A Typical Fraud Trying To Fake A Tech Background

B

Bret Cahill

Guest
It ain't gonna work.

Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.

In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.
That's the most typical example of a fraud trying to fake a tech
background.

Now you've convinced everyone. You're a fraud trying to fake a
background
in thermo.


Bret Cahill
 
Bret Cahill wrote:
It ain't gonna work.

Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.

In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.

That's the most typical example of a fraud trying to fake a tech
background.

Now you've convinced everyone. You're a fraud trying to fake a
background
in thermo.


Bret Cahill
Whom are you replying to?
 
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:50:20 GMT, Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com>
wrote:

Bret Cahill wrote:
It ain't gonna work.

Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.

In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.

That's the most typical example of a fraud trying to fake a tech
background.

Now you've convinced everyone. You're a fraud trying to fake a
background
in thermo.


Bret Cahill



Whom are you replying to?
He's just yacking himself off. The poseur is afraid to leave
attributions and quote properly. Best to ignore the groups new pool
steno.
 
Bret Cahill wrote:

Just wait and watch. Just as a criminal always returns to the scene
of a crime a dunce will always return to claim his own poop.

The stupidity of a dunce is incredible.


Bret Cahill
You shouldn't put yourself down like that Cahill... show a bit of
pride and stand up for yourself!
 
It ain't gonna work.

Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.

In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.

That's the most typical example of a fraud trying to fake a tech
background.

Now you've convinced everyone. �You're a fraud trying to fake a
background
in thermo.

Bret Cahill

� �Whom are you replying to?
Just wait and watch. Just as a criminal always returns to the scene
of a crime a dunce will always return to claim his own poop.

The stupidity of a dunce is incredible.


Bret Cahill
 
It ain't gonna work.
Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.

In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.
The passage above is 3 acronyms and two equations short of being
"robust" that is, well crafted enough to impress someone with an IQ
above single digits.

I studied scams for 15 years in Florida and believe you me, a good 83%
of Florida scammers are more sophisticated than the sorry example
above.


Bret Cahill


www.scamotology.org
 
On Jan 3, 3:16 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
It ain't gonna work.
Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.
In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.

The passage above is 3 acronyms and two equations short of being
"robust" that is, well crafted enough to impress someone with an IQ
above single digits.
Perhaps, but it has damned little to do with thermodynamics or fields.

This is a technology question, the answer to which will be found for
any given device by comparing its power consumption with the catalog
data of your commercial heat sinks. Power dissipation will depend on
operating and ambient temperatures, cooling fans, humidity, and
thermal coupling efficiency.

Restrictions on operating conditions will apply.

I studied scams for 15 years in Florida and believe you me, a good 83%
of Florida scammers are more sophisticated than the sorry example
above.

Bret Cahill

www.scamotology.org
No such web site.
"Sorry, 'www.scamotology.org' does not exist or is not available."
Try www.scatology.org

They will let you know whether you are full of bullshit, horseshit,
ratshit, or if you are just chickenshit.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
 
Bret Cahill wrote:
It ain't gonna work.
Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.

In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.

The passage above is 3 acronyms and two equations short of being
"robust" that is, well crafted enough to impress someone with an IQ
above single digits.

I studied scams for 15 years in Florida and believe you me, a good 83%
of Florida scammers are more sophisticated than the sorry example
above.


Bret Cahill


www.scamotology.org
To whom are you replying?
 
On Jan 3, 7:28 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
It ain't gonna work.
Certainly not from a dunce who has never studied thermodynamics or
fields.
In line with that, ISTR that a while ago I posed a rather simple
thermodynamic problem which asked for, as a solution, the identification
of a COTS heat sink which would keep the junction temperature of the
semiconductor device to which it was attached at or below its absolute
maximum temperature while dissipating its maximum rated power.

That's the most typical example of a fraud trying to fake a tech
background.

Now you've convinced everyone.  You're a fraud trying to fake a
background
in thermo.

Bret Cahill
http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Wireless_Transmission_of_Electricity
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top