another air flow sensor circuit...

[John Larkin]

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zppy7en9noljcfdo0qyv6/Darl_Flow_Sensor_1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=v7jk899m8l1jxz91r05lj6byx

(I hope that link works)

The darlington is a TO-92 sticking up from the PCB into the air
stream.

The idea is to turn on the mosfet for a while to heat up the
darlington, then turn it off and take a few measurements as it cools
down. A few points should be enough to calculate the cool-off time
constant. The thermal tau should drop by about 2:1 from zero air flow
to 200 LFPM.

This is even simpler:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1c779s23si0q6ly4ssu72/Darl_Air_Flow_Sensor_DC1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=75logvs33gcon8xzmtfpmvf7e

We\'d have to turn off the fans and make a baseline ADC measurement to
use as the zero-flow point, which we could do. The more air flow, the
cooler the transistor and the lower the ADC voltage will be.

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:18:22 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
<9g7i8i1v0614uretc6tiabj32ascn2clbd@4ax.com>:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zppy7en9noljcfdo0qyv6/Darl_Flow_Sensor_1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=v7jk899m8l1jxz91r05lj6byx

(I hope that link works)

The darlington is a TO-92 sticking up from the PCB into the air
stream.

The idea is to turn on the mosfet for a while to heat up the
darlington, then turn it off and take a few measurements as it cools
down. A few points should be enough to calculate the cool-off time
constant. The thermal tau should drop by about 2:1 from zero air flow
to 200 LFPM.

Yes, should work.

This is even simpler:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1c779s23si0q6ly4ssu72/Darl_Air_Flow_Sensor_DC1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=75logvs33gcon8xzmtfpmvf7e

We\'d have to turn off the fans and make a baseline ADC measurement to
use as the zero-flow point, which we could do. The more air flow, the
cooler the transistor and the lower the ADC voltage will be.

Is switching fans off for even a short period of time a good idea?

If you use a LM35 and switch off fans and no temperature change in measured then something is wrong (with the fans)
sort of idea would work too and would give you true temperature?

 

[Phil Hobbs]

On 2023-06-13 22:18, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zppy7en9noljcfdo0qyv6/Darl_Flow_Sensor_1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=v7jk899m8l1jxz91r05lj6byx

(I hope that link works)

The darlington is a TO-92 sticking up from the PCB into the air
stream.

The idea is to turn on the mosfet for a while to heat up the
darlington, then turn it off and take a few measurements as it cools
down. A few points should be enough to calculate the cool-off time
constant. The thermal tau should drop by about 2:1 from zero air
flow to 200 LFPM.

This is even simpler:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1c779s23si0q6ly4ssu72/Darl_Air_Flow_Sensor_DC1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=75logvs33gcon8xzmtfpmvf7e

We\'d have to turn off the fans and make a baseline ADC measurement
to use as the zero-flow point, which we could do. The more air flow,
the cooler the transistor and the lower the ADC voltage will be.

I like the general trend.

The problem is a bit on the squishy side anyway, ISTM. It\'s framed as an
airflow measurement, when what you actually care about is whether the
boards in the crate get adequate cooling.

Air flow is one ingredient, but both it and its effects will change in
some dimly-known way, depending on the boards that get put in the crate,
how the dissipation is distributed, the ambient conditions, junk piled
on top, dust inside, and so on and so forth.

So although it would be nice for datasheet purposes, even a
super-accurate, unambiguous measurement of airflow at one position
wouldn\'t make the cooling that much easier to calculate accurately.

So abandoning hot wires, propellers, and so on, in favor of a
measurement of actual board cooling, seems to be at least as valuable.
(You can use some simple approximation to back out an airflow number for
the datasheet.)

So that\'s all pretty sensible, I think.

As the National Semi Temperature Measurement Handbook (2007) says, \"For
sensors in plastic packages like TO-92, SO-8, and SOT-23, the leads
provide the dominant thermal path. Therefore, a board-mounted IC sensor
will do a fine job of measuring the temperature of the circuit
board (especially the traces to which the leads are soldered).\"

That\'s also true for transients, because thermal diffusion in plastic is
almost as poor as its thermal conduction. (The thermal diffusivity of
copper wire is about 6e-5 m**2 s, vs. 2e-7 or so for plastic, so roughly
300x.)

So as long as you don\'t expect the thermal transient to actually be an
exponential, some sort of calibration like that should work OK.

OTOH since it\'s the board you\'ll be measuring anyway, you could just use
an I2C temperature sensor, and heat that with a nearby resistor. Our
fave is the Sensirion SHTC3, which has a very nice humidity sensor as
well--great for dew point estimation.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 05:24:28 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:

On a sunny day (Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:18:22 -0700) it happened John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
9g7i8i1v0614uretc6tiabj32ascn2clbd@4ax.com>:


https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zppy7en9noljcfdo0qyv6/Darl_Flow_Sensor_1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=v7jk899m8l1jxz91r05lj6byx

(I hope that link works)

The darlington is a TO-92 sticking up from the PCB into the air
stream.

The idea is to turn on the mosfet for a while to heat up the
darlington, then turn it off and take a few measurements as it cools
down. A few points should be enough to calculate the cool-off time
constant. The thermal tau should drop by about 2:1 from zero air flow
to 200 LFPM.

Yes, should work.


This is even simpler:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1c779s23si0q6ly4ssu72/Darl_Air_Flow_Sensor_DC1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=75logvs33gcon8xzmtfpmvf7e

We\'d have to turn off the fans and make a baseline ADC measurement to
use as the zero-flow point, which we could do. The more air flow, the
cooler the transistor and the lower the ADC voltage will be.

Is switching fans off for even a short period of time a good idea?

We can do that at powerup, before we enable the plugin cards that use
most of the power.

If you use a LM35 and switch off fans and no temperature change in measured then something is wrong (with the fans)
sort of idea would work too and would give you true temperature?

The idea is to plug eight test/dummy load boards into the crate, to
make sure every slot gets its proper power supplies and talks to the
motherboard. Each board will have programmable dummy loads for the
power busses and of course an FPGA to check the digital stuff. There
will be temperature sensors on eaqch load board, but may as well add
an air flow sensor to make sure each slot can get the air it needs.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/gr57bhafemypi63/P940_box_9.jpg?dl=0

The simple DC circuit is interesting. Given the saved zero
measurement, it needs no sequencing. Just snoop the BIST ADC voltage
whenever we want to know flow.

It does have a bit of positive feedback, actually thermal runaway, but
I\'m guessing only about a 20% gain increase, which would be OK. It
would be fun to Spice it somehow, but that would be a chore. I\'d need
a Darlington model with a realtime temperature input param.

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 08:24:54 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-13 22:18, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zppy7en9noljcfdo0qyv6/Darl_Flow_Sensor_1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=v7jk899m8l1jxz91r05lj6byx

(I hope that link works)

The darlington is a TO-92 sticking up from the PCB into the air
stream.

The idea is to turn on the mosfet for a while to heat up the
darlington, then turn it off and take a few measurements as it cools
down. A few points should be enough to calculate the cool-off time
constant. The thermal tau should drop by about 2:1 from zero air
flow to 200 LFPM.

This is even simpler:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1c779s23si0q6ly4ssu72/Darl_Air_Flow_Sensor_DC1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=75logvs33gcon8xzmtfpmvf7e

We\'d have to turn off the fans and make a baseline ADC measurement
to use as the zero-flow point, which we could do. The more air flow,
the cooler the transistor and the lower the ADC voltage will be.


I like the general trend.

The more one thinks about a problem, the simpler it should get.
Luckily, the production tests and dummy load boards aren\'t a rush to
get done.

The problem is a bit on the squishy side anyway, ISTM. It\'s framed as an
airflow measurement, when what you actually care about is whether the
boards in the crate get adequate cooling.

Air flow is one ingredient, but both it and its effects will change in
some dimly-known way, depending on the boards that get put in the crate,
how the dissipation is distributed, the ambient conditions, junk piled
on top, dust inside, and so on and so forth.

Sure, but it helps to know that, if the fans are cranked all the way
uo, each board will get a guarenteed amount of air, namely 200 LFPM
over its surface.

I might put an air flow sensor on every board always, to flag the
various conditions you have named, although each will have temperature
sensors too. Spme of the plugin boards could dissipate 200 watts.

So although it would be nice for datasheet purposes, even a
super-accurate, unambiguous measurement of airflow at one position
wouldn\'t make the cooling that much easier to calculate accurately.

So abandoning hot wires, propellers, and so on, in favor of a
measurement of actual board cooling, seems to be at least as valuable.
(You can use some simple approximation to back out an airflow number for
the datasheet.)

So that\'s all pretty sensible, I think.

As the National Semi Temperature Measurement Handbook (2007) says, \"For
sensors in plastic packages like TO-92, SO-8, and SOT-23, the leads
provide the dominant thermal path. Therefore, a board-mounted IC sensor
will do a fine job of measuring the temperature of the circuit
board (especially the traces to which the leads are soldered).\"

I\'d spec that the assemblers keep the leads max length and put tiny
pads and traces on the board. The leads can be half an inch long and
are probably kovar, a terrible thermal conductor. I need to do the
math on that, or some measurements.

That\'s also true for transients, because thermal diffusion in plastic is
almost as poor as its thermal conduction. (The thermal diffusivity of
copper wire is about 6e-5 m**2 s, vs. 2e-7 or so for plastic, so roughly
300x.)

We can wait a minute or two to let things stabilize when we do the
per-slot air flow measurement, at production test of the boxes. The
boards themselves would be running at essentially zero power then.

So as long as you don\'t expect the thermal transient to actually be an
exponential, some sort of calibration like that should work OK.

OTOH since it\'s the board you\'ll be measuring anyway, you could just use
an I2C temperature sensor, and heat that with a nearby resistor. Our
fave is the Sensirion SHTC3, which has a very nice humidity sensor as
well--great for dew point estimation.

I have a separate use for the air flow sensor, in a case where our
board could be in someone else\'s crate and the surface flow direction
is not known. Flow measurement would be a sales feature there.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

 

[Phil Hobbs]

On 2023-06-14 10:33, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 08:24:54 -0400, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2023-06-13 22:18, John Larkin wrote:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/zppy7en9noljcfdo0qyv6/Darl_Flow_Sensor_1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=v7jk899m8l1jxz91r05lj6byx

(I hope that link works)

The darlington is a TO-92 sticking up from the PCB into the air
stream.

The idea is to turn on the mosfet for a while to heat up the
darlington, then turn it off and take a few measurements as it cools
down. A few points should be enough to calculate the cool-off time
constant. The thermal tau should drop by about 2:1 from zero air
flow to 200 LFPM.

This is even simpler:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1c779s23si0q6ly4ssu72/Darl_Air_Flow_Sensor_DC1.jpg?dl=0&rlkey=75logvs33gcon8xzmtfpmvf7e

We\'d have to turn off the fans and make a baseline ADC measurement
to use as the zero-flow point, which we could do. The more air flow,
the cooler the transistor and the lower the ADC voltage will be.


I like the general trend.

The more one thinks about a problem, the simpler it should get.
Luckily, the production tests and dummy load boards aren\'t a rush to
get done.


The problem is a bit on the squishy side anyway, ISTM. It\'s framed as an
airflow measurement, when what you actually care about is whether the
boards in the crate get adequate cooling.

Air flow is one ingredient, but both it and its effects will change in
some dimly-known way, depending on the boards that get put in the crate,
how the dissipation is distributed, the ambient conditions, junk piled
on top, dust inside, and so on and so forth.

Sure, but it helps to know that, if the fans are cranked all the way
uo, each board will get a guarenteed amount of air, namely 200 LFPM
over its surface.

I might put an air flow sensor on every board always, to flag the
various conditions you have named, although each will have temperature
sensors too. Spme of the plugin boards could dissipate 200 watts.


So although it would be nice for datasheet purposes, even a
super-accurate, unambiguous measurement of airflow at one position
wouldn\'t make the cooling that much easier to calculate accurately.

So abandoning hot wires, propellers, and so on, in favor of a
measurement of actual board cooling, seems to be at least as valuable.
(You can use some simple approximation to back out an airflow number for
the datasheet.)

So that\'s all pretty sensible, I think.

As the National Semi Temperature Measurement Handbook (2007) says, \"For
sensors in plastic packages like TO-92, SO-8, and SOT-23, the leads
provide the dominant thermal path. Therefore, a board-mounted IC sensor
will do a fine job of measuring the temperature of the circuit
board (especially the traces to which the leads are soldered).\"

I\'d spec that the assemblers keep the leads max length and put tiny
pads and traces on the board. The leads can be half an inch long and
are probably kovar, a terrible thermal conductor. I need to do the
math on that, or some measurements.

Nah, Kovar is for glass-metal seals. TO92s are all tin-plated
copper--take a look at the cut-off ends. You can also find out right
quick with a magnet.

That\'s also true for transients, because thermal diffusion in plastic is
almost as poor as its thermal conduction. (The thermal diffusivity of
copper wire is about 6e-5 m**2 s, vs. 2e-7 or so for plastic, so roughly
300x.)

We can wait a minute or two to let things stabilize when we do the
per-slot air flow measurement, at production test of the boxes. The
boards themselves would be running at essentially zero power then.

Sure. My point is that the coupling between the plastic package and the
air flow is the pits, and doing it as a transient doesn\'t make it a
great deal better. A typical way of localizing thermal measurements is
to use AC at a frequency that can\'t diffuse as far as the board, but
then it won\'t make it to the surface of the plastic either.

Of course you\'ve got as long as you like to do the measurement, which
certainly helps.

So as long as you don\'t expect the thermal transient to actually be an
exponential, some sort of calibration like that should work OK.

OTOH since it\'s the board you\'ll be measuring anyway, you could just use
an I2C temperature sensor, and heat that with a nearby resistor. Our
fave is the Sensirion SHTC3, which has a very nice humidity sensor as
well--great for dew point estimation.

I have a separate use for the air flow sensor, in a case where our
board could be in someone else\'s crate and the surface flow direction
is not known. Flow measurement would be a sales feature there.

As long as what you\'re measuring is actually board cooling, you can put
an approximate fpm number on it based on some lab correlation. Worse
things than that are done every day.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com