Are Gowin Serious Contenders?...

R

Rick C

Guest
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 29/08/2020 08:01, Rick C wrote:
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.
I know the tech rep for Gowin in the UK so I knew who to talk to, but it
was quite encouraging.
I have a little dev board to play with and I\'ve installed the tools.
The general impression I get is that it\'s like some of the Lattice folk
moved and set up Lattice Mk 2.
For you and me, as long term Lattice users, it feels very comfortable.
I\'ve been quoted a *lot* less than Mouser for the 8k LUT part with on
chip 8Mbyte SDRAM (1k.
I haven\'t bought any yet - so I have no info re. delivery performance etc.
The 88 pin QFN package with SDRAM inside is pretty cool, tiny (10mm
square) but about 60 truly available pins and none used up by memory.
0.4mm pitch but I\'ve done that on QFN before (in prototypes) with no
problems.

Apparently the 2 and 4k LUT parts with on board 60MHz Cortex M3 are dead
cheap too.

I mean to play with it over the weekend - I\'ll let you know how it goes.

The 8k part has 10 DSP modules, which at a casual glance are the same as
Lattices in the XP2.

MK
 
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 4:50:28 AM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 08:01, Rick C wrote:
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.

I know the tech rep for Gowin in the UK so I knew who to talk to, but it
was quite encouraging.
I have a little dev board to play with and I\'ve installed the tools.
The general impression I get is that it\'s like some of the Lattice folk
moved and set up Lattice Mk 2.
For you and me, as long term Lattice users, it feels very comfortable.

I\'ve heard that a lot. I use a Lattice XP device in a current design. I wonder if my Chinese Lattice programming cable will work with the Gowin devices?


I\'ve been quoted a *lot* less than Mouser for the 8k LUT part with on
chip 8Mbyte SDRAM (1k.
I haven\'t bought any yet - so I have no info re. delivery performance etc..
The 88 pin QFN package with SDRAM inside is pretty cool, tiny (10mm
square) but about 60 truly available pins and none used up by memory.
0.4mm pitch but I\'ve done that on QFN before (in prototypes) with no
problems.

The 100 QFP I\'m using is 0.5 mm pitch and I have no trouble with it. At 6/6 design rules 0.4 mm pitch is still very practical.


Apparently the 2 and 4k LUT parts with on board 60MHz Cortex M3 are dead
cheap too.

One problem with Gowin is even though I\'ve looked at the parts many, many times, I can\'t tell you which parts those are. I\'m not a fan of their system of numbering and their lack of product selection guides. It\'s probably been almost a year since I\'ve looked at them hard though.

Here is an issue, the web site mentions the GW1N-2, but I can\'t find a data sheet on it. Is that a product???


I mean to play with it over the weekend - I\'ll let you know how it goes.

The 8k part has 10 DSP modules, which at a casual glance are the same as
Lattices in the XP2.

Multiplier/DSP modules are a requirement for this design. I don\'t want to be making multipliers out of fabric.

Mostly I need to see lower pricing and I need to believe they will be around in 10 years, oh, and produce will be available without long waits. I had contact with a local Gowin sales person a while back. I\'ll try writing him.


Which dev board do you have, the Sipeed Tang Nano thing? I\'ve thought about getting that board with a display, but 1 kLUTs is not very big. I guess Sipeed went for low price.


As an aside, maybe you can explain the MK 2 thing. I understand it means \"Mark 2\" which is rev 2. But why? I\'m working with mostly Brits and they keep labeling the docs as rev x.y or Mk x.y randomly. I\'ve even seen them use rev x.y in the file name and MK x.y in the text of the file.

Why mix terms like this? Not sure why it bugs me, but I guess it\'s just that I\'m not familiar with it and it\'s not glazed donuts per bald eagle.

I try to avoid US lingo, but sometimes I don\'t know I\'m using it. Once in the conference call I said something was about as big as a quarter not realizing no one even knew what a \"quarter\" was much less how big it is. Then I tend to use inches which the Brits don\'t know even though they invented them! Brits gave up on that crap a long time ago and we are rather stuck in the rut here in the US. They use an odd metric number and I have to find my calculator to convert, lol.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 29/08/2020 16:42, Rick C wrote:
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 4:50:28 AM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 08:01, Rick C wrote:
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.

I know the tech rep for Gowin in the UK so I knew who to talk to, but it
was quite encouraging.
I have a little dev board to play with and I\'ve installed the tools.
The general impression I get is that it\'s like some of the Lattice folk
moved and set up Lattice Mk 2.
For you and me, as long term Lattice users, it feels very comfortable.

I\'ve heard that a lot. I use a Lattice XP device in a current design. I wonder if my Chinese Lattice programming cable will work with the Gowin devices?


I\'ve been quoted a *lot* less than Mouser for the 8k LUT part with on
chip 8Mbyte SDRAM (1k.
I haven\'t bought any yet - so I have no info re. delivery performance etc.
The 88 pin QFN package with SDRAM inside is pretty cool, tiny (10mm
square) but about 60 truly available pins and none used up by memory.
0.4mm pitch but I\'ve done that on QFN before (in prototypes) with no
problems.

The 100 QFP I\'m using is 0.5 mm pitch and I have no trouble with it. At 6/6 design rules 0.4 mm pitch is still very practical.


Apparently the 2 and 4k LUT parts with on board 60MHz Cortex M3 are dead
cheap too.

One problem with Gowin is even though I\'ve looked at the parts many, many times, I can\'t tell you which parts those are. I\'m not a fan of their system of numbering and their lack of product selection guides. It\'s probably been almost a year since I\'ve looked at them hard though.

Here is an issue, the web site mentions the GW1N-2, but I can\'t find a data sheet on it. Is that a product???


I mean to play with it over the weekend - I\'ll let you know how it goes.

The 8k part has 10 DSP modules, which at a casual glance are the same as
Lattices in the XP2.

Multiplier/DSP modules are a requirement for this design. I don\'t want to be making multipliers out of fabric.

Mostly I need to see lower pricing and I need to believe they will be around in 10 years, oh, and produce will be available without long waits. I had contact with a local Gowin sales person a while back. I\'ll try writing him.


Which dev board do you have, the Sipeed Tang Nano thing? I\'ve thought about getting that board with a display, but 1 kLUTs is not very big. I guess Sipeed went for low price.


As an aside, maybe you can explain the MK 2 thing. I understand it means \"Mark 2\" which is rev 2. But why? I\'m working with mostly Brits and they keep labeling the docs as rev x.y or Mk x.y randomly. I\'ve even seen them use rev x.y in the file name and MK x.y in the text of the file.

Why mix terms like this? Not sure why it bugs me, but I guess it\'s just that I\'m not familiar with it and it\'s not glazed donuts per bald eagle.

I try to avoid US lingo, but sometimes I don\'t know I\'m using it. Once in the conference call I said something was about as big as a quarter not realizing no one even knew what a \"quarter\" was much less how big it is. Then I tend to use inches which the Brits don\'t know even though they invented them! Brits gave up on that crap a long time ago and we are rather stuck in the rut here in the US. They use an odd metric number and I have to find my calculator to convert, lol.

Certainly Gowin\'s part numbering is confusing !

GW1N-1xxxx is a 1k LUT
GW1N-4xxxx is a 2k LUT part

But there are loads of parts in each size with letters replacing my xxx
to denote what features there are out of RAM, SDRAM, RF(Bluetooth),
embedded ARM etc.

My dev board came from Gowin and is a DK-START-GW1N4 (yes they missed
the hyphen between the N and the 4 !)

I\'ve spent most of today messing with the tools and the board - the
constraints system is not as nice as Lattice but easier to understand
than Altera.

The tools think that a 27 bit counter can crank at about 130MHz - I\'m
about ready to stop playing and actually make it do something better
than blinking an LED.

Sorry about Mk x - as you said, some local lingo is so ingrained you
are quite unaware of it.

I wouldn\'t put it in a document, mine are usually Issue N.

The Gowin board has almost all the pins available and seems OK - it uses
the 144 pin chip (about $90).

There is a nice cheap board from Trenz (about $30) with the GW1N-9 in 88
pin QFN on it but not all the pins are accessible.

https://shop.trenz-electronic.de/en/TEC0117-01-FPGA-Module-with-GOWIN-LittleBee-and-8-MByte-internal-SDRAM?c=504

Antti Lukats, who used to post here works there now.

MK
 
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 12:32:48 PM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 16:42, Rick C wrote:
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 4:50:28 AM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 08:01, Rick C wrote:
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.

I know the tech rep for Gowin in the UK so I knew who to talk to, but it
was quite encouraging.
I have a little dev board to play with and I\'ve installed the tools.
The general impression I get is that it\'s like some of the Lattice folk
moved and set up Lattice Mk 2.
For you and me, as long term Lattice users, it feels very comfortable.

I\'ve heard that a lot. I use a Lattice XP device in a current design. I wonder if my Chinese Lattice programming cable will work with the Gowin devices?


I\'ve been quoted a *lot* less than Mouser for the 8k LUT part with on
chip 8Mbyte SDRAM (1k.
I haven\'t bought any yet - so I have no info re. delivery performance etc.
The 88 pin QFN package with SDRAM inside is pretty cool, tiny (10mm
square) but about 60 truly available pins and none used up by memory.
0.4mm pitch but I\'ve done that on QFN before (in prototypes) with no
problems.

The 100 QFP I\'m using is 0.5 mm pitch and I have no trouble with it. At 6/6 design rules 0.4 mm pitch is still very practical.


Apparently the 2 and 4k LUT parts with on board 60MHz Cortex M3 are dead
cheap too.

One problem with Gowin is even though I\'ve looked at the parts many, many times, I can\'t tell you which parts those are. I\'m not a fan of their system of numbering and their lack of product selection guides. It\'s probably been almost a year since I\'ve looked at them hard though.

Here is an issue, the web site mentions the GW1N-2, but I can\'t find a data sheet on it. Is that a product???


I mean to play with it over the weekend - I\'ll let you know how it goes.

The 8k part has 10 DSP modules, which at a casual glance are the same as
Lattices in the XP2.

Multiplier/DSP modules are a requirement for this design. I don\'t want to be making multipliers out of fabric.

Mostly I need to see lower pricing and I need to believe they will be around in 10 years, oh, and produce will be available without long waits. I had contact with a local Gowin sales person a while back. I\'ll try writing him.


Which dev board do you have, the Sipeed Tang Nano thing? I\'ve thought about getting that board with a display, but 1 kLUTs is not very big. I guess Sipeed went for low price.


As an aside, maybe you can explain the MK 2 thing. I understand it means \"Mark 2\" which is rev 2. But why? I\'m working with mostly Brits and they keep labeling the docs as rev x.y or Mk x.y randomly. I\'ve even seen them use rev x.y in the file name and MK x.y in the text of the file.

Why mix terms like this? Not sure why it bugs me, but I guess it\'s just that I\'m not familiar with it and it\'s not glazed donuts per bald eagle.

I try to avoid US lingo, but sometimes I don\'t know I\'m using it. Once in the conference call I said something was about as big as a quarter not realizing no one even knew what a \"quarter\" was much less how big it is. Then I tend to use inches which the Brits don\'t know even though they invented them! Brits gave up on that crap a long time ago and we are rather stuck in the rut here in the US. They use an odd metric number and I have to find my calculator to convert, lol.

Certainly Gowin\'s part numbering is confusing !

GW1N-1xxxx is a 1k LUT
GW1N-4xxxx is a 2k LUT part

But there are loads of parts in each size with letters replacing my xxx
to denote what features there are out of RAM, SDRAM, RF(Bluetooth),
embedded ARM etc.

My dev board came from Gowin and is a DK-START-GW1N4 (yes they missed
the hyphen between the N and the 4 !)

I\'ve spent most of today messing with the tools and the board - the
constraints system is not as nice as Lattice but easier to understand
than Altera.

The tools think that a 27 bit counter can crank at about 130MHz - I\'m
about ready to stop playing and actually make it do something better
than blinking an LED.

Sorry about Mk x - as you said, some local lingo is so ingrained you
are quite unaware of it.

I wouldn\'t put it in a document, mine are usually Issue N.

The Gowin board has almost all the pins available and seems OK - it uses
the 144 pin chip (about $90).

There is a nice cheap board from Trenz (about $30) with the GW1N-9 in 88
pin QFN on it but not all the pins are accessible.

https://shop.trenz-electronic.de/en/TEC0117-01-FPGA-Module-with-GOWIN-LittleBee-and-8-MByte-internal-SDRAM?c=504

Antti Lukats, who used to post here works there now.

Yes, he was big in small things I seem to recall. I think he made a tiny board with a very tiny BGA FPGA once. Probably an iCE40 device, but I don\'t recall for sure.

The module is interesting. That is the package I would like to use if not the part. The 48 pin QFN is I/O limited in this design.

I think the -2 and -4 parts are 2k and 4k LUTs, well 3500 anyway for the -4.. They just don\'t seem to be pushing the -2 parts and I wonder if they are going away.

I need to keep the list of issues short and I\'m just not sure about these parts. I need to talk to the salesman.

--

Rick C.

-- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 12:32:48 PM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 16:42, Rick C wrote:
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 4:50:28 AM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 08:01, Rick C wrote:
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.

I know the tech rep for Gowin in the UK so I knew who to talk to, but it
was quite encouraging.
I have a little dev board to play with and I\'ve installed the tools.
The general impression I get is that it\'s like some of the Lattice folk
moved and set up Lattice Mk 2.
For you and me, as long term Lattice users, it feels very comfortable.

I\'ve heard that a lot. I use a Lattice XP device in a current design. I wonder if my Chinese Lattice programming cable will work with the Gowin devices?


I\'ve been quoted a *lot* less than Mouser for the 8k LUT part with on
chip 8Mbyte SDRAM (1k.
I haven\'t bought any yet - so I have no info re. delivery performance etc.
The 88 pin QFN package with SDRAM inside is pretty cool, tiny (10mm
square) but about 60 truly available pins and none used up by memory.
0.4mm pitch but I\'ve done that on QFN before (in prototypes) with no
problems.

The 100 QFP I\'m using is 0.5 mm pitch and I have no trouble with it. At 6/6 design rules 0.4 mm pitch is still very practical.


Apparently the 2 and 4k LUT parts with on board 60MHz Cortex M3 are dead
cheap too.

One problem with Gowin is even though I\'ve looked at the parts many, many times, I can\'t tell you which parts those are. I\'m not a fan of their system of numbering and their lack of product selection guides. It\'s probably been almost a year since I\'ve looked at them hard though.

Here is an issue, the web site mentions the GW1N-2, but I can\'t find a data sheet on it. Is that a product???


I mean to play with it over the weekend - I\'ll let you know how it goes.

The 8k part has 10 DSP modules, which at a casual glance are the same as
Lattices in the XP2.

Multiplier/DSP modules are a requirement for this design. I don\'t want to be making multipliers out of fabric.

Mostly I need to see lower pricing and I need to believe they will be around in 10 years, oh, and produce will be available without long waits. I had contact with a local Gowin sales person a while back. I\'ll try writing him.


Which dev board do you have, the Sipeed Tang Nano thing? I\'ve thought about getting that board with a display, but 1 kLUTs is not very big. I guess Sipeed went for low price.


As an aside, maybe you can explain the MK 2 thing. I understand it means \"Mark 2\" which is rev 2. But why? I\'m working with mostly Brits and they keep labeling the docs as rev x.y or Mk x.y randomly. I\'ve even seen them use rev x.y in the file name and MK x.y in the text of the file.

Why mix terms like this? Not sure why it bugs me, but I guess it\'s just that I\'m not familiar with it and it\'s not glazed donuts per bald eagle.

I try to avoid US lingo, but sometimes I don\'t know I\'m using it. Once in the conference call I said something was about as big as a quarter not realizing no one even knew what a \"quarter\" was much less how big it is. Then I tend to use inches which the Brits don\'t know even though they invented them! Brits gave up on that crap a long time ago and we are rather stuck in the rut here in the US. They use an odd metric number and I have to find my calculator to convert, lol.

Certainly Gowin\'s part numbering is confusing !

GW1N-1xxxx is a 1k LUT
GW1N-4xxxx is a 2k LUT part

But there are loads of parts in each size with letters replacing my xxx
to denote what features there are out of RAM, SDRAM, RF(Bluetooth),
embedded ARM etc.

My dev board came from Gowin and is a DK-START-GW1N4 (yes they missed
the hyphen between the N and the 4 !)

I\'ve spent most of today messing with the tools and the board - the
constraints system is not as nice as Lattice but easier to understand
than Altera.

The tools think that a 27 bit counter can crank at about 130MHz - I\'m
about ready to stop playing and actually make it do something better
than blinking an LED.

Sorry about Mk x - as you said, some local lingo is so ingrained you
are quite unaware of it.

I wouldn\'t put it in a document, mine are usually Issue N.

The Gowin board has almost all the pins available and seems OK - it uses
the 144 pin chip (about $90).

There is a nice cheap board from Trenz (about $30) with the GW1N-9 in 88
pin QFN on it but not all the pins are accessible.

https://shop.trenz-electronic.de/en/TEC0117-01-FPGA-Module-with-GOWIN-LittleBee-and-8-MByte-internal-SDRAM?c=504

Antti Lukats, who used to post here works there now.

MK

I see Gowin has an $80 programming cable. I bet it\'s not much different from the ones I use with Lattice. A web page says the FTDI 2232H is identified as \"GOWIN USB CABLE (FT2CH)\". I\'d like to put the FTDI chip on our board so we can just use a USB cable without anything special. Most likely the software guys will need to flash the chips. I guess we could have the processor do it, but that means the code has to be written and working first.

Better to have a cable to fall back on.

--

Rick C.

-+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 3:01:32 AM UTC-4, Rick C wrote:
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.

Sometimes I wonder about companies and if they really want customers. I realized my copy of the GW1N datasheet might be out of date, so I wanted to check that. I clicked through their menu structure to the web page for their LittleBee® devices and hit the button to bring up the GW1N info. Then I clicked documentation... only to find a listing of every document for every different line of devices in the LittleBee® family, 8 pages worth. No way to sort, no way to search.

I had the old document open and found a number, DS100 which a search for pulled up one item. Much better. But now I can\'t download it because I\'m not logged in. So I log in, but does it take me back to the search results page? No, I\'m on the Profile page for my login. I find my way back and download the document.

Now, after trying to remember why I was looking for the data sheet in the first place, I find the table of devices and packages contain I/O counts... except for the -2 devices. They only have check marks. What\'s up with that??? Maybe it\'s because they aren\'t making -2 devices yet. Then I realize the -6 column is entirely gone! I guess they decided they don\'t need no stinkin\' -6 devices and have dropped the plans for them.

In talking to distribution it seems they know little about this company. Like a typical, data hungry engineer, I was hoping to get pricing and delivery on every part in the lineup. Distribution seemed to resist that idea. I guess maybe this generates extra work for them we don\'t see. I know companies tend to want followup on inquiries.

It bugs me that they can\'t do a better job with the web site and the presentation of their technical info in general. They seem to not understand the concept of a selection guide or the utility of overviews of products, comparisons and contrasts rather than expecting a designer to wade through a bunch of data. I love data as much as the next guy, but having a road map to show me where I should direct my search is a good idea too.

Anyway, now that I spent 10 minutes whining about them wasting 10 minutes of my time, the pricing I\'m getting on -4 and -9 parts seem to be VERY good. I shouldn\'t blab out of school, but the numbers are far below Mouser prices and much more in line with the Edge prices. Seems they are only selling the fastest version of the chips because the yield rates are so good. I asked about the -4 parts and with some arm twisting also got pricing on some -9 parts. I expect to be using the -9 when I have a board respin to replace an EOL Lattice part.

--

Rick C.

+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 12:32:48 PM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 16:42, Rick C wrote:
On Saturday, August 29, 2020 at 4:50:28 AM UTC-4, Michael Kellett wrote:
On 29/08/2020 08:01, Rick C wrote:
I\'m looking at using Gowin in a design and I not sure about them. They are being sold at Mouser, but the prices are not so great. Their cheapest 1 kLUT chips are not too bad at $3@1k, but from there the prices run up quickly, $8@1k for the 4 kLUT device. I thought they had a 2 kLUT device but not at Mouser.

Edge Electronics lists the 4 kLUT device for $3.50 qty 1. I\'ve written them for delivery. We\'ll see what they say.

I know the tech rep for Gowin in the UK so I knew who to talk to, but it
was quite encouraging.
I have a little dev board to play with and I\'ve installed the tools.
The general impression I get is that it\'s like some of the Lattice folk
moved and set up Lattice Mk 2.
For you and me, as long term Lattice users, it feels very comfortable.

I\'ve heard that a lot. I use a Lattice XP device in a current design. I wonder if my Chinese Lattice programming cable will work with the Gowin devices?


I\'ve been quoted a *lot* less than Mouser for the 8k LUT part with on
chip 8Mbyte SDRAM (1k.
I haven\'t bought any yet - so I have no info re. delivery performance etc.
The 88 pin QFN package with SDRAM inside is pretty cool, tiny (10mm
square) but about 60 truly available pins and none used up by memory.
0.4mm pitch but I\'ve done that on QFN before (in prototypes) with no
problems.

The 100 QFP I\'m using is 0.5 mm pitch and I have no trouble with it. At 6/6 design rules 0.4 mm pitch is still very practical.


Apparently the 2 and 4k LUT parts with on board 60MHz Cortex M3 are dead
cheap too.

One problem with Gowin is even though I\'ve looked at the parts many, many times, I can\'t tell you which parts those are. I\'m not a fan of their system of numbering and their lack of product selection guides. It\'s probably been almost a year since I\'ve looked at them hard though.

Here is an issue, the web site mentions the GW1N-2, but I can\'t find a data sheet on it. Is that a product???


I mean to play with it over the weekend - I\'ll let you know how it goes.

The 8k part has 10 DSP modules, which at a casual glance are the same as
Lattices in the XP2.

Multiplier/DSP modules are a requirement for this design. I don\'t want to be making multipliers out of fabric.

Mostly I need to see lower pricing and I need to believe they will be around in 10 years, oh, and produce will be available without long waits. I had contact with a local Gowin sales person a while back. I\'ll try writing him.


Which dev board do you have, the Sipeed Tang Nano thing? I\'ve thought about getting that board with a display, but 1 kLUTs is not very big. I guess Sipeed went for low price.


As an aside, maybe you can explain the MK 2 thing. I understand it means \"Mark 2\" which is rev 2. But why? I\'m working with mostly Brits and they keep labeling the docs as rev x.y or Mk x.y randomly. I\'ve even seen them use rev x.y in the file name and MK x.y in the text of the file.

Why mix terms like this? Not sure why it bugs me, but I guess it\'s just that I\'m not familiar with it and it\'s not glazed donuts per bald eagle.

I try to avoid US lingo, but sometimes I don\'t know I\'m using it. Once in the conference call I said something was about as big as a quarter not realizing no one even knew what a \"quarter\" was much less how big it is. Then I tend to use inches which the Brits don\'t know even though they invented them! Brits gave up on that crap a long time ago and we are rather stuck in the rut here in the US. They use an odd metric number and I have to find my calculator to convert, lol.

Certainly Gowin\'s part numbering is confusing !

GW1N-1xxxx is a 1k LUT
GW1N-4xxxx is a 2k LUT part

But there are loads of parts in each size with letters replacing my xxx
to denote what features there are out of RAM, SDRAM, RF(Bluetooth),
embedded ARM etc.

My dev board came from Gowin and is a DK-START-GW1N4 (yes they missed
the hyphen between the N and the 4 !)

I\'ve spent most of today messing with the tools and the board - the
constraints system is not as nice as Lattice but easier to understand
than Altera.

The tools think that a 27 bit counter can crank at about 130MHz - I\'m
about ready to stop playing and actually make it do something better
than blinking an LED.

Sorry about Mk x - as you said, some local lingo is so ingrained you
are quite unaware of it.

I wouldn\'t put it in a document, mine are usually Issue N.

The Gowin board has almost all the pins available and seems OK - it uses
the 144 pin chip (about $90).

There is a nice cheap board from Trenz (about $30) with the GW1N-9 in 88
pin QFN on it but not all the pins are accessible.

https://shop.trenz-electronic.de/en/TEC0117-01-FPGA-Module-with-GOWIN-LittleBee-and-8-MByte-internal-SDRAM?c=504

Antti Lukats, who used to post here works there now.

MK

I think I figured out why you would use MK 2 instead of rev. Must get confusing when you use your initials on a comment or change. lol

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top