M
Matt
Guest
could this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
cheers
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
cheers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IMO.could this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
To add to this, the couple of technical articles linked have nothingMatt <ratatak@gmail.com> wrote:
could this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
IMO.
No, it's a scam intended to get a few hundred orders, and then the
originator to leave with the money.
Even if the chips need no energy, the transmitter/camera/screen
still do.
Well, the 'crystalline' material image looked suspiciously like salt orMatt <ratatak@gmail.com> wrote:
could this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
could this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
cheers
No. To communicate you have to transmit energy. To see a screen youcould this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
cheers
Seeing as your name is 'Matt' and the domain is registered to: 'Mattcould this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
cheers
The phrase, "latest spin-off from the space program" is also always a goodNotice also that the stated processor specs are wildly in excess of
whats needed to run a mobile phone, and the picture looks like its
been patched together on a pc, rather than a real item photographed.
On 7 Nov 2004 08:20:54 -0800, ratatak@gmail.com (Matt) wrote:
could this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
Seeing as your name is 'Matt' and the domain is registered to: 'Matt
Cartwright' (of Siren Publishing in Wolverhampton) I'd say it's fake
and you're trying to pull a fast one, matey!
PT Barnum made a serious error when he said "there's a sucker born everysPoNiX@yahoo.com (sPoNiX) wrote in message news:<418f97eb.26733687@news.individual.net>...
On 7 Nov 2004 08:20:54 -0800, ratatak@gmail.com (Matt) wrote:
could this be real?
http://www.zeroenergyphone.com
Seeing as your name is 'Matt' and the domain is registered to: 'Matt
Cartwright' (of Siren Publishing in Wolverhampton) I'd say it's fake
and you're trying to pull a fast one, matey!
The odds of that are 1 over the total number of Matts. It would be
remarkably dumb posting that ad on an electronic engineering forum....
but that hasnt always stopped them.
NT
Well, an almost identical post has appeared in uk.telecom.mobile fromThe odds of that are 1 over the total number of Matts. It would be
remarkably dumb posting that ad on an electronic engineering forum....
but that hasnt always stopped them.
Well, I understand that avariciously stupid people deserve a good lesson,N. Thornton wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me the people who fall for the stupid Nigerian
scam (and its variants). In the last couple of years in NZ, half a dozen
or so groups have fallen "victim" to this fraud. Surprisingly (or
perhaps unsurprisingly) the people losing millions of dollars (ha!
dickheads) have been lawyers, bankers and economists - including the
(former) chief economist of the ASB bank, who lost several million
dollars of his and his friends money. ROTFLMAO
It originated much sooner, in the early 1980. Google on the subject.Yes, the old Nigerian 419 fee in advance scam. Started in the early
90's. Now it has "evolved" into a different format. It is no longer
some top official with the Nigerian Oil Ministry looking to hide 33
million dollars in a foreign bank. Now it comes in the form of an RFQ
asking for pricing of all your products. The new lure is placing a
huge order and then somewhere in the transaction they will need an
advanced payment usually $10,000.00.
In 1993 my R&D manager got one of these letters, from nigeria. The"Product developer" <jdurban@vorel.com> wrote in message
news:118afaeb.0411090725.127c01fb@posting.google.com...
Yes, the old Nigerian 419 fee in advance scam. Started in the early
90's. Now it has "evolved" into a different format. It is no longer
some top official with the Nigerian Oil Ministry looking to hide 33
million dollars in a foreign bank. Now it comes in the form of an RFQ
asking for pricing of all your products. The new lure is placing a
huge order and then somewhere in the transaction they will need an
advanced payment usually $10,000.00.
It originated much sooner, in the early 1980. Google on the subject.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1020614,00.asp
This particular con actually did begin in Nigeria and predates the Web. In the
original scam, paper letters were sent out by hand, including elaborate packages
of documents. Care went into finding the right suckers. With spam broadcast
mailing, such research is no longer necessary. I predict quality con jobs are
going to be a thing of the past, and Darwinism will take over. The dumbest get
ripped off.
SioL
I got one way back. Printed with a manual typewriter on somethingSioL wrote:
"Product developer" <jdurban@vorel.com> wrote in message
news:118afaeb.0411090725.127c01fb@posting.google.com...
Yes, the old Nigerian 419 fee in advance scam. Started in the early
90's. Now it has "evolved" into a different format. It is no longer
some top official with the Nigerian Oil Ministry looking to hide 33
million dollars in a foreign bank. Now it comes in the form of an RFQ
asking for pricing of all your products. The new lure is placing a
huge order and then somewhere in the transaction they will need an
advanced payment usually $10,000.00.
It originated much sooner, in the early 1980. Google on the subject.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1020614,00.asp
This particular con actually did begin in Nigeria and predates the Web. In the
original scam, paper letters were sent out by hand, including elaborate packages
of documents. Care went into finding the right suckers. With spam broadcast
mailing, such research is no longer necessary. I predict quality con jobs are
going to be a thing of the past, and Darwinism will take over. The dumbest get
ripped off.
SioL
In 1993 my R&D manager got one of these letters, from nigeria. The
letter got framed, and put on the wall
Cheers
Terry
You dirty rotten scoundrel!I milked it until they stopped calling. Nothing more fun than scamming
a scammer.
Usually governments are the people who create disasters in the first place.Aid should *never* be given to governments.
A lot of so-called "aid" is advanced weaponry. They certainly wouldn'tKryten wrote:
N. Thornton wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me the people who fall for the stupid Nigerian
scam (and its variants). In the last couple of years in NZ, half a dozen
or so groups have fallen "victim" to this fraud. Surprisingly (or
perhaps unsurprisingly) the people losing millions of dollars (ha!
dickheads) have been lawyers, bankers and economists - including the
(former) chief economist of the ASB bank, who lost several million
dollars of his and his friends money. ROTFLMAO
Well, I understand that avariciously stupid people deserve a good lesson,
but if they go to jail we have to pay to keep them there.
If they commit suicide they leave behind upset families.
Most of all I hate the fact that a bunch of thieving vermin are making
millions while I'm trying to earn an honest crust.
They're probably laughing loudest at you and I.
I think the west should deduct the amount scammed from the amount we give
them in aid.
Only then are their governments going to make a crackdown,
when it comes out of their pockets.
Aid should *never* be given to governments.
Nah. Money itself is neutral. It's what us peons use to buy stuff"Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote in message
news:2vcpfeF2k1eaoU2@uni-berlin.de...
Aid should *never* be given to governments.
Usually governments are the people who create disasters in the first place.
And pocket aid before it gets to the victims.
Western governments don't seem to care who it gets to.
Just as long as they are seen to be giving out aid money (from our pockets),
they take the public credit (and the private arms contracts).
When money talks - it swears.
On 8 Nov 2004 14:56:40 -0800, bigcat@meeow.co.uk (N. Thornton) wrote:
The odds of that are 1 over the total number of Matts. It would be
remarkably dumb posting that ad on an electronic engineering forum....
but that hasnt always stopped them.
Well, an almost identical post has appeared in uk.telecom.mobile from
someone called "Matt" and using the email address "Matt@koded.co.uk"..
Do a whois on "koded.co.uk" and you'll see it's registered at the same
address as "zeroenergyphone.com."
Go to www.koded.co.uk and click "view source"....
The result? "Author...Matt Cartwright"
sPoNiX