Another Wind Power Technology Being Installed On Tankers And Container Ships...

[Fred Bloggs]

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/

 

[a a]

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower


Never promote fake

 

[Lasse Langwadt Christensen]

fredag den 19. august 2022 kl. 16.11.01 UTC+2 skrev a a:

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower

sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....

 

[a a]

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 16:24:00 UTC+2, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:

fredag den 19. august 2022 kl. 16.11.01 UTC+2 skrev a a:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower
sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....

you are not right
therere is no need to build 1000 tons of concrete foundation for a wind tower
since you can drill the rock and insert vertic al tower into it

My friend built the tallest vertical axis wind turbines in the world, made of independent vertical segments

and lost all his money to never having read the below


===How to calculate the power generated by a wind turbine?

To calculate wind turbine power, you need to estimate two values: the available wind power and the efficiency of the wind turbine. Multiplying these two values produces an estimate of the output power of the wind turbine. Below you can find the whole procedure:

Sweep area of the turbine

Before finding the wind power, you need to determine the swept area of the turbine according to the following equations:

For HAWT: A = π * L²

For VAWT: A = D * H

where:

L is the blade length – the radius of the horizontal-axis turbine

D is the diameter

H is the turbine height

-----
So what matters in caase of wind turbines is
swept area by a rotor
catching the wind energy
if swept area is low
so generated energy output is low

since efficiency comes with upper power limit
called
the turbine efficiency. It must be lower than the Betz limit (59.3%), and is typically between 30-40%


https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_calculate_the_rotational_speed_of_a_wind_turbine#:~:text=wind%20energy%20extracted%20by%20wind%20turbine%20is%20decided,Tor%20x%20Vr.%20%28Tor%3A%20Torque%3B%20Vr%3A%20rotation%20speed%29


https://windcycle.energy/wind_turbine_calculator/

---

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/

I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 1:08:06 AM UTC+10, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/

I bet that would blow away in a storm.

How much? You could go into business insuring them against the risk.

> The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

A lot of the stuff you sell would have been hard to put together in 1926. It\'s possible that today\'s version of the Flettner Rotor would have advantages that the 1926 version didn\'t.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT), a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 16:24:00 UTC+2, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
fredag den 19. august 2022 kl. 16.11.01 UTC+2 skrev a a:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower
sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....
you are not right
therere is no need to build 1000 tons of concrete foundation for a wind tower
since you can drill the rock and insert vertic al tower into it

On a ship? Or in Louisiana?

There are lots of utubes of wind turbines falling over. They usually
tip over giant concrete pads when they fall.

My friend built the tallest vertical axis wind turbines in the world, made of independent vertical segments

and lost all his money to never having read the below


====
How to calculate the power generated by a wind turbine?

To calculate wind turbine power, you need to estimate two values: the available wind power and the efficiency of the wind turbine. Multiplying these two values produces an estimate of the output power of the wind turbine. Below you can find the whole procedure:

Sweep area of the turbine

Before finding the wind power, you need to determine the swept area of the turbine according to the following equations:

For HAWT: A = ? * L²

For VAWT: A = D * H

where:

L is the blade length – the radius of the horizontal-axis turbine

D is the diameter

H is the turbine height

-----

Multiply by Kw * Kb * Kn

Kw is fraction of time wind is blowing

Kb is fraction it\'s not broken

Kn is fraction of time the network wants the power..

Typical products are around 0.25

 

[a a]

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 17:08:06 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

Especially in Europe
budget money fund fake projects , so -called r&d innovations
since control teams from Brussels have nothing to do with engineering
so Bs of euros are wasted in fake projects
generating losses

 

[a a]

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 17:21:08 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 16:24:00 UTC+2, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
fredag den 19. august 2022 kl. 16.11.01 UTC+2 skrev a a:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower
sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....
you are not right
therere is no need to build 1000 tons of concrete foundation for a wind tower
since you can drill the rock and insert vertic al tower into it
On a ship? Or in Louisiana?

There are lots of utubes of wind turbines falling over. They usually
tip over giant concrete pads when they fall.

My friend built the tallest vertical axis wind turbines in the world, made of independent vertical segments

and lost all his money to never having read the below


====
How to calculate the power generated by a wind turbine?

To calculate wind turbine power, you need to estimate two values: the available wind power and the efficiency of the wind turbine. Multiplying these two values produces an estimate of the output power of the wind turbine. Below you can find the whole procedure:

Sweep area of the turbine

Before finding the wind power, you need to determine the swept area of the turbine according to the following equations:

For HAWT: A = ? * L²

For VAWT: A = D * H

where:

L is the blade length – the radius of the horizontal-axis turbine

D is the diameter

H is the turbine height

stop your delusional day dreaming
he meant large power horizontal axis wind turbine

----> >> > Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower

sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....
you are not right
therere is no need to build 1000 tons of concrete foundation for a wind tower
since you can drill the rock and insert vertic al tower into it
On a ship? Or in Louisiana?

don\'t drink
small power HWT are installed on ships, jachts, boats

VWT is fake
since power generated is low due to low swept area to be cut by 2

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:30:40 -0700 (PDT), a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 17:21:08 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 16:24:00 UTC+2, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
fredag den 19. august 2022 kl. 16.11.01 UTC+2 skrev a a:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower
sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....
you are not right
therere is no need to build 1000 tons of concrete foundation for a wind tower
since you can drill the rock and insert vertic al tower into it
On a ship? Or in Louisiana?

There are lots of utubes of wind turbines falling over. They usually
tip over giant concrete pads when they fall.

My friend built the tallest vertical axis wind turbines in the world, made of independent vertical segments

and lost all his money to never having read the below


====
How to calculate the power generated by a wind turbine?

To calculate wind turbine power, you need to estimate two values: the available wind power and the efficiency of the wind turbine. Multiplying these two values produces an estimate of the output power of the wind turbine. Below you can find the whole procedure:

Sweep area of the turbine

Before finding the wind power, you need to determine the swept area of the turbine according to the following equations:

For HAWT: A = ? * L²

For VAWT: A = D * H

where:

L is the blade length – the radius of the horizontal-axis turbine

D is the diameter

H is the turbine height




stop your delusional day dreaming

You snip things you can\'t dispute. Or maybe can\'t understand.

>he meant large power horizontal axis wind turbine

Yes, the thing your buddy lost his fortune on. He obviously didn\'t do
the math.

 

[a a]

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 18:19:31 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:30:40 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 17:21:08 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 16:24:00 UTC+2, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
fredag den 19. august 2022 kl. 16.11.01 UTC+2 skrev a a:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower
sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....
you are not right
therere is no need to build 1000 tons of concrete foundation for a wind tower
since you can drill the rock and insert vertic al tower into it
On a ship? Or in Louisiana?

There are lots of utubes of wind turbines falling over. They usually
tip over giant concrete pads when they fall.

My friend built the tallest vertical axis wind turbines in the world, made of independent vertical segments

and lost all his money to never having read the below


====
How to calculate the power generated by a wind turbine?

To calculate wind turbine power, you need to estimate two values: the available wind power and the efficiency of the wind turbine. Multiplying these two values produces an estimate of the output power of the wind turbine. Below you can find the whole procedure:

Sweep area of the turbine

Before finding the wind power, you need to determine the swept area of the turbine according to the following equations:

For HAWT: A = ? * L²

For VAWT: A = D * H

where:

L is the blade length – the radius of the horizontal-axis turbine

D is the diameter

H is the turbine height




stop your delusional day dreaming
You snip things you can\'t dispute. Or maybe can\'t understand.
he meant large power horizontal axis wind turbine
Yes, the thing your buddy lost his fortune on. He obviously didn\'t do
the math.
you are stupid dog

--he meant large power horizontal axis wind turbine installed on the ground

my friend invested Ms in vertical axis wind turbines, as he exactly didn\'t master basics of physics at primary school
and he has lost all of his money

since vertical axis wind turbine is always low power turbine,

since
cross section area of VAWT, so called swept area is always very low, to generate any wind energy of interest to us

If you make rotor of VAWT as a single part, so lower part of the rotor slows down the rotational speed of the rotor since
wind speed increases with altitute,

so he designed his tallest in the world VAWT turbines to be made of independent rotating segments put into the same axis


But his efforts lack any sense
since what matters in case of VAWT is swept area and to increase the swept area you need to increase the diameter of the rotor

But we all know , vertically rotated structure to be stable, should be suppported on the ground or have diameter limited,
not to crash, if exposed to strong wind.

But there is no technology to build large diameter VAWT

So smart guys don\'t invest a single penny into VAWT fake to waste

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT), a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 18:19:31 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 08:30:40 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:

On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 17:21:08 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 16:24:00 UTC+2, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
fredag den 19. august 2022 kl. 16.11.01 UTC+2 skrev a a:
On Friday, 19 August 2022 at 15:58:28 UTC+2, Fred Bloggs wrote:
All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
fake, low power vertical wind turbines never worked in the past

To calculate the power output of the wind turbine you need to calculate the surface of the cross-section catching the wind

So hight x width/ 2 since half of the rotor is wasting wind energy, braking it

So it\'s easy to know that every vertical axis wind turbine is time and money waster as a source of low power energy, not deserving a since penny invested in.



Horizontal axis wind turbines can generate up to 7MW nominal output electrical energy for a single tower
sure it is just a +100m tower anchored in a few 1000 tons of concrete with +150m diameter rotor ....
you are not right
therere is no need to build 1000 tons of concrete foundation for a wind tower
since you can drill the rock and insert vertic al tower into it
On a ship? Or in Louisiana?

There are lots of utubes of wind turbines falling over. They usually
tip over giant concrete pads when they fall.

My friend built the tallest vertical axis wind turbines in the world, made of independent vertical segments

and lost all his money to never having read the below


====
How to calculate the power generated by a wind turbine?

To calculate wind turbine power, you need to estimate two values: the available wind power and the efficiency of the wind turbine. Multiplying these two values produces an estimate of the output power of the wind turbine. Below you can find the whole procedure:

Sweep area of the turbine

Before finding the wind power, you need to determine the swept area of the turbine according to the following equations:

For HAWT: A = ? * L²

For VAWT: A = D * H

where:

L is the blade length – the radius of the horizontal-axis turbine

D is the diameter

H is the turbine height




stop your delusional day dreaming
You snip things you can\'t dispute. Or maybe can\'t understand.
he meant large power horizontal axis wind turbine
Yes, the thing your buddy lost his fortune on. He obviously didn\'t do
the math.
you are stupid dog

Well, I haven\'t lost any fortunes yet.

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf

They have been installing the things since 2014. Somewhat less than
one ship per year, says Wikipedia. It doesn\'t seem wildly popular.

Surely they will run out of money at that rate.

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 9:08:10 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf
They have been installing the things since 2014. Somewhat less than
one ship per year, says Wikipedia. It doesn\'t seem wildly popular.

Surely they will run out of money at that rate.

\"The main investors supporting Norsepower are Power Fund III, OGCI Climate Investments, our first venture capital investor Lifeline Ventures Oy, EAKR Aloitusrahasto Oy, Valve Ventures Oy and Korkia Venture Insight. Norsepower is also funded by TEKES – the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, and the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.\"

https://www.norsepower.com/story/

They\'ll be coming into their own shortly as soon as all the clean shipping regulations start kicking in. Dirty ships won\'t be allowed in port.

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 9:08:10 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf
They have been installing the things since 2014. Somewhat less than
one ship per year, says Wikipedia. It doesn\'t seem wildly popular.

Surely they will run out of money at that rate.

Here are some of the investors- these people are no amateurs:

https://pitchbook.com/profiles/fund/16707-88F

https://www.ogci.com/climate-investments/

State owned Finnvera:
Finnvera is a state-owned special financier and Finland\'s official export guarantee institution Export Credit Agency (ECA).
https://www.finnvera.fi/finnvera/tietoa-finnverasta

https://fundit.fr/en/institutions/finnish-funding-agency-innovation-tekes

and finally:
https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en

They\'re in the money as long as they keep getting results...

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 9:08:10 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf
They have been installing the things since 2014. Somewhat less than
one ship per year, says Wikipedia. It doesn\'t seem wildly popular.

Surely they will run out of money at that rate.

\"The main investors supporting Norsepower are Power Fund III, OGCI Climate Investments, our first venture capital investor Lifeline Ventures Oy, EAKR Aloitusrahasto Oy, Valve Ventures Oy and Korkia Venture Insight. Norsepower is also funded by TEKES – the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, and the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.\"

All the more to lose. Investors don\'t create success; customers do.

https://www.norsepower.com/story/

They\'ll be coming into their own shortly as soon as all the clean shipping regulations start kicking in. Dirty ships won\'t be allowed in port.

They installed a system on a Maersk ship in 2018. Why has Maersk not
ordered more?

I guess dirty ships will have to hire clean tugs.

 

[server]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:34:55 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 9:08:10 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf
They have been installing the things since 2014. Somewhat less than
one ship per year, says Wikipedia. It doesn\'t seem wildly popular.

Surely they will run out of money at that rate.

Here are some of the investors- these people are no amateurs:

https://pitchbook.com/profiles/fund/16707-88F

https://www.ogci.com/climate-investments/

State owned Finnvera:
Finnvera is a state-owned special financier and Finland\'s official export guarantee institution Export Credit Agency (ECA).
https://www.finnvera.fi/finnvera/tietoa-finnverasta

https://fundit.fr/en/institutions/finnish-funding-agency-innovation-tekes

and finally:
https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en

They\'re in the money as long as they keep getting results...

^^^^^^^^
investors

 

[a a]

On Saturday, 20 August 2022 at 04:58:27 UTC+2, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:34:55 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 9:08:10 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf
They have been installing the things since 2014. Somewhat less than
one ship per year, says Wikipedia. It doesn\'t seem wildly popular.

Surely they will run out of money at that rate.

Here are some of the investors- these people are no amateurs:

https://pitchbook.com/profiles/fund/16707-88F

https://www.ogci.com/climate-investments/

State owned Finnvera:
Finnvera is a state-owned special financier and Finland\'s official export guarantee institution Export Credit Agency (ECA).
https://www.finnvera.fi/finnvera/tietoa-finnverasta

https://fundit.fr/en/institutions/finnish-funding-agency-innovation-tekes

and finally:
https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en

They\'re in the money as long as they keep getting results...
^^^^^^^^
investors
fake is fake to make easy money fast

--Fake Wind Power Technology Being Installed On Fake Tankers And Fake Container Ships

ask your friends to get tutition fee back


Norsepower Rotor Sails neither generate any energy nor move a ship forward
due to high mass and length of a tanker or a container ship

What is really generated are high power infrasonics, infrasonic vibrations which kill humans and destroy steel structure of the vessel.

but fake is fake
and deserves no our attention
and should be banned and penalized on the internet as an example of delusional day dreaming fantasy,
published 100 years ago

 

[Fred Bloggs]

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 10:57:29 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:21:32 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 9:08:10 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 17:44:27 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 11:08:06 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 06:58:24 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

All these technologies are 10x more effective than conventional sails and result in 30% fuel savings. This one just got a big installation contract:

https://www.norsepower.com/technology/
I bet that would blow away in a storm.

The site says that the first ship application was in 1926. I see a lot
of cargo ships on the bay and none have these things.

They already have an installed base. If you look in technical brochure, even the smallest model weighs 20 tons welded steel and securely fastened to a 9 ton foundation which itself is welded to hull. They list \"survival\" wind speed of 70 m/s for all the models, which is say 160 MPH. I take that to be sustained, so it\'s like 2x anything they will ever see at sea. Every ship is a custom job and may require multiple sails.
https://www.norsepower.com/download/brochure.pdf
They have been installing the things since 2014. Somewhat less than
one ship per year, says Wikipedia. It doesn\'t seem wildly popular.

Surely they will run out of money at that rate.

\"The main investors supporting Norsepower are Power Fund III, OGCI Climate Investments, our first venture capital investor Lifeline Ventures Oy, EAKR Aloitusrahasto Oy, Valve Ventures Oy and Korkia Venture Insight. Norsepower is also funded by TEKES – the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, and the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation.\"
All the more to lose. Investors don\'t create success; customers do.

https://www.norsepower.com/story/

They\'ll be coming into their own shortly as soon as all the clean shipping regulations start kicking in. Dirty ships won\'t be allowed in port.
They installed a system on a Maersk ship in 2018. Why has Maersk not
ordered more?

They trialed it for a few years and the fuel savings came in at only 8%. MAERSK has since sold that proto ship:
https://www.offshore-energy.biz/maersk-tankers-sells-product-tanker-fitted-with-rotor-sails/
MAERSK spokesman says one thing but it looks a lot like they\'re not real impressed with the technology.

I guess dirty ships will have to hire clean tugs.

They won\'t let them get away with that:
https://lowenthal.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-lowenthal-introduces-bill-clean-massive-emissions-generating