Answers Urgently Required

me wrote:

Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote in
news:ns23j.55$tb7.10@newsfe05.lga:


Don Bowey wrote:


On 11/27/07 2:59 PM, in article 9h13j.46$tb7.33@newsfe05.lga, "Jamie"
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:



Go away little boy. You bore me.


AND I REPEAT:

" Typical useless post.

If you had an ounce of capability you would make some attempt to
learn where you might be wrong, or post a technically competent
justification.

But, since you don't, all you can do is post more crap.

You're as useless as your posts."

You are showing yourself to be technically incompetent boob. Don't
you even care?


Ha, what an idiot.

Do you always sit for hours and paint a picture of some one that you
absolutely know nothing of?

You seem to have an obsession with me. May I suggest, you might be
in dire need of help? Not that i'm not flatter with all the attention
you're giving me.


snip

Yes, you are being flattened....
Oops, guess I miss that one :)
Click to expand...

Oh well, things that happen when you're having so much fun :)


--
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
In article <QV33j.384$tb7.321@newsfe05.lga>, Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"

Seems to me you reached that conclusion a bit too late...
 
On 11/27/07 4:19 PM, in article ns23j.55$tb7.10@newsfe05.lga, "Jamie"
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

Don Bowey wrote:

On 11/27/07 2:59 PM, in article 9h13j.46$tb7.33@newsfe05.lga, "Jamie"
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:




Go away little boy. You bore me.


AND I REPEAT:

" Typical useless post.

If you had an ounce of capability you would make some attempt to learn
where you might be wrong, or post a technically competent justification.

But, since you don't, all you can do is post more crap.

You're as useless as your posts."

You are showing yourself to be technically incompetent boob. Don't you even
care?

Ha, what an idiot.

Do you always sit for hours and paint a picture of some one that you
absolutely know nothing of?
Click to expand...
(snip useless drivel)

More smoke and mirrors on your part. I know about you, what is relevant to
this thread: You posted bad information and you can't stand having anyone
correct you.

Hours? That's laughable, as it takes only seconds; a brief look at your
post, to see it is wrong. Garbage comes to mind.

You're a real mess.
 
Doug Miller wrote:

In article <QV33j.384$tb7.321@newsfe05.lga>, Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"

Seems to me you reached that conclusion a bit too late...
Click to expand...
I don't know how to take that.. So I'll leave it at that.

Just remember, DNA in Maine has a narrow selection from which
I came. "Men from Maine" where they say,"We're all related"

So with that, this will be my last for the night, I'll be thinking
of you all tomorrow at work while I have my head bury deep in the
cesspool or circuits.

Oh btw,
for all you retired US citizens collection from the system, be happy
that i'm still willing to work, supporting the program to keep you old
guys cozy in your nice chairs while sitting back enjoying life..

For those that just are to damn lazy to work and some how have
managed to get your self on SSI.. Screw you!.. You should be ashamed
of your self and have no right to opinion in this country what so ever.


--
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
Don Bowey wrote:

On 11/27/07 4:19 PM, in article ns23j.55$tb7.10@newsfe05.lga, "Jamie"
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:


Don Bowey wrote:


On 11/27/07 2:59 PM, in article 9h13j.46$tb7.33@newsfe05.lga, "Jamie"
jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:



Go away little boy. You bore me.


AND I REPEAT:

" Typical useless post.

If you had an ounce of capability you would make some attempt to learn
where you might be wrong, or post a technically competent justification.

But, since you don't, all you can do is post more crap.

You're as useless as your posts."

You are showing yourself to be technically incompetent boob. Don't you even
care?


Ha, what an idiot.

Do you always sit for hours and paint a picture of some one that you
absolutely know nothing of?


(snip useless drivel)

More smoke and mirrors on your part. I know about you, what is relevant to
this thread: You posted bad information and you can't stand having anyone
correct you.

Hours? That's laughable, as it takes only seconds; a brief look at your
post, to see it is wrong. Garbage comes to mind.

You're a real mess.

Now I'm going to be honest as best I can.
Click to expand...

You really do have a problem.

I'm now placing a filter on you so that I don't get
tempted to reply to any more of your insidious lectures
that makes absolutely no sense.. Words from a demented
person.

Please get that little mans disease problem corrected, other
wise, it might be your demise.

Seriously.

Bye.





--
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
On 11/27/07 7:34 PM, in article wi53j.154$cD1.7@newsfe07.lga, "Jamie"
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@charter.net> wrote:

(snip the top end)

Now I'm going to be honest as best I can.

You really do have a problem.

I'm now placing a filter on you so that I don't get
tempted to reply to any more of your insidious lectures
that makes absolutely no sense.. Words from a demented
person.

Please get that little mans disease problem corrected, other
wise, it might be your demise.

Seriously.

Bye.
Click to expand...
You still can't address the technical issue of your posting technical
crap....

Well, by now at least some of the folks that frequent s.e.b. know you for
what you are; an irresponsible, prattling dim bulb.
 
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:35:42 -0500, Richard Seriani wrote:
navsince1987@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:34ef0c09-fc20-4b24-a827-cd6a89af03af@j20g2000hsi.googlegroups.com...
Q1- Capaitors are open for dc frequency why.?
View in fixed font
dc---------->| |
Capacitor---| |----
| |
As you can see, dc, being a straight line, hits the plate of the
capacitor and stops.
Q2-Capacitors are short for AC analysis is generally short. why..?
On the other hand, ac, if the correct frequency, can go around and
through the space in capacitor plates.

/\
---| \ |----
/ \
ac/ \

Q3-For what frequencies, we open capacitors even when we are doing ac-
analysis.Why we do so ?

All frequencies we want to. Because.

Q4-Do frequency range effects the role of capacitor?

Sometimes. Depends on the capacitor's agent and how the producer and
director feel.
Click to expand...
LOL!!!

Thanks!
Rich
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top