J
Jonathan Bromley
Guest
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 02:14:20 -0800,
GilGr <gil.greenstein@gmail.com> wrote:
The @(*) form looks very similar to attribute syntax
(*attribute...*) and so it's probably best to avoid it,
so that you have absolutely no risk of falling foul
of any bizarre ambiguities. But I've used it many
times without trouble.
I can't see any objection to @*, though.
--
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services
Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK
jonathan.bromley@MYCOMPANY.com
http://www.MYCOMPANY.com
The contents of this message may contain personal views which
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.
GilGr <gil.greenstein@gmail.com> wrote:
They are two alternative forms of exactly the same thing.I was told there is a difference between the 2, "always @*" and
"always @(*)", and I'm trying to understand, since it doesn't sound
right to me.
I'm using synopsys VCS, can it have a problem like this?
The @(*) form looks very similar to attribute syntax
(*attribute...*) and so it's probably best to avoid it,
so that you have absolutely no risk of falling foul
of any bizarre ambiguities. But I've used it many
times without trouble.
I can't see any objection to @*, though.
--
Jonathan Bromley, Consultant
DOULOS - Developing Design Know-how
VHDL * Verilog * SystemC * e * Perl * Tcl/Tk * Project Services
Doulos Ltd., 22 Market Place, Ringwood, BH24 1AW, UK
jonathan.bromley@MYCOMPANY.com
http://www.MYCOMPANY.com
The contents of this message may contain personal views which
are not the views of Doulos Ltd., unless specifically stated.