10% THD?

Guest
Are they serious?

http://av.jvc.com/product.jsp?modelId=MODL027647&pathId=5&page=2
"100 watts per channel, 8 ohms at 1kHz, with 10% THD"

10% THD sounds like a lot.

Michael
 
mrdarrett@gmail.com wrote:

Are they serious?

http://av.jvc.com/product.jsp?modelId=MODL027647&pathId=5&page=2
"100 watts per channel, 8 ohms at 1kHz, with 10% THD"

10% THD sounds like a lot.
Pretty standard figure for quoting watts for in car entertainment
equipment.

Never previously seen it used for any home audio though. It's probably ~
60-70W at some acceptable THD figure.

Graham
 
mrdarrett@gmail.com wrote:

On Apr 8, 8:44 pm, BobG <bobgard...@aol.com> wrote:
But the waveform that gets clipped and produces the 10% distortion
probably occurs less than 1% of the time... when the car crashes or
the tank cannon fires, etc, so you probably cant tell if the KaBoom!
is distorted or not... 99.9% of people have never heard a live tank
cannon at a range of less than several miles anyway.

Well, for nearly the same price ($130 at Wal-Mart), you can get this
instead:

http://www.sherwoodusa.com/prod_rd6500.html

"100 Watts per Channel x 2 in Stereo Mode with less than 0.9% THD,
40 Hz-20 kHz, 6 Ohms"

The THD for a range 40Hz-20kHz should be greater (summed) than the THD
for a single frequency (1 kHz in the JVC above), right?
THD typically increases with frequency (due to falling open-loop gain) so
a 20kHz figure will be more than a 1 kHz figure.

Graham
 
mrdarrett@gmail.com wrote:
Are they serious?

http://av.jvc.com/product.jsp?modelId=MODL027647&pathId=5&page=2
"100 watts per channel, 8 ohms at 1kHz, with 10% THD"

10% THD sounds like a lot.

I have seen 2% THD described as sounding like a barrel of nails in a
cement mixer.


--
aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists

Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file
* drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic.

http://improve-usenet.org/index.html


Use any search engine other than Google till they stop polluting USENET
with porn and junk commercial SPAM
 
mrdarrett@gmail.com wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote:
BobG <bobgard...@aol.com> wrote:

But the waveform that gets clipped and produces the 10% distortion
probably occurs less than 1% of the time... when the car crashes or
the tank cannon fires, etc, so you probably cant tell if the KaBoom!
is distorted or not... 99.9% of people have never heard a live tank
cannon at a range of less than several miles anyway.

Well, for nearly the same price ($130 at Wal-Mart), you can get this
instead:

http://www.sherwoodusa.com/prod_rd6500.html

"100 Watts per Channel x 2 in Stereo Mode with less than 0.9% THD,
40 Hz-20 kHz, 6 Ohms"

The THD for a range 40Hz-20kHz should be greater (summed) than the THD
for a single frequency (1 kHz in the JVC above), right?

THD typically increases with frequency (due to falling open-loop gain) so
a 20kHz figure will be more than a 1 kHz figure.


And the THD should be higher at 4 or 6 ohms than at 8, right?
That would be normal.

Graham
 
BobG wrote:

But 'visible clipping' is
about 10%, and is surprisingly inaudible.
Absolute nonsense. You can easily see clipping on a sinewave on a scope at
less than 1% and it's CLEARLY audible due to the high harmonic content.

Graham
 
But the waveform that gets clipped and produces the 10% distortion
probably occurs less than 1% of the time... when the car crashes or
the tank cannon fires, etc, so you probably cant tell if the KaBoom!
is distorted or not... 99.9% of people have never heard a live tank
cannon at a range of less than several miles anyway.
 
On Apr 8, 8:44 pm, BobG <bobgard...@aol.com> wrote:
But the waveform that gets clipped and produces the 10% distortion
probably occurs less than 1% of the time... when the car crashes or
the tank cannon fires, etc, so you probably cant tell if the KaBoom!
is distorted or not... 99.9% of people have never heard a live tank
cannon at a range of less than several miles anyway.

Well, for nearly the same price ($130 at Wal-Mart), you can get this
instead:

http://www.sherwoodusa.com/prod_rd6500.html

"100 Watts per Channel x 2 in Stereo Mode with less than 0.9% THD,
40 Hz-20 kHz, 6 Ohms"

The THD for a range 40Hz-20kHz should be greater (summed) than the THD
for a single frequency (1 kHz in the JVC above), right?

Michael
 
On Apr 8, 8:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 8, 8:44 pm, BobG <bobgard...@aol.com> wrote:
But the waveform that gets clipped and produces the 10% distortion
probably occurs less than 1% of the time... when the car crashes or
the tank cannon fires, etc, so you probably cant tell if the KaBoom!
is distorted or not... 99.9% of people have never heard a live tank
cannon at a range of less than several miles anyway.

Well, for nearly the same price ($130 at Wal-Mart), you can get this
instead:

http://www.sherwoodusa.com/prod_rd6500.html

"100 Watts per Channel x 2 in Stereo Mode with less than 0.9% THD,
40 Hz-20 kHz, 6 Ohms"

The THD for a range 40Hz-20kHz should be greater (summed) than the THD
for a single frequency (1 kHz in the JVC above), right?

THD typically increases with frequency (due to falling open-loop gain) so
a 20kHz figure will be more than a 1 kHz figure.

Graham

And the THD should be higher at 4 or 6 ohms than at 8, right?

M
 
I dont think you can see the difference between 0.1% and 3% distortion
in a sine wave. Scope aint good enough. But 'visible clipping' is
about 10%, and is surprisingly inaudible. Try it yourself. Get a scope
and a cd player and a smallish amp and a speaker. View amp output on
scope. Turn up till you see visible clipping. Compare sound with
clipping to sound without clipping.
 
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:44:11 -0700, BobG wrote:

But the waveform that gets clipped and produces the 10% distortion
probably occurs less than 1% of the time... when the car crashes or the
tank cannon fires, etc, so you probably cant tell if the KaBoom! is
distorted or not... 99.9% of people have never heard a live tank cannon
at a range of less than several miles anyway.
I've heard 3-inch naval rifles from aboard the firing ship, and tank main
guns from about 200 yards. It's nothing like the prolonged, all-bass
boom you hear in most movies; the real thing is as flat and abrupt as a
slammed door. I suspect that the Hollywood sound-effects community spent
a lot of time developing something that would sound plausible without
driving their recording systems nuts.
 
On Apr 8, 9:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
BobG wrote:
But 'visible clipping' is
about 10%, and is surprisingly inaudible.

Absolute nonsense. You can easily see clipping on a sinewave on a scope at
less than 1% and it's CLEARLY audible due to the high harmonic content.

Graham

Perhaps you have better ears than the rest of us. ;-)

There's a cellphone ringtone that supposedly only teenagers can hear,
no one over thirty - so if they get a call, their parents/teachers are
none the wiser.

Michael
 
On Apr 9, 12:55�am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net>
wrote:
� �I have seen 2% THD described as sounding like a barrel of nails in a
cement mixer.
============================But in court, this would be objected to as hearsay. We have all heard
horrible distorted clipped hash coming from and amp, but was that .5%,
5%, or 50% THD we were hearing at the time? Anyone can hear a diff in
an AB comparison with a graphic EQ in and out, but few can characteris
it quantatatively and within about an octave. Unless they have a
couple decades experience in live sound reinforcement like me and a
couple of buddies. They could win a bet in a bar if you took in a
signal generator and a spectrum analyzer. Perfect pitch.
 
On Apr 9, 11:20 am, "Bob Eld" <nsmontas...@yahoo.com> wrote:
mrdarr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:8b5083e5-4d3e-4117-86d6-a3213396f804@s39g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

Are they serious?

http://av.jvc.com/product.jsp?modelId=MODL027647&pathId=5&page=2
"100 watts per channel, 8 ohms at 1kHz, with 10% THD"

10% THD sounds like a lot.

Michael

It is a lot. Most likely a misprint. Nobody in their right mind would spec.
an amplifier with that distortion nor would they rate an amplifier at its
clipping level as has been suggested.

Since getting less than one percent even less than 0.1% THD is trivial these
days with modern semiconductor circuitry it would seem that this spec sheet
is probably in error.

Most likely the printer or web master left out a decimal point and nobody
caught it. Call JVC and ask.

I downloaded the manual, and it also has 10% THD...
http://resources.jvc.com/Resources/00/00/90/LVT1507-001A.pdf

Support info:
http://support.jvc.com/consumer/support/index.jsp

I called their 800 number, and heard an amazingly distorted
recording. Maybe distortion is company policy? ;-)

I'll try e-mailing them (but won't hold my breath).

Well, if it does end up a mistake, this would be a pretty good
product...
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5301826

Thanks,

Michael
 
On Apr 9, 11:57 am, mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 9, 11:20 am, "Bob Eld" <nsmontas...@yahoo.com> wrote:



mrdarr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:8b5083e5-4d3e-4117-86d6-a3213396f804@s39g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

Are they serious?

http://av.jvc.com/product.jsp?modelId=MODL027647&pathId=5&page=2
"100 watts per channel, 8 ohms at 1kHz, with 10% THD"

10% THD sounds like a lot.

Michael

It is a lot. Most likely a misprint. Nobody in their right mind would spec.
an amplifier with that distortion nor would they rate an amplifier at its
clipping level as has been suggested.

Since getting less than one percent even less than 0.1% THD is trivial these
days with modern semiconductor circuitry it would seem that this spec sheet
is probably in error.

Most likely the printer or web master left out a decimal point and nobody
caught it. Call JVC and ask.

I downloaded the manual, and it also has 10% THD...http://resources.jvc.com/Resources/00/00/90/LVT1507-001A.pdf

Support info:http://support.jvc.com/consumer/support/index.jsp

I called their 800 number, and heard an amazingly distorted
recording. Maybe distortion is company policy? ;-)

I'll try e-mailing them (but won't hold my breath).

Well, if it does end up a mistake, this would be a pretty good
product...http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=5301826

Thanks,

Michael

I called them again (the phone lines were clear this time).

Confirmed that, yes, it is 10%. (Tech guy asked his supervisor).

okay then...

Either way, the manual said 8 ohm to 16 ohm impedance only... I was
thinking of using the 4-ohm subwoofer speakers I got (great deal on
car audio) that I currently use on my Onkyo.

Oh well..

"Nobody in their right mind..." ha ha ha.

Thanks guys

M
 
BobG wrote:
On Apr 9, 12:55�am, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@earthlink.net
wrote:
� �I have seen 2% THD described as sounding like a barrel of nails in a
cement mixer.
=============================
But in court, this would be objected to as hearsay. We have all heard
horrible distorted clipped hash coming from and amp, but was that .5%,
5%, or 50% THD we were hearing at the time? Anyone can hear a diff in
an AB comparison with a graphic EQ in and out, but few can characteris
it quantatatively and within about an octave. Unless they have a
couple decades experience in live sound reinforcement like me and a
couple of buddies. They could win a bet in a bar if you took in a
signal generator and a spectrum analyzer. Perfect pitch.

Right. Where are you going to find a judge, lawyers and a jury who
know ANYTHING about electronics, let alone how to do the proper tests,
or even know what test equipment was needed?

If you ever heard 2% THD you wouldn't argue. 2% at full rated power
was the standard spec for school intercom systems and background music
systems in stores. They would buy the smallest amp they could squeeze by
with, which sounded like crap. They were always amazed when I put in an
amp with a lower distortion rating. They could understand the messages,
and the background music didn't make your skin crawl, like it was trying
to get away from the noise.

WTH does perfect pitch have to do with recognizing distortion? I was
in the commercial sound business for over 20 years.


--
aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists

Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file
* drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic.

http://improve-usenet.org/index.html


Use any search engine other than Google till they stop polluting USENET
with porn and junk commercial SPAM
 
On Apr 9, 12:58�am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
BobG wrote:
�But 'visible clipping' is
about 10%, and is surprisingly inaudible.

Absolute nonsense. You can easily see clipping on a sinewave on a scope at
less than 1% and it's CLEARLY audible due to the high harmonic content.

Graham
===========================================================Lets generate a test waveform with 1khz fundamental and 3% of 3khz...
formula is something like wave[n]=350.0*sin(twopi*n/1024.0) + (350.0
* 0.03)*sin(twopi*3.0*n/1024.0); I'm using ampl of 350 because I'm
plotting 1024*768. You agree this amplitude of 3rd harmonic will give
3% THD?
 
On Apr 9, 8:49�pm, "Phil Allison" <philalli...@tpg.com.au> wrote:
** Hey Bob,

take a breath - �you are not talking about the same topic as others here !!
=============================================I claimed that one cannot see 3% distortion in a sine wave on a scope.
I got a response that this is utter nonsense, and its easy to see 1%
THD on a scope. So I want to synthesize a waveform with fundamental of
amplitude X and 3rd harmonic down at 0.03X. Then I will plot it and
see for myself if in fact 3% is easily visible and my claim was utter
nonsense. Of course, I'll be using a computer monitor with about 3
times the vertical resolution of most scopes, but that should just
make the distorion easier to see.... I'm making the test harder for
myself. I wouldnt want anyone to say my experiment was biased in favor
of my claim. Just trying to defend myself against the assertion that I
have spoken utter nonsense.
 
On Apr 8, 10:16 pm, mrdarr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 8, 9:58 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:

BobG wrote:
But 'visible clipping' is
about 10%, and is surprisingly inaudible.

Absolute nonsense. You can easily see clipping on a sinewave on a scope at
less than 1% and it's CLEARLY audible due to the high harmonic content.

Graham

Perhaps you have better ears than the rest of us. ;-)

There's a cellphone ringtone that supposedly only teenagers can hear,
no one over thirty - so if they get a call, their parents/teachers are
none the wiser.

Michael


How would that be possible?



Adam
Do something good today. Fight cancer with just a click! - Global
Cancer Research Institute
http://gcri.blogspot.com/
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top