Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
But few have their own IR light built in.Most also work with Infrared light as well.
light a 10 watt fluro (energy saver) provides a very good clear colourVery few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
Most also work with Infrared light as well.
But few have their own IR light built in.
I think that CCD sensors like my tape sony Video camera need little
Sigh. It is all electromagnetic radiation. just that some cams respondOn Wed, 25 May 2011 13:57:03 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image. Most also work with Infrared
light as well.
Which would be useless in daylight then?Pretzl wrote
terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
Most also work with Infrared light as well.
But few have their own IR light built in.
I think that CCD sensors like my tape sony Video camera
need little light a 10 watt fluro (energy saver) provides a
very good clear colour face/body image at 2 metres outside.
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.My camera has inbuilt night vision again not effective above 2 metres
That last is just plain wrong, you have it backwards.and in a sort of black and white image only. CMOS sensors do offer
even lower light levels resulting in clearer pictures than CCD do and
are the main sensor type used in latest DVD quality video cameras
Yes, but the swans arent the best security cameras around.(IMO most certainly superior image qualiy and cheaper than Swan in all respects).
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.My main problem with my CCD video cam is the street light gives
me the front number plate number the rear if lit is whited out as
the video cam has (automatic) adjusted for low light capture
Nope, not with automatic aperture cameras.Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
Which would be useless in daylight then?
Only with supplementary lighting.The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
rubbish compared what one can get from a video cam?Rod Speed wrote:
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
The results I've seen from "security camera" images are complete
http://tinyurl.com/3mac75rterryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
Which would be useless in daylight then?
Nope, not with automatic aperture cameras.
You can buy Automatic Apertures to fit cameras,
The set-up I use via a old Sony Video cam is for outside and just havePetzl wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2011 13:57:03 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image. Most also work with Infrared
light as well.
Sigh. It is all electromagnetic radiation. just that some cams respond
better in that area.
Wrong, as always.Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
Most also work with Infrared light as well.
But few have their own IR light built in.
I think that CCD sensors like my tape sony Video camera
need little light a 10 watt fluro (energy saver) provides a
very good clear colour face/body image at 2 metres outside.
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
My camera has inbuilt night vision again not effective above 2 metres
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
and in a sort of black and white image only. CMOS sensors do offer
even lower light levels resulting in clearer pictures than CCD do and
are the main sensor type used in latest DVD quality video cameras
That last is just plain wrong, you have it backwards.
(IMO most certainly superior image qualiy and cheaper than Swan in all respects).
Yes, but the swans arent the best security cameras around.
My main problem with my CCD video cam is the street light gives
me the front number plate number the rear if lit is whited out as
the video cam has (automatic) adjusted for low light capture
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
Only because you have only seen the results from shit security cameras.terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
The results I've seen from "security camera" images are complete
rubbish compared what one can get from a video cam?
You dont need to with the better cameras, they have it already.Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
Which would be useless in daylight then?
Nope, not with automatic aperture cameras.
You can buy Automatic Apertures to fit cameras,
http://tinyurl.com/3mac75r
Utterly mangled all over again.the video cameras change capture speed. Unless lighting is sufficient
in both cases, the image quality determinates accordingly.
What I said.For night time "silent/spying" surveillance (which I dont want) either the
use of infrared lighting (which can be bought) http://tinyurl.com/4298kpz
Or the use of special "night cameras"
are inferior to what I already get and not cheap (not seen any resultsPretzl wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Pretzl wrote
Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> wrote
A Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
What's wrong with using a DVD digital Video Camera as a security camera?
Doesnt work very well at all at night.
Very few do unless you provide supplementary lighting.
The more light the better the image.
Thats not true with the best low light cameras.
Which would be useless in daylight then?
Nope, not with automatic aperture cameras.
You can buy Automatic Apertures to fit cameras,
http://tinyurl.com/3mac75r
You dont need to with the better cameras, they have it already.
I have looked at some but the images I have seen from these cameras
what your neighbors do. An advantage with the software is I can maskthe video cameras change capture speed. Unless lighting is sufficient
in both cases, the image quality is determined accordingly to light availability.
Utterly mangled all over again.
For night time "silent/spying" surveillance (which I dont want) either the
use of infrared lighting (which can be bought) http://tinyurl.com/4298kpz
Or the use of special "night cameras"
What I said.
I also believe there are laws, council regulations about recording
petzlPretzl wrote
terryc <newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
The results I've seen from "security camera" images are complete
rubbish compared what one can get from a video cam?
Only because you have only seen the results from shit security cameras.
Interested if you could provide a link to a good security image
Like anything, the early ones were crap, but now quality is just aOn Thu, 26 May 2011 10:08:59 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
The results I've seen from "security camera" images are complete
rubbish compared what one can get from a video cam?
Still not seen a "security camera" that takes a better image than aPetzl wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:08:59 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
The results I've seen from "security camera" images are complete
rubbish compared what one can get from a video cam?
Like anything, the early ones were crap, but now quality is just a
function of how much money you have.
After what has been covered, I am very interested to see what is around as an alternative to the type of Swann SecurityA Security Camera & DVR web site with some incredible prices.
Did you ever come across a web site that offers deals that seem so good, you didn't want to tell anyone else about it,
as you wanted to keep it all to yourself?
You might not have, but I have. Try searching for a few and their sampleOn Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:00 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Petzl wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:08:59 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
The results I've seen from "security camera" images are complete
rubbish compared what one can get from a video cam?
Like anything, the early ones were crap, but now quality is just a
function of how much money you have.
Still not seen a "security camera" that takes a better image than a
Video cam
I have! Many seem reluctant to show samplesPetzl wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:00 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Petzl wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:08:59 +1000, terryc
newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:
Rod Speed wrote:
The best security cameras do a hell of a lot better than that.
Only with supplementary lighting.
The results I've seen from "security camera" images are complete
rubbish compared what one can get from a video cam?
Like anything, the early ones were crap, but now quality is just a
function of how much money you have.
Still not seen a "security camera" that takes a better image than a
Video cam
You might not have, but I have. Try searching for a few and their sample
images.