observation about the weather one day being different from the next, but rather an extremely precise series of observation about specific aspects of the atmosphere that suggest that is changing rapidly enough to be worrying as a direct consequence of us burning a lot of fossil carbon.

Heraclitus would not have known what we meant by fossil carbon, so his observations aren\'t exactly germane. Cursitor Doom started this thread back in November 2018 with an equally stupid claim.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Friday, 15 July 2022 at 13:48:46 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, July 15, 2022 at 6:59:11 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
On Friday, 15 July 2022 at 03:35:48 UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, July 15, 2022 at 8:46:00 AM UTC+10, Judge Dredd wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 02/12/2018 08:32, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 01/12/18 23:57, Rod Speed wrote:
\"Tom Gardner\" <spam...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:NmDMD.344300$T01....@fx08.am4...

I\'m glad you recognise your previous error, viz about us not living in a democracy.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.

A typically coherent and convincing argument from a brexiteer.

Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian troll and arsehole and if you haven\'t plonked him, that makes you one too.

It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain

Jake Isks hasn\'t notice that this is a three-year-old thread.

Climate Change should read
Climate Changes = an ancient tautology by Heraclitus
Everything flows , Panta Rhei
A a is an ignorant half-wit, quite as silly as Cursitor Doom.
“Everything flows

“Panta Rhei,” commonly translated as “Everything flows,” is the most famous aphorism attributed to the presocratic philosopher. Although at first, it may not appear that deep, Heraclitus’ remark is one of the most profound and influential sayings in the history of western civilization.
According to a a.
So, what did Heraclitus exactly mean?
Panta Rhei: What Did Heraclitus Mean? - TheColl…
thecollector.com
The formula panta rhei (Greek : πάντα ῥεῖ, \"everything flows\") is an aphorism traced back to the Greek philosopher Heraclitus.

Sadly for a a, \"climate change\" isn\'t a superficial observation about the weather one day being different from the next, but rather an extremely precise series of observation about specific aspects of the atmosphere that suggest that is changing rapidly enough to be worrying as a direct consequence of us burning a lot of fossil carbon.

Heraclitus would not have known what we meant by fossil carbon, so his observations aren\'t exactly germane. Cursitor Doom started this thread back in November 2018 with an equally stupid claim.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Australia is dead horse today and totally collapsed on covid19

#GlobalWarming is an old fake by Al Gore, Prof. Mann, IPCC, UNFCC
to make easy money, selling delusiones

Climate Changes are due to fluctuations in solar activity, never studied by fake scienc e, since climate fakers never studied astronomy.

If you represent Low-Science contact
Professor Ed Hawkins
Ed Hawkins
for advice

and stop your bullshit
----

• Professor of climate science

• Academic Lead for Public Engagement in Department of Meteorology

• Principal Research Scientist in NCAS

• Editor of Climate Lab Book blog
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top