Chip with simple program for Toy

[Lord Garth]

<hboothe@gte.net> wrote in message
news:1110946896.988314.168770@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

Um, Hello, my name is HC and I'm an Idiot. <sigh

If you hook up the LM317 just like the technotes document from National
says to, running Vin to 13.8 volts, and Out to the load, but you
MISPLACE the wire on the breadboard to the Adj pin, so that the
connection that is supposed to exist between the Adj pin and the load
does NOT exist, it runs basically straight 13.8 volts (Vin voltage) to
the load. :-/ I went to start on my constant voltage regulator and
was pulling wires off the breadboard and saw that I had missed placing
the Adj wire connection in the right row, it was one row off...and I
had not seen it. I hooked it up right and it's putting out 120 mA like
it should. Now the question is whether or not that'll burn that
battery out because 120 mA is more than it draws at idle...but at least
I'm now in the right range.

Sorry folks, sometimes I just screw stuff up.

--HC

Good, now knock the voltage down to 2.8V and you are good to go!
Yeah, I have seen 1200mAH batteries too so 120mA is good .1C rate
to charge your batteries. Just keep that time limit in mind, 16 hrs max
or stop when the cell warms up.

 

[Rich Grise]

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:08:37 -0500, fengjianqing wrote:

Yes! Sure! If you can give!

Microwave Oven with the Door Hinge at the Operator's Right-Hand Side,
And Control Panel and Door Opening at the Operator's Left.
Copyright (c) 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Richard M. Grise.

Use email richardgrise@yahoo.com but elide ard, leaving nicknamesurname.

Thanks!
Rich

 

[Roger Johansson]

Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net> wrote:

Microwave Oven with the Door Hinge at the Operator's Right-Hand Side,
And Control Panel and Door Opening at the Operator's Left.

It is a bit strange if "leftie" versions are not produced already,
considering that different kitchen layouts may need such versions, and
there is probably a market for lefthanders.



--
Roger J.

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:32:45 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<Paul@Hovnanian.com> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

[snip]

Notice that Ippolito took it upon _himself_ to stop a legal
transmission which I'm paying good money to supposedly be able to do.

What do y'all think about that?

I think it's unconscionable. Tearing people a new a*hole for posting
test messages in this group is OUR job, not his.

;-)

---
Precisely!-)

--
John Fields

 

[JeffM]

fengjianqing wrote (without context:

Yes! Sure! If you can give!

People have been asking you to include part of the previous post in
your post.

Here are the guidelines for posting to Usenet:
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:8PaSp2kKbWoJ:www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html+just-enough+at-*-top-*-*-message+do-not-*-*-*-original
Look at the highlighted portion first.

 

[Active8]

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:14:40 -0600, John Fields wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:08:01 -0500, "fengjianqing"
fjq@qingdaonews.com> wrote:

NO!

---
Please leave a little bit of the message you're replying to in your
reply so we can see what you're replying to.

Thank you! I had to go back.

How do you know?

In the case of the US, have you searched the USPTO's archives for
possible infringement from each of your products for at least
seventeen years prior to the date you announced that that product was
available?

Is it seventeen now? I get patent and trademark times messed up. I
though one of them was up to 20 yrs.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On 18 Mar 2005 21:02:09 -0800, JeffM wrote:

fengjianqing wrote (without context:
Yes! Sure! If you can give!

People have been asking you to include part of the previous post in
your post.

But he posted both messages at the same time and John's request came
later.

Monkey see, monkey do is the way. It's either his first usenet
experience, or he's not very observant.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:05:42 GMT, Rich Grise wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:08:37 -0500, fengjianqing wrote:

Yes! Sure! If you can give!

Microwave Oven with the Door Hinge at the Operator's Right-Hand Side,
And Control Panel and Door Opening at the Operator's Left.
Copyright (c) 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Richard M. Grise.

You may protect your words with that, but not your ideas.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Jonathan Kirwan]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:30:17 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote:

Followups to SEB, please.

When you reply to a x-posted article, does your reader warn you that
you're x-posting?

Yep. Asks me if I want to allow them all or just to the group I'm
currently viewing.

When you reply to this, do you get a warning that a followup flag
was set?

Nope. It just puts me there.

Does your reader automatically honor the followup flag, i.e., only
set the groups line to that followup group?

Yes.

What's your reader?

Forte Agent.

Do you give a damn?

I might.

Jon

 

[JeffM]

fengjianqing wrote (without context:
Yes! Sure! If you can give!

People have been asking you
to include part of the previous post in your post.
JeffM

It's either his first usenet experience, or he's not very observant.
Mike (Active8)

Both, I think. The totality of his Usenet posts:
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?enc_author=WR7E7BMAAAAU2oLLYI1j523EAGhmHFS1WMj6vob75xS36mXc24h6ww

 

[Active8]

On 19 Mar 2005 00:53:05 -0800, JeffM wrote:

fengjianqing wrote (without context:
Yes! Sure! If you can give!

People have been asking you
to include part of the previous post in your post.
JeffM

I'm putting a sentence back in for context:

Monkey see, monkey do is the way.
It's either his first usenet experience, or he's not very observant.
Mike (Active8)

Both, I think. The totality of his Usenet posts:
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?enc_author=WR7E7BMAAAAU2oLLYI1j523EAGhmHFS1WMj6vob75xS36mXc24h6ww

Good research and conclusion, Sam Spade. So he's *lower* than a
monkey.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:06:02 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:14:40 -0600, John Fields wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:08:01 -0500, "fengjianqing"
fjq@qingdaonews.com> wrote:

NO!

---
Please leave a little bit of the message you're replying to in your
reply so we can see what you're replying to.

Thank you! I had to go back.

How do you know?

In the case of the US, have you searched the USPTO's archives for
possible infringement from each of your products for at least
seventeen years prior to the date you announced that that product was
available?

Is it seventeen now? I get patent and trademark times messed up. I
though one of them was up to 20 yrs.

---
You're right; it's 20 years. Thanks.

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2700_2701.htm#sect2701

--
John Fields

 

[Fred Abse]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:30:17 -0500, Active8 wrote:

Followups to SEB, please.

When you reply to a x-posted article, does your reader warn you that
you're x-posting?

Only if I forget to set followup.

When you reply to this, do you get a warning that a followup flag
was set?

No.

Does your reader automatically honor the followup flag, i.e., only
set the groups line to that followup group?

Yes..

What's your reader?

Pan, the only news client I know of to pass all GNKSA guidelines.

Do you give a damn?

Frankly, my dear, yes

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)

 

[Active8]

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:54:23 -0500, fengjianqing wrote:

Why you can see so many websites have flash. Because the servicer tell to
the owner of the website-- the flash is beautiful and wonderful for
others' first eye to see you website. And from this feather the servicer
company can earn more.

For the beginning business with China, I also 100% agree you should take
care about the quality, the price, the time... But if you do not to try
you do not know, you will lose chance. More and more company purchase
directly from China. Why? It is not only because the lower price, also
because you pay the lower money you can get the same quality products or
the higher quality. This is true!
So at first give yourself chance to try. You will earn from China.

Hey China. Start buying more stuff from the US.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[James Meyer]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:30:17 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net> wroth:

Followups to SEB, please.

Screw you. I'll post whatever I want wherever I want.

When you reply to a x-posted article, does your reader warn you that
you're x-posting?

I don't give a damn. My pipe tobacco gives me a warning that the state
of California had determined that smoking it will produce birth defects. I
still smoke it. Besides, if I get pregnant, I've got bigger problems than birth
defects.

When you reply to this, do you get a warning that a followup flag
was set?

I don't give a damn. What's a followup flag?

Does your reader automatically honor the followup flag, i.e., only
set the groups line to that followup group?

I don't give a damn. My reader doesn't bother me and I don't try to
second guess or micro manage it.

What's your reader?

Read the header information and figure it out for yourself.

Do you give a damn?

Obviously not.

Jim

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:30:17 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote:

Followups to SEB, please.

When you reply to a x-posted article, does your reader warn you that
you're x-posting?

Yes.

When you reply to this, do you get a warning that a followup flag
was set?

No. Only one newsgroup was shown.

Does your reader automatically honor the followup flag, i.e., only
set the groups line to that followup group?

What's your reader?

Agent v1.93

Do you give a damn?

Not really, although I do get irritated by those who clamor over
cross-posting. Good news-readers, such as Agent, only show one
instance of a cross-post. Why is it some people want to use archaic
tools and then bitch like it's my problem that their tools don't stand
up -) to the challenge?

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

 

[HC]

Hmm, okay, I'll try that. I won't be able to do so for a couple of
days (other problems/projects), but I'll let you know when I do.

Thanks again for your time and help.

--HC

 

[Active8]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:17:06 +0000, Fred Abse wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:30:17 -0500, Active8 wrote:

Followups to SEB, please.

When you reply to a x-posted article, does your reader warn you that
you're x-posting?

Only if I forget to set followup.

The followup flag should have been set by the poster you're replying
to. <== f grammar.

When you reply to this, do you get a warning that a followup flag
was set?

No.

What about when you click send? My fault, wrong original question.

Does your reader automatically honor the followup flag, i.e., only
set the groups line to that followup group?

Yes..


What's your reader?

Pan, the only news client I know of to pass all GNKSA guidelines.

User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.90 (A Bouquet of Corpses) -- Rich has a gal
crawling across the kitchen table. I'll be sure to use it when ever
I get a current Linux.
<snip>
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Active8]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:51:54 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
<snip>

Do you give a damn?

Not really, although I do get irritated by those who clamor over
cross-posting. Good news-readers, such as Agent, only show one
instance of a cross-post. Why is it some people want to use archaic
tools and then bitch like it's my problem that their tools don't stand
up -) to the challenge?

I hope you're not referring to me and I'm not bitching about you.
Mine has crosspost management settings (mark it read, don't retrive,
etc.) and I can turn off the warnings. I was just wondering what
other people's clients did. I leave the warnings on to remind me not
to reply to, for instance Rich, and have it end up in the wicca or
witchcraft groups. No need dragging any replies from those people
back here No. I'm not afraid of witches. I don't imagine you want
me inviting them here, either.
--
Best Regards,
Mike

 

[Bob Masta]

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:50:47 -0500, Active8 <reply2group@ndbbm.net>
wrote:

Hey China. Start buying more stuff from the US.

Ahhh, *besides* T-bills. At the rate China is buying up
US debt, we are losing any semblance of influence over
them. And at the rate Dubya is running up debt in his
quest to make the world safe for Big Business, he may
just as well mail the keys to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave
over to Bejing.




Bob Masta
dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom

D A Q A R T A
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com