A Life, a Person, or Not?...

[Ricky]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyuZ5xfT6s&ab_channel=TheDallasMorningNews

Can it be both, that a fetus is a person who has the right to life, but not the right to use the HOV lanes? Sort of a substandard life, I guess, only earning some rights and not others?

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[bitrex]

On 7/12/2022 12:15 AM, Ricky wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyuZ5xfT6s&ab_channel=TheDallasMorningNews

Can it be both, that a fetus is a person who has the right to life, but not the right to use the HOV lanes? Sort of a substandard life, I guess, only earning some rights and not others?

Supreme Court hasn\'t ruled on whether a fetus is a person. And AFAIK the
only way the Republicans could in the foreseeable future pass a
nationwide ban is if they frame the ban in those terms and the SC agrees
that it is, in which case Congress has broad powers to pass laws to make
what would then be considered murder illegal to whatever degree they see
fit.

Even in that case I expect she\'d still get a ticket. Laws in America are
designed to keep the powerful powerful and make sure anyone who\'s not
that stays kicked to the curb and in line, they\'re not designed to be
logically consistent.

 

[Judge Dredd]

Google Groups idiot post...

--
Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5dc9:0:b0:319:6117:29c8 with SMTP id e9-20020ac85dc9000000b00319611729c8mr16583695qtx.464.1657599307465;
Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:f8f:0:b0:31c:bd9f:31ce with SMTP id
137-20020a810f8f000000b0031cbd9f31cemr23162240ywp.347.1657599307129; Mon, 11
Jul 2022 21:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Path: not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2001:5b0:48d7:8fb8:142e:33de:c176:cd2d;
posting-account=I-_H_woAAAA9zzro6crtEpUAyIvzd19b
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:5b0:48d7:8fb8:142e:33de:c176:cd2d
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <936ea426-4abd-4a3e-ab39-61de3a110859n@googlegroups.com
Subject: A Life, a Person, or Not?
From: Ricky <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 04:15:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"UTF-8\"
X-Received-Bytes: 1508

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyuZ5xfT6s&ab_channel=TheDallasMorningNews

Can it be both, that a fetus is a person who has the right to life, but not the right to use the HOV lanes? Sort of a substandard life, I guess, only earning some rights and not others?

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[John Doe]

Off-topic troll...

--
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

Path: not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: A Life, a Person, or Not?
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <936ea426-4abd-4a3e-ab39-61de3a110859n@googlegroups.com
From: bitrex <user@example.net
In-Reply-To: <936ea426-4abd-4a3e-ab39-61de3a110859n@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <zYezK.354920$ssF.65263@fx14.iad
X-Complaints-To: abuse@frugalusenet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 13:48:15 UTC
Organization: frugalusenet - www.frugalusenet.com
Bytes: 1658
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:48:15 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1797

On 7/12/2022 12:15 AM, Ricky wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyuZ5xfT6s&ab_channel=TheDallasMorningNews

Can it be both, that a fetus is a person who has the right to life, but not the right to use the HOV lanes? Sort of a substandard life, I guess, only earning some rights and not others?


Supreme Court hasn\'t ruled on whether a fetus is a person. And AFAIK the
only way the Republicans could in the foreseeable future pass a
nationwide ban is if they frame the ban in those terms and the SC agrees
that it is, in which case Congress has broad powers to pass laws to make
what would then be considered murder illegal to whatever degree they see
fit.

Even in that case I expect she\'d still get a ticket. Laws in America are
designed to keep the powerful powerful and make sure anyone who\'s not
that stays kicked to the curb and in line, they\'re not designed to be
logically consistent.

 

[Edward Hernandez]

See also these John Doe troll nym-shift names:

John Doe <always.look@message.header>
John <look@post.header>
Judge Dredd <always.look@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Mother\" <always.see@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Father\" <always.see@post.header>

John Doe troll claiming it has never nym-shifted on Usenet:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165248158300

In message-id <t6nt3e$7bp$3@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165357273000) posted Thu, 26 May 2022
12:50:54 -0000 (UTC) John Dope stated:

Always Wrong, the utterly foulmouthed group idiot, adding absolutely
NOTHING but insults to this thread, as usual...

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 72.8% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope has posted at
least 3166 articles to USENET. Of which 176 have been pure insults and
2129 have been John Dope \"troll format\" postings.

The Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless Troll Doe has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:47:02 GMT in
message-id <GPfzK.754858$yKw9.558253@usenetxs.com>.

5d/J7iyX7Tmc

 

[Edward Hernandez]

See also these John Doe troll nym-shift names:

John Doe <always.look@message.header>
John <look@post.header>
Judge Dredd <always.look@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Mother\" <always.see@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Father\" <always.see@post.header>

John Doe troll claiming it has never nym-shifted on Usenet:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165248158300

Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 72.8% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 3166 articles to USENET. Of which 176 have been pure insults and
2129 have been Troll Doe \"troll format\" postings.

The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:47:07 GMT in message-id
<LPfzK.429303$Zth9.309222@usenetxs.com>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that Troll Doe does not even follow
the rules it uses to troll other posters.

14SODoJuEG91

 

[Lasse Langwadt Christensen]

tirsdag den 12. juli 2022 kl. 15.48.22 UTC+2 skrev bitrex:

On 7/12/2022 12:15 AM, Ricky wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyuZ5xfT6s&ab_channel=TheDallasMorningNews

Can it be both, that a fetus is a person who has the right to life, but not the right to use the HOV lanes? Sort of a substandard life, I guess, only earning some rights and not others?

Supreme Court hasn\'t ruled on whether a fetus is a person. And AFAIK the
only way the Republicans could in the foreseeable future pass a
nationwide ban is if they frame the ban in those terms and the SC agrees
that it is, in which case Congress has broad powers to pass laws to make
what would then be considered murder illegal to whatever degree they see
fit.

Even in that case I expect she\'d still get a ticket. Laws in America are
designed to keep the powerful powerful and make sure anyone who\'s not
that stays kicked to the curb and in line, they\'re not designed to be
logically consistent.

maybe just an internet story, but apperently some did win the case that
she had the right to use the HOV and was then promptly fined for failing
to have her child in and approved childseat

 

[Ricky]

On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 11:22:39 AM UTC-4, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:

tirsdag den 12. juli 2022 kl. 15.48.22 UTC+2 skrev bitrex:
On 7/12/2022 12:15 AM, Ricky wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyuZ5xfT6s&ab_channel=TheDallasMorningNews

Can it be both, that a fetus is a person who has the right to life, but not the right to use the HOV lanes? Sort of a substandard life, I guess, only earning some rights and not others?

Supreme Court hasn\'t ruled on whether a fetus is a person. And AFAIK the
only way the Republicans could in the foreseeable future pass a
nationwide ban is if they frame the ban in those terms and the SC agrees
that it is, in which case Congress has broad powers to pass laws to make
what would then be considered murder illegal to whatever degree they see
fit.

Even in that case I expect she\'d still get a ticket. Laws in America are
designed to keep the powerful powerful and make sure anyone who\'s not
that stays kicked to the curb and in line, they\'re not designed to be
logically consistent.
maybe just an internet story, but apperently some did win the case that
she had the right to use the HOV and was then promptly fined for failing
to have her child in and approved childseat

Yeah, right... do you really believe that?

They usually list the approved ages on child seats since there are a number of different ones for different ages. If there are no seats available for children under 0 years of age, that isn\'t the parents fault. The fetus is already in a very well protected environment.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Edward Hernandez]

See also these John Doe troll nym-shift names:

John Doe <always.look@message.header>
John <look@post.header>
Judge Dredd <always.look@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Mother\" <always.see@post.header>
\"Edward\'s Father\" <always.see@post.header>

John Doe troll claiming it has never nym-shifted on Usenet:
http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165248158300

Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
<svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
(http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
except insults to this group.

Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe\'s post ratio
to USENET (**) has been 72.9% of its posts contributing \"nothing except
insults\" to USENET.

** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
least 3174 articles to USENET. Of which 176 have been pure insults and
2137 have been Troll Doe \"troll format\" postings.

The John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...

And the John Dope troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...

And yet, the clueless John Dope troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Wed, 13 Jul 2022 03:33:41 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<taleel$29e8j$1@dont-email.me>).

NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.

This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that Troll Doe does not even follow
the rules it uses to troll other posters.

53ZiTb5j4uWX

 

[boB]

On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:50:30 -0700 (PDT), Ricky
<gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 11:22:39 AM UTC-4, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:
tirsdag den 12. juli 2022 kl. 15.48.22 UTC+2 skrev bitrex:
On 7/12/2022 12:15 AM, Ricky wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocyuZ5xfT6s&ab_channel=TheDallasMorningNews

Can it be both, that a fetus is a person who has the right to life, but not the right to use the HOV lanes? Sort of a substandard life, I guess, only earning some rights and not others?

Supreme Court hasn\'t ruled on whether a fetus is a person. And AFAIK the
only way the Republicans could in the foreseeable future pass a
nationwide ban is if they frame the ban in those terms and the SC agrees
that it is, in which case Congress has broad powers to pass laws to make
what would then be considered murder illegal to whatever degree they see
fit.

Even in that case I expect she\'d still get a ticket. Laws in America are
designed to keep the powerful powerful and make sure anyone who\'s not
that stays kicked to the curb and in line, they\'re not designed to be
logically consistent.
maybe just an internet story, but apperently some did win the case that
she had the right to use the HOV and was then promptly fined for failing
to have her child in and approved childseat

Yeah, right... do you really believe that?

They usually list the approved ages on child seats since there are a number of different ones for different ages. If there are no seats available for children under 0 years of age, that isn\'t the parents fault. The fetus is already in a very well protected environment.

I heard about this.... I hope she wins.