Always 30 years off...

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

Hehehe..

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

<https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300067-the-navy-just-patented-a-
compact-fusion-reactor-but-will-it-work>

<https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/compact-fusion.html>

So... set up 100 of them on a slab and how many does it take... to
match a steam turbine...

How many bowls of Total does it take to get the fiber in one bowl of
Colon Blow? (some will miss that reference)

 

[Jeff Liebermann]

On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 11:25:06 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

How many bowls of Total does it take to get the fiber in one bowl of
Colon Blow? (some will miss that reference)

A bowl of Total cereal has only about 10% of the recommended daily
fiber requirement:
<https://www.livestrong.com/article/253084-whole-grain-total-cereal-nutrition/>
A 30 g serving of Total whole-grain cereal has 100 calories
and 2 g protein. It has only 0.5 g fat and no unhealthy
saturated or trans fat. The cereal has 23 g total carbohydrates
with 5 g sugar and 10 percent of the daily value for dietary fiber.

I missed the Colon Blow Cereal reference, but Google found it for me:
<https://www.google.com/search?q=colon+blow+cereal&tbm=isch>
No clue on the actual fiber content.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

 

[John Robertson]

On 2019/11/01 4:25 a.m., DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

Hehehe..

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300067-the-navy-just-patented-a-
compact-fusion-reactor-but-will-it-work

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/compact-fusion.html

So... set up 100 of them on a slab and how many does it take... to
match a steam turbine...

How many bowls of Total does it take to get the fiber in one bowl of
Colon Blow? (some will miss that reference)

That was a low blow...

John ;-#)#

 

[Phil Allison]

DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

--------------------------------------

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

Hehehe..

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300067-the-navy-just-patented-a-
compact-fusion-reactor-but-will-it-work

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/compact-fusion.html

So... set up 100 of them on a slab and how many does it take... to
match a steam turbine...

** Well, I hate to be the one to tell you this - but ...

Nuke reactors do NOT produce electricity.

Nearly all make high temp steam to drive turbines.

Which in turn spin a bloody great 3-ph alternator, phase locked to the grid.

Amazing stuff.

Works for coal, oil, fission and fusion power.

Gas fuels giant jet engines for the same job.

See my post about the RR Avon from 1946.



...... Phil

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 7:25:12 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

Hehehe..

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300067-the-navy-just-patented-a-
compact-fusion-reactor-but-will-it-work

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/compact-fusion.html

So... set up 100 of them on a slab and how many does it take... to
match a steam turbine...

Let us know when they have even ONE working. Until then, it's still the old
30 years off.

 

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in
news:218ee4b2-6aed-4f42-9724-fa8f0a276235@googlegroups.com:

DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

--------------------------------------

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

Hehehe..

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300067-the-navy-just-patented
-a- compact-fusion-reactor-but-will-it-work

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/compact-fusion.html


So... set up 100 of them on a slab and how many does it
take... to
match a steam turbine...


** Well, I hate to be the one to tell you this - but ...

Nuke reactors do NOT produce electricity.

Pretty stupid. Coal fired boilers do not produce electricity
either, ya dope.


> Nearly all make high temp steam to drive turbines.

No... Really? None of us here in this scientific group knew that,
Philoniuous Punk.

We thought they were for tanning.

Which in turn spin a bloody great 3-ph alternator, phase locked to
the grid.

No sherk, Shitlock.

> Amazing stuff.

Amazing that you can nearly form a sentence.

> Works for coal, oil, fission and fusion power.

Yeah. Your primer intelligence level is even beneath a 7 year old
second grader.

Gas fuels giant jet engines for the same job.

Yep. A compact Fusion reactor knows how to make steam too.
Maybe you should have read the article instead of your lame
completely uneducated, cursory glance, Donald J. Trump like attitude.

> See my post about the RR Avon from 1946.

Nope. Not interested in anything you wrote. Not after seeing this
stupid shit.

 

[Phil Allison]

DecadentLinux.. Fucking CUNTHEAD MORON

----------------------------------------

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/compact-fusion.html


So... set up 100 of them on a slab and how many does it
take... to
match a steam turbine...


** Well, I hate to be the one to tell you this - but ...

Nuke reactors do NOT produce electricity.


Pretty stupid.

** False arguments - over and fucking over.

Nearly all make high temp steam to drive turbines.

No... Really?

** False argument.

Which in turn spin a bloody great 3-ph alternator, phase locked to
the grid.

No sherk, Shitlock.

** Offensive garbage posing as an argument.

Amazing stuff.

Amazing that you can nearly form a sentence.

** Ad hominem attack = no argument.

Works for coal, oil, fission and fusion power.

Yeah.

** Must be one of them rocket scientist types...

Gas fuels giant jet engines for the same job.

Yep. A compact Fusion reactor knows how to make steam too.

** Anyone hear a bad echo in here ?

( Bet that one flies right over this demented chimp's pointy head )

See my post about the RR Avon from 1946.

Nope.

** Don't go ahead, make my day anyway.

Fools like DL can only see the literal meaning of anything.

Wonder if he stands right in the middle of pedestrian crossinsg if the WALK light changes ???

Good at counting cards too maybe ??



..... Phil

 

[Mike Coon]

In article <02364d73-e6be-4df5-900f-9c74a2e12f98@googlegroups.com>,
trader4@optonline.net says...

Let us know when they have even ONE working. Until then, it's still
the old
30 years off.

I thought it was 50 years. Perhaps someone got optimistic since then...

Mike.

 

[Phil Allison]

Mike Coon wrote:

------------------

30 years off.

I thought it was 50 years. Perhaps someone got optimistic since then...

** The first practical powered aircraft were flying in 1904, IIRC.

The first practical, stable helicopter took until 1946.

And these are simple machines needing no new technology.

Nuclear fission was pretty much mastered in a few years, using room temp materials.

Building a stable, mini-sun here on earth is just taking a tad longer.

Be patient, not nasty.


...... Phil

 

Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote in news:92379b6f-a7e8-4da9-
9e80-91a12082a66c@googlegroups.com:

Be patient, not nasty.

Take your own advice, fuckhead. While you are being patient, try
taking a swan dive from a tall bridge, Phil.

Because right now, you are the nastiest fuck around, right next to
Donald J. Trump.

 

[Mike Coon]

In article <qph4mi$1fil$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org says...

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

That has reminded me that an experimental fusion reactor "JET" (Joint
European Torus) was not far from here ("close"?). When they were about
to make it permanently radioactive (I understand) they held open days in
June 1991 and I went along to have a look at it.

The heavy engineering was very impressive. It was built close to a power
station so that they could draw huge currents, but nevertheless there
were several input energy storage devices, including a large flywheel.

I still have, being a squirrel hybrid, the full colour brochure and even
more detailed additional specification sheets and site map...

Mike.

 

Mike Coon <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> wrote in
news:MPG.3828adce94448ec688@news.plus.net:

In article <qph4mi$1fil$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org says...

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

That has reminded me that an experimental fusion reactor "JET"
(Joint European Torus) was not far from here ("close"?). When they
were about to make it permanently radioactive (I understand) they
held open days in June 1991 and I went along to have a look at it.

The heavy engineering was very impressive. It was built close to a
power station so that they could draw huge currents, but
nevertheless there were several input energy storage devices,
including a large flywheel.

I still have, being a squirrel hybrid, the full colour brochure
and even more detailed additional specification sheets and site
map...

Mike.

I uploaded a hi res "Mr. Fusion" to my pic folder... And a
tokomak...

Sort by date... all the ones uploaded today have them and spiders
too!

<http://www.mediafire.com/folder/xfb6s1pae0xkc/FavPics>

 

On Friday, November 1, 2019 at 7:25:12 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence..org wrote:

Well, they are finally going to make a "Mr. Fusion".

Hehehe..

No, really... a compact fusion reactor may be close.

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/300067-the-navy-just-patented-a-
compact-fusion-reactor-but-will-it-work

Story changed to Navy filed a patent application. No patent has been awarded. Inventor is well-known lunatic clearly out his league in both education and experience. His PhD is in aerospace and mechanical engineering, not exactly fields of study leading to fundamental scientific breakthroughs. Then the stuff about being vouched for by a lab CTO is similar hot air. I am familiar with one case where the CTO biography put him forward as a child prodigy on the basis of his fascination with doorbells when he was younger. His adult capabilities had not progressed much beyond that. Generally anything coming out of the Navy has zero credibility.

 

DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in news:qpp3vh$19en$1
@gioia.aioe.org:

I uploaded a hi res "Mr. Fusion" to my pic folder... And a
tokomak...

Sort by date... all the ones uploaded today have them and spiders
too!

http://www.mediafire.com/folder/xfb6s1pae0xkc/FavPics

Made some new black hole dark matter web particle physics crop circle
stuff uploads today. The hi res BH animated gif is real cool.