A
a a
Guest
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plai...
A
a a
Guest
>
Yet one more #veryStupidByLowIQaa post.
Yet one more #veryStupidByLowIQaa post.
F
Fred Bloggs
Guest
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 6:12:52â¯PM UTC-4, a a wrote:
> Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Right. This one is blazing in British Columbia. Canada is turning into an ash pit.
> Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Right. This one is blazing in British Columbia. Canada is turning into an ash pit.
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
Longterm average, burn rate can\'t exceed growth rate.
wrote:
>Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
Longterm average, burn rate can\'t exceed growth rate.
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 9:38:09â¯AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
The areas that are burning may. There\'s a lot of Canada and most of it isn\'t burning.
By the same token, John Larkin will eventually post something worth saying. In reality, ground cover grows a lot faster than trees and burns more easily.
Tree eventually grow up through the ground cover and spread their own leaves above the ground cover, hogging the light and slowing down the growth of the ground. cover no end.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
The areas that are burning may. There\'s a lot of Canada and most of it isn\'t burning.
Longterm average, burn rate can\'t exceed growth rate.
By the same token, John Larkin will eventually post something worth saying. In reality, ground cover grows a lot faster than trees and burns more easily.
Tree eventually grow up through the ground cover and spread their own leaves above the ground cover, hogging the light and slowing down the growth of the ground. cover no end.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09â¯PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
Since this seems to be a global climate effect, we ALL will run out of trees?
Stock up on toothpicks!
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
Since this seems to be a global climate effect, we ALL will run out of trees?
Stock up on toothpicks!
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
Biomass accumulates, and slurps CO2 out of the atmosphere. Since we
haven\'t yet run out of CO2, most of it is being short-term recycled,
by decay in some places and by fire in others.
Some carbon gets long-term sequestered, as peat and coal and oil and
gas, which would kill off all life on earth if nothing returns it to
the atmosphere. Plants would all die below about 150 PPM CO2.
Trees grow and trees burn. That\'s the natural cycle and shouldn\'t
surprise anyone. Modern fire suppression has just changed the burn
duty cycle from lots of small fires to infrequent giant firestorms.
It\'s a CO2 servo. Humans digging up and burning organics just shifts
the equilibrium point to a greener place.
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
Since this seems to be a global climate effect, we ALL will run out of trees?
Stock up on toothpicks!
Biomass accumulates, and slurps CO2 out of the atmosphere. Since we
haven\'t yet run out of CO2, most of it is being short-term recycled,
by decay in some places and by fire in others.
Some carbon gets long-term sequestered, as peat and coal and oil and
gas, which would kill off all life on earth if nothing returns it to
the atmosphere. Plants would all die below about 150 PPM CO2.
Trees grow and trees burn. That\'s the natural cycle and shouldn\'t
surprise anyone. Modern fire suppression has just changed the burn
duty cycle from lots of small fires to infrequent giant firestorms.
It\'s a CO2 servo. Humans digging up and burning organics just shifts
the equilibrium point to a greener place.
A
a a
Guest
On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 17:07:09 UTC+2, John Larkin wrote:
stop your fake
Watere vapor H2O is the only greenhouse gas which matters
Carbon CO2 is an old political fake and agenda to make easy money, selling blah blah blah science to the masses
Read R&D papers by Water Cycle 2021 Nobelist from Japan
https://www.bing.com/search?q=shukuro+manabe+nobel+prize+water+cycle&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&ghc=1&lq=0&pq=shukuro+manabe+nobel+prize+water+cycle&sc=10-38&sk=
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
Since this seems to be a global climate effect, we ALL will run out of trees?
Stock up on toothpicks!
Biomass accumulates, and slurps CO2 out of the atmosphere. Since we
haven\'t yet run out of CO2, most of it is being short-term recycled,
by decay in some places and by fire in others.
Some carbon gets long-term sequestered, as peat and coal and oil and
gas, which would kill off all life on earth if nothing returns it to
the atmosphere. Plants would all die below about 150 PPM CO2.
Trees grow and trees burn. That\'s the natural cycle and shouldn\'t
surprise anyone. Modern fire suppression has just changed the burn
duty cycle from lots of small fires to infrequent giant firestorms.
It\'s a CO2 servo. Humans digging up and burning organics just shifts
the equilibrium point to a greener place.
stop your fake
Watere vapor H2O is the only greenhouse gas which matters
Carbon CO2 is an old political fake and agenda to make easy money, selling blah blah blah science to the masses
Read R&D papers by Water Cycle 2021 Nobelist from Japan
https://www.bing.com/search?q=shukuro+manabe+nobel+prize+water+cycle&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&ghc=1&lq=0&pq=shukuro+manabe+nobel+prize+water+cycle&sc=10-38&sk=
A
a a
Guest
>
Yet one more #veryStupidByLowIQaa post.
Yet one more #veryStupidByLowIQaa post.
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:07:09â¯AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
Since this seems to be a global climate effect, we ALL will run out of trees?
Stock up on toothpicks!
Biomass accumulates, and slurps CO2 out of the atmosphere. Since we
haven\'t yet run out of CO2, most of it is being short-term recycled,
by decay in some places and by fire in others.
Some carbon gets long-term sequestered, as peat and coal and oil and
gas, which would kill off all life on earth if nothing returns it to
the atmosphere. Plants would all die below about 150 PPM CO2.
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Whatever it is, get used to it.
Meter-diameter diamonds? Where can I see one of those?
wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:07:09?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Canadian wildfire smoke continues to plague the United States, triggering air quality alerts for at least 11 states across the northern Plains, Midwest, and Great Lakes region Sunday. #cgtnamerica
Eventually they will run out of trees.
Since this seems to be a global climate effect, we ALL will run out of trees?
Stock up on toothpicks!
Biomass accumulates, and slurps CO2 out of the atmosphere. Since we
haven\'t yet run out of CO2, most of it is being short-term recycled,
by decay in some places and by fire in others.
Some carbon gets long-term sequestered, as peat and coal and oil and
gas, which would kill off all life on earth if nothing returns it to
the atmosphere. Plants would all die below about 150 PPM CO2.
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Whatever it is, get used to it.
Meter-diameter diamonds? Where can I see one of those?
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:02:12â¯PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
The \'humans donation\' is unnatural and has never hit an equilibrium level,
which is the problem now (and a bigger problem in the future).
The small vulcanism output DEFINES the nearly steady-state of
the atmosphere before pollution. Steady-state is good if you want
civilization to persist alongside the background climate.
> It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Not so; too much is pollution. 400 ppm is too much.
Fertilizer runoff is pollution too.
> Meter-diameter diamonds? Where can I see one of those?
At almost earth-core pressures and temperatures, a couple of thousand
miles down.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
The \'humans donation\' is unnatural and has never hit an equilibrium level,
which is the problem now (and a bigger problem in the future).
The small vulcanism output DEFINES the nearly steady-state of
the atmosphere before pollution. Steady-state is good if you want
civilization to persist alongside the background climate.
> It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Not so; too much is pollution. 400 ppm is too much.
Fertilizer runoff is pollution too.
> Meter-diameter diamonds? Where can I see one of those?
At almost earth-core pressures and temperatures, a couple of thousand
miles down.
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:15:02 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
I\'ll try Amazon.
wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 6:02:12?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
The \'humans donation\' is unnatural and has never hit an equilibrium level,
which is the problem now (and a bigger problem in the future).
The small vulcanism output DEFINES the nearly steady-state of
the atmosphere before pollution. Steady-state is good if you want
civilization to persist alongside the background climate.
It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Not so; too much is pollution. 400 ppm is too much.
Fertilizer runoff is pollution too.
Meter-diameter diamonds? Where can I see one of those?
At almost earth-core pressures and temperatures, a couple of thousand
miles down.
I\'ll try Amazon.
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:02:12â¯AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
It\'s not even your fantasy, but harvested from the climate change denial propaganda you cut and paste here.
Plants don\'t need more CO2. If it is offered to them they shrink their stomata so that they can get what they do need while losing less water.
> Whatever it is, get used to it.
Not good advice. The fossil carbon extraction industry would like to keep on making even more money out of keeping on wrecking the climate, but we need to take their greedy little hands out of the honey-pot.
> Meter-diameter diamonds? Where can I see one of those?
Dive down any hole which will take you below the Mohorovic discontinuity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohorovi%C4%8Di%C4%87_discontinuity
You won\'t come up again soon - you\'d need to ride a subduction zone down to get that deep.
--
Bil Sloman, Sydney
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:07:09?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
It\'s not even your fantasy, but harvested from the climate change denial propaganda you cut and paste here.
Plants don\'t need more CO2. If it is offered to them they shrink their stomata so that they can get what they do need while losing less water.
> Whatever it is, get used to it.
Not good advice. The fossil carbon extraction industry would like to keep on making even more money out of keeping on wrecking the climate, but we need to take their greedy little hands out of the honey-pot.
> Meter-diameter diamonds? Where can I see one of those?
Dive down any hole which will take you below the Mohorovic discontinuity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohorovi%C4%8Di%C4%87_discontinuity
You won\'t come up again soon - you\'d need to ride a subduction zone down to get that deep.
--
Bil Sloman, Sydney
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 10:53:19â¯PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
This is, arguably, the DUMBEST thing that Bozo has EVER said. OF COURSE plants need CO2 - nobody with a nanogram of intelligence questions that. This, naturally, leaves Bozo as the SOLE proponent of negative gravity.
> Bil Sloman, Sydney
BTW, Bozo is SO STUPID that he can\'t even spell his OWN NAME!
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:02:12â¯AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:07:09?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
It\'s not even your fantasy, but harvested from the climate change denial propaganda you cut and paste here.
Plants don\'t need more CO2.
This is, arguably, the DUMBEST thing that Bozo has EVER said. OF COURSE plants need CO2 - nobody with a nanogram of intelligence questions that. This, naturally, leaves Bozo as the SOLE proponent of negative gravity.
> Bil Sloman, Sydney
BTW, Bozo is SO STUPID that he can\'t even spell his OWN NAME!
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 22:50:46 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
<soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:
I wish someone would explain to him the difference between
its and it\'s.
<soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 10:53:19?PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:02:12?AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:07:09?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
It\'s not even your fantasy, but harvested from the climate change denial propaganda you cut and paste here.
Plants don\'t need more CO2.
This is, arguably, the DUMBEST thing that Bozo has EVER said. OF COURSE plants need CO2 - nobody with a nanogram of intelligence questions that. This, naturally, leaves Bozo as the SOLE proponent of negative gravity.
Bil Sloman, Sydney
BTW, Bozo is SO STUPID that he can\'t even spell his OWN NAME!
I wish someone would explain to him the difference between
its and it\'s.
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 9:27:20â¯PM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
<snipped the rest of Flyguy\'s drivel>
John Larkin clearly doesn\'t know. \"It\'s\" is a contraction of \"it is\" and \"its\" is the possessive form of \"it\" meaning that something belongs to \"it\".
Every other place you use that possessive form you put an in apostrophe - \"their\'s\" - but it isn\'t used in \"its\" to avoid ambiguity.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/its-vs-its/
And I used the correct form in both places I used it in my post, so it is John Larkin who needs the explanation. which I have now given him.
James Arthur once chivied me about me getting it wrong - I\'d made a typo - and John seems to think that he can add it to his collection of standard insults.
He needs better English language skills before that can work.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 22:50:46 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 10:53:19?PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, July 18, 2023 at 11:02:12?AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, July 17, 2023 at 8:07:09?AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:06:44 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sunday, July 16, 2023 at 4:38:09?PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 15:12:46 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
Vulcanism \'returns\' CO2 to the atmosphere, not from surface coal deposits,
but from all the other things down in the magma (like, meter-diameter
diamonds). Weathering of rocks removes CO2, the thin crust of life is
not a big player. Weathering of rocks doesn\'t keep up with human coal/oil
extraction and combustion, thus atmospheric pollution proceeds.
Vulcanism delivers very little CO2, estimated 1/60 of what humans
donate.
It\'s not pollution, it\'s fertilization.
Not so. That\'s the same old fantasy you\'ve voiced before.
It\'s not even your fantasy, but harvested from the climate change denial propaganda you cut and paste here.
Plants don\'t need more CO2. If it is offered to them they shrink their stomata so that they can get what they do need while losing less water.
<snipped the rest of Flyguy\'s drivel>
I wish someone would explain to him the difference between
its and it\'s.
John Larkin clearly doesn\'t know. \"It\'s\" is a contraction of \"it is\" and \"its\" is the possessive form of \"it\" meaning that something belongs to \"it\".
Every other place you use that possessive form you put an in apostrophe - \"their\'s\" - but it isn\'t used in \"its\" to avoid ambiguity.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/its-vs-its/
And I used the correct form in both places I used it in my post, so it is John Larkin who needs the explanation. which I have now given him.
James Arthur once chivied me about me getting it wrong - I\'d made a typo - and John seems to think that he can add it to his collection of standard insults.
He needs better English language skills before that can work.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney