B
Bret Cahill
Guest
A 100 microwatt PV panel shouldn't cost too much on a production
basis.
Bret Cahill
basis.
Bret Cahill
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Solar calculators are cheap, as are those LED garden lights. A smallA 100 microwatt PV panel shouldn't cost too much on a production
basis.
Bret Cahill
What's really surprising -- no one has even commented on this eitherA 100 microwatt PV panel shouldn't cost too much on a production
basis.
Bret Cahill
Solar calculators are cheap, as are those LED garden lights. A small
polysilicon PV probably costs pennies in production.
Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings.A 100 microwatt PV panel shouldn't cost too much on a production
basis.
Bret Cahill
Solar calculators are cheap, as are those LED garden lights. A small
polysilicon PV probably costs pennies in production.
What's really surprising -- no one has even commented on this either
-- is the size of the smallest micro electronic item is still as large
or larger than DARPA's insect drones.
It's as though everything sold to consumers _must_ have a key pad,
buttons or switches that require cm^2 of surface area.
How this mentality got grandfathered in is a mystery. Garden lights
have no buttons or size requirements so there is no reason not to
miniturize garden lights for Dollar Store "Glowing Sand" or confetti.
In that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
There's already glow-in-the-dark-paint.In that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings.
Bret Cahill
It won't glow all night w/o UV or other illumination.In that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings.
Bret Cahill
There's already glow-in-the-dark-paint.
When I type "glow" into Google's search field, the first suggestion to
pop up is "glow in the dark paint".
Well, it looks like you have a business plan then. Time to stop postingA 100 microwatt PV panel shouldn't cost too much on a production
basis.
Bret Cahill
Solar calculators are cheap, as are those LED garden lights. A small
polysilicon PV probably costs pennies in production.
What's really surprising -- no one has even commented on this either --
is the size of the smallest micro electronic item is still as large or
larger than DARPA's insect drones.
It's as though everything sold to consumers _must_ have a key pad,
buttons or switches that require cm^2 of surface area.
How this mentality got grandfathered in is a mystery. Garden lights
have no buttons or size requirements so there is no reason not to
miniturize garden lights for Dollar Store "Glowing Sand" or confetti.
In that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
This is nothing less than the next phase of the microelectronicsA 100 microwatt PV panel shouldn't cost too much on a production
basis.
Bret Cahill
Solar calculators are cheap, as are those LED garden lights. A small
polysilicon PV probably costs pennies in production.
What's really surprising -- no one has even commented on this either --
is the size of the smallest micro electronic item is still as large or
larger than DARPA's insect drones.
It's as though everything sold to consumers _must_ have a key pad,
buttons or switches that require cm^2 of surface area.
How this mentality got grandfathered in is a mystery. Garden lights
have no buttons or size requirements so there is no reason not to
miniturize garden lights for Dollar Store "Glowing Sand" or confetti.
In that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
Well, it looks like you have a business plan then.
The strontium aluminate stuff is impressive, 10:1 or so better than zincOn 06/17/2013 06:08 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
In that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings.
Bret Cahill
There's already glow-in-the-dark-paint.
When I type "glow" into Google's search field, the first suggestion to
pop up is "glow in the dark paint".
Just make it into an impedance matching exercise.I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably
physically impossible.
Scaling down garden lights might go as far as originally hoped for theIn that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings.
Bret Cahill
There's already glow-in-the-dark-paint.
When I type "glow" into Google's search field, the first suggestion to
pop up is "glow in the dark paint".
The strontium aluminate stuff is impressive, 10:1 or so better than zinc
sulfide.
People in remote villages could leave sheets of that outdoors and take them in
at night as usable illumination. No batteries to degrade.
I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably
physically impossible.
The car wasn't mine and it wasn't imaginary. It was silly.On 06/17/2013 03:58 PM, John Larkin wrote:
I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably
physically impossible.
Just make it into an impedance matching exercise.
Like your imaginary wind-powered car that tapped power off one wheel to
travel downwind faster than the wind that pushed it.
Fun in the father of invention.I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably
physically impossible.
Just make it into an impedance matching exercise.
Like your imaginary wind-powered car that tapped power off one wheel to
travel downwind faster than the wind that pushed it.
The car wasn't mine and it wasn't imaginary. It was silly.
I would ge even further and make it a quasi Law of ThermoIn that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings.
Bret Cahill
There's already glow-in-the-dark-paint.
When I type "glow" into Google's search field, the first suggestion to
pop up is "glow in the dark paint".
The strontium aluminate stuff is impressive, 10:1 or so better than zinc
sulfide.
People in remote villages could leave sheets of that outdoors and take them in
at night as usable illumination. No batteries to degrade.
I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably
physically impossible.
A single D-cell would get you through the night, powering enough LEDsIn that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and
cost almost nothing.
Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings.
Bret Cahill
There's already glow-in-the-dark-paint.
When I type "glow" into Google's search field, the first suggestion to
pop up is "glow in the dark paint".
The strontium aluminate stuff is impressive, 10:1 or so better than zinc
sulfide.
People in remote villages could leave sheets of that outdoors and take them in
at night as usable illumination. No batteries to degrade.
I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably
physically impossible.
I would ge even further and make it a quasi Law of Thermo
It's the same energy storage problem as micro garden lights. The only
material / battery / super cap that could store enough energy would be
a high explosive much higher than anything except nukes. Li-ion is
probably the limit and has been misleading as to future breakthroughs.
A book light maybe but cooking 200 gms of rice? No way.In that case the LED, PV and battery would be printed up on paper and >> >>> cost almost nothing. >> >> >> Different colors could be used to "paint" on the sides of buildings. >> >> >> Bret Cahill >> >> >There's already glow-in-the-dark-paint. >> >> >When I type "glow" into Google's search field, the first suggestion to >> >pop up is "glow in the dark paint". >> >> The strontium aluminate stuff is impressive, 10:1 or so better than zinc >> sulfide. >> >> People in remote villages could leave sheets of that outdoors and take them in >> at night as usable illumination. No batteries to degrade. >> >> I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably >> physically impossible. > >I would ge even further and make it a quasi Law of Thermo > >It's the same energy storage problem as micro garden lights. The only >material / battery / super cap that could store enough energy would be >a high explosive much higher than anything except nukes. Li-ion is >probably the limit and has been misleading as to future breakthroughs.
A single D-cell would get you through the night, powering enough LEDs to read a book or study for school or cook your dinner. And a D cell isn't explosive.
Now I am puzzled. Is the laughing gem a really good glower, or is itJohn Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> writes:
I wish there was a really good glow-in-the-dark stuff, but it's probably
physically impossible.
I'm being really goofy 2nite.
Clitocybe illudens, Omphalotus illudens, Omphalotus olearius [the names
are according to the google. I lost my field manual on macro/microscopic
identification of fungi].
They were previously know by their common name "laughing gem" - the
cultivars I am familiar with do not contain psilocybe - but then again I
said the same thing about Panaeolus subbalteatus ``belted cap''.
Apparently the google says that the Panaeolus subbalteatus is the most
common mushroom ingested for recreational purposes. I would have thought
the Stropharia family to be more popular - but you know how those goofy
mushroom people are.
Anycase, the laugyhing gem has been reported to "glow in the dark"
according the Mycological Association I was foolish enough to join.
There was one case where the mushroom was consumed and it was reported
that the person did not suffer from any toxic effects.