Branch prediction with counters for sale too !

S

Skybuck Flying

Guest
Since it's highly like that I am the true and only inventors of branch
prediction with counters... this might be patent worthy material...

So I shall give you the OPTION of BUYING an OPTION on this technically to
finance it.

You shall pay me 30000 U$ dollars to finance the patent application filing.

Then on successfull patent filement you shall receive a contract stating
that you have the right to turn your option into transfer of patents rights
etc.... for just a merely 10 million dollars... just processors are big
bussinessss.

Thus you can crush your opponent by excluding him from this great skybuck
concept and technology.

The option will last for 100 years.

Sign up now and be damned forever :D

hjehehhehehe

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
"Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...
Since it's highly like that I am the true and only inventors of branch
prediction with counters... this might be patent worthy material...

So I shall give you the OPTION of BUYING an OPTION on this technically to
finance it.

You shall pay me 30000 U$ dollars to finance the patent application
filing.

Then on successfull patent filement you shall receive a contract stating
that you have the right to turn your option into transfer of patents
rights
etc.... for just a merely 10 million dollars... just processors are big
bussinessss.

Thus you can crush your opponent by excluding him from this great skybuck
concept and technology.

The option will last for 100 years.

Sign up now and be damned forever :D
Lol fucking funny.

Sign up now or be damned forever ! lol

hjehehhehehe

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
"Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd8an6$a2d$1@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
Since it's highly like that I am the true and only inventors of branch
prediction with counters... this might be patent worthy material...

Well past <plonk> time for this guy.

Ken
 
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:12:35 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
<nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

Since it's highly like that I am the true and only inventors of branch
prediction with counters... this might be patent worthy material...

So I shall give you the OPTION of BUYING an OPTION on this technically to
finance it.

You shall pay me 30000 U$ dollars to finance the patent application filing.

Then on successfull patent filement you shall receive a contract stating
that you have the right to turn your option into transfer of patents rights
etc.... for just a merely 10 million dollars... just processors are big
bussinessss.

Thus you can crush your opponent by excluding him from this great skybuck
concept and technology.

The option will last for 100 years.

Sign up now and be damned forever :D

hjehehhehehe

Bye,
Skybuck.
Two small problems:

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

2. The idea is worthless.

Why don't you sign up for a community-college course, or read some
good books, and learn something about electronics? Your speculations
just show how out of touch you are.


John
 
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:35:02 -0700, in sci.electronics.design John
Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:12:35 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

snip stuff

Two small problems:

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

2. The idea is worthless.

Why don't you sign up for a community-college course, or read some
good books, and learn something about electronics? Your speculations
just show how out of touch you are.


John
have you done a google on this guy and seen how many news group he
inhabits?

reminds me of
Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson, all about a high speed pizza delivery
lad


martin
 
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:35:02 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:12:35 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

Since it's highly like that I am the true and only inventors of branch
prediction with counters... this might be patent worthy material...

So I shall give you the OPTION of BUYING an OPTION on this technically to
finance it.

You shall pay me 30000 U$ dollars to finance the patent application filing.

Then on successfull patent filement you shall receive a contract stating
that you have the right to turn your option into transfer of patents rights
etc.... for just a merely 10 million dollars... just processors are big
bussinessss.

Thus you can crush your opponent by excluding him from this great skybuck
concept and technology.

The option will last for 100 years.

Sign up now and be damned forever :D

hjehehhehehe

Bye,
Skybuck.


Two small problems:

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

2. The idea is worthless.

Why don't you sign up for a community-college course, or read some
good books, and learn something about electronics? Your speculations
just show how out of touch you are.


John
Heh, the last thing he wants is to learn. He is just a troll. ;-)

--Mac
 
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:ubgff19htbao286jqi5p2h0tv5saak3i85@4ax.com...
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:12:35 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

Since it's highly like that I am the true and only inventors of branch
prediction with counters... this might be patent worthy material...

So I shall give you the OPTION of BUYING an OPTION on this technically to
finance it.

You shall pay me 30000 U$ dollars to finance the patent application
filing.

Then on successfull patent filement you shall receive a contract stating
that you have the right to turn your option into transfer of patents
rights
etc.... for just a merely 10 million dollars... just processors are big
bussinessss.

Thus you can crush your opponent by excluding him from this great skybuck
concept and technology.

The option will last for 100 years.

Sign up now and be damned forever :D

hjehehhehehe

Bye,
Skybuck.


Two small problems:

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and
This proves you a dumb fuck so, beat it.

2. The idea is worthless.
Says a dumb fuck, just beat it

Why don't you sign up for a community-college course, or read some
good books, and learn something about electronics? Your speculations
just show how out of touch you are.


John
 
"Mac" <foo@bar.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.08.09.03.00.30.414776@bar.net...
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:35:02 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:12:35 +0200, "Skybuck Flying"
nospam@hotmail.com> wrote:

Since it's highly like that I am the true and only inventors of branch
prediction with counters... this might be patent worthy material...

So I shall give you the OPTION of BUYING an OPTION on this technically
to
finance it.

You shall pay me 30000 U$ dollars to finance the patent application
filing.

Then on successfull patent filement you shall receive a contract stating
that you have the right to turn your option into transfer of patents
rights
etc.... for just a merely 10 million dollars... just processors are big
bussinessss.

Thus you can crush your opponent by excluding him from this great
skybuck
concept and technology.

The option will last for 100 years.

Sign up now and be damned forever :D

hjehehhehehe

Bye,
Skybuck.


Two small problems:

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

2. The idea is worthless.

Why don't you sign up for a community-college course, or read some
good books, and learn something about electronics? Your speculations
just show how out of touch you are.


John

Heh, the last thing he wants is to learn. He is just a troll. ;-)

--Mac
Maaaaaccccccc I seeeeee yoouu :)
 
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:25:16 +0200, martin griffith
<martingriffith@XXyahoo.co.uk> wrote:

have you done a google on this guy and seen how many news group he
inhabits?
And the statements he makes, and questions he asks. Geez, Louise.

At least news2020 never ventured out of SED, AFAIK.

reminds me of
Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson, all about a high speed pizza delivery
lad


martin
-----
http://www.mindspring.com/~benbradley
 
"Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd9gd3$vrb$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

This proves you a dumb fuck so, beat it.


2. The idea is worthless.

Says a dumb fuck, just beat it
Bad language and grammar errors sort of interfers with the purpose of
calling anyone "dumb" does it not?

Shouldn't you rather be back in school by now, looser?
 
"Ben Bradley" <ben_nospam_bradley@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:bniif1tiom0335gmhp2vbfme3n6pvdp7bp@4ax.com...
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:25:16 +0200, martin griffith
martingriffith@XXyahoo.co.uk> wrote:

have you done a google on this guy and seen how many news group he
inhabits?

And the statements he makes, and questions he asks. Geez, Louise.

At least news2020 never ventured out of SED, AFAIK.
Whatever *happened* to news2020? The microwave ate his balls while asleep??

At least he/she/it was kind of entertaining in a conspiracy-nutty and
paranoid way.
 
Bad language and grammar errors sort of interfers with the purpose of
calling anyone "dumb" does it not?

Shouldn't you rather be back in school by now, looser?
"looser?"

When flaming about grammar and spelling, it's a good idea to make sure
your post is correct :)

Al
 
"Al Borowski" <al.borowski@EraseThis.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:42fa01b9$0$32264$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
Bad language and grammar errors sort of interfers with the purpose of
calling anyone "dumb" does it not?

Shouldn't you rather be back in school by now, looser?

"looser?"

When flaming about grammar and spelling, it's a good idea to make sure
your post is correct :)

Al
Probably - but that would be pedantic <lol>
 
In article <42fa01b9$0$32264$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-
01.iinet.net.au>, al.borowski@EraseThis.gmail.com says...
Bad language and grammar errors sort of interfers with the purpose of
calling anyone "dumb" does it not?

Shouldn't you rather be back in school by now, looser?

"looser?"

When flaming about grammar and spelling, it's a good idea to make sure
your post is correct :)
Actually, I thought Sky was pretty "loose" lately.

--
Keith
 
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:56:14 +0200, Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:
"Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd9gd3$vrb$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

This proves you a dumb fuck so, beat it.

2. The idea is worthless.

Says a dumb fuck, just beat it

Bad language and grammar errors sort of interfers with the purpose of
calling anyone "dumb" does it not?

Shouldn't you rather be back in school by now, looser?
I think he should be back in school, but tighter. ;-P
--
Cheers!
Rich
 
Rich The Newsgroup Wacko wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:56:14 +0200, Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:

"Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd9gd3$vrb$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

This proves you a dumb fuck so, beat it.


2. The idea is worthless.

Says a dumb fuck, just beat it

Bad language and grammar errors sort of interfers with the purpose of
calling anyone "dumb" does it not?

Shouldn't you rather be back in school by now, looser?


I think he should be back in school, but tighter. ;-P
I presume you refer to the nice white jacket :)

Cheers
Terry
 
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:36:17 +1200, Terry Given wrote:

Rich The Newsgroup Wacko wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:56:14 +0200, Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:

"Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dd9gd3$vrb$1@news5.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...

1. You have already publically disclosed the idea, and

This proves you a dumb fuck so, beat it.


2. The idea is worthless.

Says a dumb fuck, just beat it

Bad language and grammar errors sort of interfers with the purpose of
calling anyone "dumb" does it not?

Shouldn't you rather be back in school by now, looser?


I think he should be back in school, but tighter. ;-P

I presume you refer to the nice white jacket :)

Well, there is an expression, "Not too tightly wrapped". I think
it's somehow related to loose cards in the attic deck or something...

Why didn't they play cards on The Ark?

Because Noah was sitting on the deck. %-}

(I almost said, 'Moses'. heh. "How many animals did Moses take on the
Ark?" None, silly!)

Cheers!
Rich
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top