Z
z
Guest
oh yeah!
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im sitting here with a group of guys (and one in CA, and one in england"z" <gzuckier@snail-mail.net> wrote in message
news:58bab90b-0136-4b71-a810-ce5780d96b13@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
oh yeah!
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
I got a laugh out of that.
Thanks.
Tom
How's Skype for you in that respect? Can you share drawings and docs?Tom Biasi wrote:
"z" <gzuckier@snail-mail.net> wrote in message
news:58bab90b-0136-4b71-a810-ce5780d96b13@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
oh yeah!
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
I got a laugh out of that.
Thanks.
Tom
Im sitting here with a group of guys (and one in CA, and one in england
thanks skype) working on an LED video screen. we got a laugh out of it
too![]()
Eavesdrop is easy in Skype. The company sells the backdoor:How's Skype for you in that respect? Can you share drawings and docs?
How about eaves-drop safety?
Ok, I wouldn't worry too much about law enforcement dropping in since IJoerg wrote:
How's Skype for you in that respect? Can you share drawings and docs?
How about eaves-drop safety?
Eavesdrop is easy in Skype. The company sells the backdoor:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Spekulationen-um-Backdoor-in-Skype--/meldung/113281
On Aug 21, 7:28 am, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote:
oh yeah!http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
Brilliant!
Cue the Phil Allison jokes... :-
Dave.
Brilliant!oh yeah!http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
newsoOdnTR5gdf1-C_VnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@earthlink.com...
"David L. Jones" wrote:
On Aug 21, 7:28 am, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote:
oh
yeah!http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
Brilliant!
Cue the Phil Allison jokes... :-
Dave.
"Phil Allison jokes"? Isn't that an oxymoron?
No petal, your the cross posting Oxymoran, Still I expect Phil, will get
to you in his own time.
from a speed hump.
How did they made the wires and connection points for the parts? Looks likeoh yeah!
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
Did you they did not show the LED wiring.z wrote:
oh yeah!
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/08/bread_circuit_board_blink.html
How did they made the wires and connection points for the parts? Looks like
toasted bread.
Not that I really have anybody I need to call, but this Skype looks prettyFrank Buss wrote:
Joerg wrote:
How's Skype for you in that respect? Can you share drawings and docs?
How about eaves-drop safety?
Eavesdrop is easy in Skype. The company sells the backdoor:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Spekulationen-um-Backdoor-in-Skype--/meldung/113281
Ok, I wouldn't worry too much about law enforcement dropping in since I
don't do any illegal stuff. But the rumors about selling are concerning.
Might be just rumors though. I am more concerned about schematics and
stuff that get shared during discussions. Not sure whether and how that
works though because there is only scant information on the Skype site,
and it only lists webcam style video.
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:39:18 -0700, Joerg wrote:
Frank Buss wrote:
Joerg wrote:
How's Skype for you in that respect? Can you share drawings and docs?
How about eaves-drop safety?
Eavesdrop is easy in Skype. The company sells the backdoor:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Spekulationen-um-Backdoor-in-Skype--/meldung/113281
Ok, I wouldn't worry too much about law enforcement dropping in since I
don't do any illegal stuff. But the rumors about selling are concerning.
Might be just rumors though. I am more concerned about schematics and
stuff that get shared during discussions. Not sure whether and how that
works though because there is only scant information on the Skype site,
and it only lists webcam style video.
Not that I really have anybody I need to call, but this Skype looks pretty
interesting. So I went to their site, and they don't have a Slackware
package and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
Actually, I had first heard of Linux in the 1995 era, so I decided to tryRich Grise wrote:
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Actually, it's the oldest extant distro.Rich Grise wrote:
[...]Skype looks pretty interesting
[...]they don't have a Slackware package
and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
Joerg wrote:
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Rich Grise wrote:
[...]Skype looks pretty interesting
[...]they don't have a Slackware package
and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
Joerg wrote:
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Actually, it's the oldest extant distro.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:t01sMEAV2jYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions+1993-08+1994-*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux
I've wondered what the world would be like
if a big rock had fallen out of the sky and
impacted the Redmond campus during business hours ~April 1, 1995
(before W95 and just before Red Hat's release).
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:14:00 -0700, Joerg wrote:
Rich Grise wrote:
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Actually, I had first heard of Linux in the 1995 era, so I decided to try
it. I was wondering which distro to d/l, and there were so many options,
with attributes and stuff that I had no clue about, so I picked Slackware
because I liked the name. Linux for slackers - what a perfect fit! ;-P
Mind you, it's not Aunt Tillie-Friendly at all - it's more of a techie's
Linux.![]()
OS/2 2.0 came out in April, 1992. A spectacular technicalJeffM wrote:
Rich Grise wrote:
[...]Skype looks pretty interesting
[...]they don't have a Slackware package
and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
Joerg wrote:
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Actually, it's the oldest extant distro.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:t01sMEAV2jYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions+1993-08+1994-*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux
I've wondered what the world would be like
if a big rock had fallen out of the sky and
impacted the Redmond campus during business hours ~April 1, 1995
(before W95 and just before Red Hat's release).
Probably IBM would then still be in that biz because there wouldn't have
been Senor Gates eating their lunch.
Well, absolutely. I was sure hoping OS/2 would make it but theyJoerg wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Rich Grise wrote:
[...]Skype looks pretty interesting
[...]they don't have a Slackware package
and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
Joerg wrote:
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Actually, it's the oldest extant distro.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:t01sMEAV2jYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions+1993-08+1994-*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux
I've wondered what the world would be like
if a big rock had fallen out of the sky and
impacted the Redmond campus during business hours ~April 1, 1995
(before W95 and just before Red Hat's release).
Probably IBM would then still be in that biz because there wouldn't
have been Senor Gates eating their lunch.
OS/2 2.0 came out in April, 1992. A spectacular technical
success--multithreaded 32-bit OS, fully object-oriented GUI, a beautiful
object model (SOM)...I could go on...but a stupid marketing failure. I
still use OS/2 at least a few times a week, and I still love it.
Phil Hobbs wrote:
Joerg wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Rich Grise wrote:
[...]Skype looks pretty interesting
[...]they don't have a Slackware package
and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
Joerg wrote:
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Actually, it's the oldest extant distro.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:t01sMEAV2jYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions+1993-08+1994-*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux
I've wondered what the world would be like
if a big rock had fallen out of the sky and
impacted the Redmond campus during business hours ~April 1, 1995
(before W95 and just before Red Hat's release).
Probably IBM would then still be in that biz because there wouldn't
have been Senor Gates eating their lunch.
OS/2 2.0 came out in April, 1992. A spectacular technical
success--multithreaded 32-bit OS, fully object-oriented GUI, a beautiful
object model (SOM)...I could go on...but a stupid marketing failure. I
still use OS/2 at least a few times a week, and I still love it.
Well, absolutely. I was sure hoping OS/2 would make it but they
blundered so badly in the marketing area that it's hard to believe.
Essentially they could have eaten Microsoft's lunch but instead simply
walked away from the table.
They simply didn't have the money.
Back then the money ratio was still in IBM's favor. IBM turned awayIn article <pZytk.23024$N87.21011@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com>,
notthisjoergsch@removethispacbell.net says...
Phil Hobbs wrote:
Joerg wrote:
JeffM wrote:
Rich Grise wrote:
[...]Skype looks pretty interesting
[...]they don't have a Slackware package
and I didn't see any links to source where I can compile it here.
Anybody heard of either of those anywhere?
Joerg wrote:
What's slackware? Some kind of trousers?
duck and run ...
Actually, it's the oldest extant distro.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:t01sMEAV2jYJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions+1993-08+1994-*-*+1993-07+text+text+1995.*.*+without.cost+text+First.Public.Release+text+Debian.Project+SuSE.Linux+Slackware+text+text+Red.Hat.Linux
I've wondered what the world would be like
if a big rock had fallen out of the sky and
impacted the Redmond campus during business hours ~April 1, 1995
(before W95 and just before Red Hat's release).
Probably IBM would then still be in that biz because there wouldn't
have been Senor Gates eating their lunch.
OS/2 2.0 came out in April, 1992. A spectacular technical
success--multithreaded 32-bit OS, fully object-oriented GUI, a beautiful
object model (SOM)...I could go on...but a stupid marketing failure. I
still use OS/2 at least a few times a week, and I still love it.
Well, absolutely. I was sure hoping OS/2 would make it but they
blundered so badly in the marketing area that it's hard to believe.
Essentially they could have eaten Microsoft's lunch but instead simply
walked away from the table.
They simply didn't have the money.